The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 94 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 Slope 用户则强调 user-friendly interface, 通知和数据集成, 客房管理和客房清洁。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
+
通知和数据集成
▾
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
+
客房管理和客房清洁
▾
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
+
在线预订集成
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
−
图形改进
▾
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
−
估算计算器模块
▾
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | #35 14 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #46 4 条评价 | #30 15 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | #33 2 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | #41 10 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | #48 3 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #43 4 条评价 | #35 5 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | #46 1 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | #59 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | #15 34 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) for your hotel involves balancing ease of use, features, support, and cost. Counter by Counter and Slope by Slope are two prominent options that promise to streamline your operations, but they serve different hotel segments and come with distinct strengths. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and regional presence.
Counter offers a free, user-friendly system designed mainly for hostels and small properties, while Slope provides a comprehensive, paid solution suitable for a range of hotel types, including larger independent hotels and hotel groups. Are you ready to evaluate which platform aligns with your current needs and future plans?
Counter by Counter is tailored for hostels and small properties, emphasizing simplicity, mobile management, and essential features. Its free model and straightforward interface make it attractive for hostel owners and boutique operators who prioritize ease over extensive functionality.
Slope by Slope caters to hotels of all sizes, from boutique properties to large chains, offering a broad feature set within a single cloud platform. It integrates everything from PMS to marketing tools, targeting hotels seeking automation, real-time analytics, and extensive operational control.
While Counter is praised for its ease of use and responsiveness, Slope’s comprehensive suite aims to replace multiple systems, reducing the need for integrations. Both platforms aim to improve operational efficiency but are designed for different hotel profiles. Do you need a simple, cost-effective system or a full-featured management platform?
If your hotel primarily operates as a hostel or small inn with limited staff and straightforward needs, Counter is likely the better fit. Its free model, high ease-of-use ratings, and targeted features like POS integration make it ideal for properties focused on quick onboarding and minimal complexity.
For larger independent hotels or hotel groups with multiple departments, Slope’s extensive features—such as real-time analytics, integrated booking engine, and guest CRM—are essential. Its ability to manage complex operations and support multiple revenue streams makes it suitable for properties looking to scale operations efficiently.
In summary, choose Counter if your priority is simplicity, affordability, and quick setup. Opt for Slope if you require a robust, all-in-one platform that handles complex management tasks with automation and depth.
Counter has an average ease-of-use rating of 4.6/5, with many users praising its intuitive interface, especially suited for hostel staff and small property teams. Its mobile-friendly design allows staff to manage check-ins, check-outs, and reservations from anywhere with minimal training.
Slope outperforms in usability with a 4.94/5 rating. Its modern, streamlined UI simplifies operations across departments, and users report quick onboarding and straightforward navigation that reduces staff learning curves, even for complex functions like revenue management.
Both platforms receive high marks for onboarding and support, but Slope’s slightly higher rating reflects its focus on usability for larger teams managing multiple functions. Edge: Slope.
Counter excels with its dedicated ancillary revenue tracking feature, allowing hostels to monitor additional income streams effortlessly. It also offers core PMS functionalities such as reservations, POS integration, and basic reporting, totaling 18 shared features.
Slope provides a broader array of features—31 unique ones—including transactional emails, native email marketing, gift vouchers, task management, automated reminders, integrated ID & passport scanners, digital registration, guest app, online check-in, and real-time reporting. It also includes modules for revenue management, spa & wellness, and employee messaging, making it a more comprehensive solution.
While Counter’s specialized features are valuable for small-scale operators, Slope’s extensive suite supports more complex, multi-department management. Edge: Slope.
Counter’s support and onboarding ratings sit at 4.96/5, with users highlighting fast responses and helpful staff like Evelyn and Max. Reviewers appreciate the quick resolution of issues, although some mention slower support in certain time zones.
Slope’s support is similarly rated high at 4.97/5, with users describing the team as friendly, quick to respond, and proactive in implementing updates. Both platforms have received praise for their support quality, but the slightly higher rating and the platform's larger user base suggest more consistent service.
Edge: Slope.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including popular platforms like SiteMinder, Stripe, and Goki, with integrations mainly focused on channel management and payment processing. It offers core integrations suitable for small properties but has fewer options for expanding connectivity.
Slope boasts 11 verified integrations, including shared partners like SiteMinder and additional unique ones like Lybra Tech, Guestnet, and Ai Kosmo. Its broader integration ecosystem supports larger hotel operations, property groups, and hospitality-specific modules like electronic invoicing and payment solutions.
For properties with existing tech stacks or plans to expand their online reach, Slope offers more flexible connectivity. Edge: Slope.
Counter holds a high overall rating of 4.73/5 based on 54 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use and support quality. Its primary users are hostels and small properties, who appreciate its straightforward management tools.
Slope’s rating, however, is 0/5 with only 35 reviews, and the platform’s recent reviews are limited. The low rating suggests that it is less favored by users, likely due to its complexity or niche focus. Given the volume and recency of Counter reviews, it boasts stronger user satisfaction.
Edge: Counter.
Counter is a free, software-as-a-service platform with no mention of charges, trial periods, or implementation fees. Its open-access model makes it highly attractive for small properties and startups.
Slope’s pricing starts at $600/month, with a 30-day trial available. As a paid product, it targets hotels willing to invest in a comprehensive management solution, with additional costs possibly for modules or integrations.
If budget is a concern, Counter’s free model offers significant value; if your property requires advanced features and automation, Slope’s investment might be justified.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Counter by Counter provides a straightforward, free PMS tailored for hostels and small properties, excelling in ease of use and support, with high satisfaction ratings. It’s best suited if you want a simple, quick-to-deploy system that handles basic operations efficiently.
Slope by Slope offers a broad, integrated platform capable of managing complex hotel operations, including revenue management, marketing, and multi-department workflows. It’s the right choice if your hotel requires automation, extensive features, and scalability.
Choose Counter if your focus is on simplicity, affordability, and quick setup. Opt for Slope if your hotel needs a comprehensive, all-in-one solution that grows with your business.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Users praise the intuitive and modern interface that facilitates quick learning and reduces training efforts, as reflected in reviews 76199 and 76154.... Users praise the intuitive and modern interface that facilitates quick learning and reduces training efforts, as reflected in reviews 76199 and 76154. This eases operations and reduces stress during peak periods.
正如评论 76207 中指出的,通过 SDI 通知导入客人登记数据和拒绝发票等自动化功能可提高运营效率。
模块有助于房间和任务的安排、简化客房服务任务和房间清洁组织,详见评论 76189。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
建议的改进包括升级预订引擎图形(在评论 76199 中提到),以提升用户体验。
一些用户(例如评论 76189 中的用户)提到需要更新估算计算器模块,表明它与其他软件元素相比落后。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Slope 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Slope 提供 11 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Slope 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Slope:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Slope 的为 78。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问