The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Counter 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Zimmersoftware 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 On premise and Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc).
基于 HTR 上 57 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $200/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 57 | 0 |
在分析了 57 条经验证的评价后,Counter 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 客户支持, 自动化功能,而 Zimmersoftware 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
自动化功能
▾
|
|
|
+
平台集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
错误问题
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
|
−
价格
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #26 28 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | #46 4 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #32 2 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #31 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #31 16 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 | #44 4 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #43 4 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #32 5 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #25 8 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #20 25 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #16 4 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Counter by Counter and Zimmersoftware by Zimmersoftware hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational priorities. Both aim to streamline property management, but Counter’s focus on hostels and its extensive review-backed features set it apart. Zimmersoftware, being a newer and less-reviewed platform, offers a simpler, all-in-one solution but lacks the depth of community feedback. Does your team need a proven, feature-rich PMS for hostel management or a straightforward system for broader hospitality use?
Counter’s 54 recent reviews and high ratings—4.73/5 overall, 4.6/5 ease of use, and 4.96/5 customer support—make it the stronger choice for most hoteliers. Zimmersoftware’s absence of reviews and lack of recent data make it difficult to evaluate its reliability or suitability. Are you comfortable adopting a newer platform with untested support and limited feedback?
Counter emerges as the clear leader in this comparison, thanks to its robust review count, recent user feedback, and high scores. Its extensive feature set, including payment processing, a housekeeping module, and group functionalities, has been well received by hostels and similar properties. Zimmersoftware’s limited reviews and no recent user feedback make it a risky choice, especially when proven solutions are available. If you’re seeking a trusted, well-rated PMS, Counter is the obvious pick.
Counter is designed specifically for hostels and small properties, with a focus on ease of use, automation, and integrations—features that are highly praised in its reviews. Zimmersoftware positions itself as an all-in-one solution suitable for hotels, guesthouses, and vacation rentals, emphasizing simplicity and mobile accessibility. While Counter’s user reviews highlight its reliability and continuous improvements, Zimmersoftware’s lack of recent feedback makes it hard to gauge its current effectiveness.
Counter’s recent reviews underscore its strengths in automation, channel management, and responsive support, making it ideal for properties that value operational efficiency. Conversely, Zimmersoftware’s broad appeal and cloud-based design might attract properties seeking a straightforward, less feature-heavy platform, but without user feedback, its actual performance remains unverified. Are you prioritizing proven features and community validation or exploring a less-tested, all-in-one approach?
If your hotel operates primarily as a hostel or similar property, and you need a PMS with proven reliability, automation, and extensive integrations, go with Counter. Its review count and recent feedback demonstrate its capacity to handle complex operations, including automated night audits, POS integration, and group bookings. For hotels or guesthouses needing a simple, mobile-friendly system without a large feature set, Zimmersoftware’s approach might appeal—though its unreviewed status raises questions.
Counter is better suited for properties that require detailed revenue management, flexible rates, and comprehensive support. Zimmersoftware could fit smaller, less complex operations looking for a straightforward reservation and billing system but carries the risk of limited community validation. Do your operational needs align with Counter’s proven robustness or Zimmersoftware’s simplicity?
Counter boasts a high ease-of-use rating of 4.6/5 and an onboarding score of 4.7/5, reflecting its intuitive interface and positive user experiences. Users praise its clean, simple layout, with quick staff training and a mobile aspect that allows remote management. Zimmersoftware, lacking recent reviews and detailed feedback, does not have measurable ratings but claims to be intuitive and mobile-friendly. Without recent user testimonials, it’s impossible to assess its usability confidently.
Counter’s support team is highly rated at 4.96/5, with specific praise for fast, helpful responses, although some users report slower response times in certain time zones. Zimmersoftware’s support and onboarding experiences are unverified due to the absence of recent reviews. Edge: Counter.
Counter offers 10 shared features and 9 exclusive ones, including payment processing, calendar view, custom rates, housekeeping, group functionality, automated night audits, a mobile app, and ancillary revenue tracking. Zimmersoftware provides only 3 unique features, such as on-premise operation, transactional emails, and gift vouchers, and shares 10 features with Counter.
Counter’s rich feature set supports complex operations like automated night audits and detailed revenue tracking—features that can significantly streamline your daily tasks. Zimmersoftware’s limited features may appeal for straightforward reservation and billing needs but lack depth. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s customer support is rated near perfect at 4.96/5, with reviews praising quick and professional responses. Support staff like Evelyn and Max are frequently mentioned for their helpfulness. Zimmersoftware has no recent reviews, making it impossible to evaluate support quality or responsiveness.
Counter’s support team has proven to be a major asset for hoteliers, particularly when resolving bugs, system issues, or onboarding challenges. Zimmersoftware’s support experience is unverified, which poses a risk for properties relying heavily on responsive assistance. Edge: Counter.
Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including major channel managers and payment processors like Stripe, and has integrations with WuBook, FLYR Hospitality, SiteMinder, and others. Zimmersoftware connects with 4 verified partners, such as RoomPriceGenie and happyhotel, but lacks the breadth of Counter.
Counter’s extensive integrations facilitate multi-channel distribution, online payments, and access control, supporting smooth operations across platforms. Zimmersoftware’s fewer integrations limit connectivity options, which may restrict growth or operational flexibility. Edge: Counter.
Counter’s recent reviews reflect a strong user base, especially among hostels, with a 4.75/5 average rating from 52 reviews. Its overall rating of 4.73/5 and a likelihood to recommend of 91% underscore satisfaction in recent feedback. Zimmersoftware has no reviews or recent feedback, preventing a meaningful comparison.
The high and recent ratings for Counter demonstrate consistent positive user experiences. Without data, Zimmersoftware’s reputation remains uncertain, making Counter the safe, trusted choice. Edge: Counter.
Counter does not disclose specific pricing, but it is free to use, making it highly attractive for small properties or startups. Zimmersoftware charges a $200 monthly fee with a 30-day trial, positioning itself as a paid, subscription-based platform.
Counter’s free model eliminates financial barriers and allows your team to evaluate the system risk-free. Zimmersoftware’s clear pricing may appeal if you seek a straightforward, predictable fee but could be a deterrent for smaller properties or those uncertain about long-term value. Is a free solution more aligned with your budget constraints?
Counter’s focus on hostels and budget accommodations, combined with its automation and integrations, makes it ideal for properties aiming to streamline operations without heavy overhead. Larger hotels with complex revenue needs might find it limited.
Zimmersoftware’s lightweight design suits small, independent properties focused on core reservation and billing tasks. Larger or multi-region hotels might find it lacks the depth they need.
Counter is a proven, feature-rich PMS with a strong recent review base, making it the safer, more reliable choice for most properties, especially hostels. Its broad set of integrations, automation, and support infrastructure make daily management more straightforward and efficient.
Choose Counter if your hotel values proven reliability, extensive features, and community validation. Its high user ratings and recent reviews confirm its capacity to meet demanding operational needs.
Zimmersoftware appears to target smaller, less complex properties with its simplified, all-in-one approach. However, the lack of recent reviews and community feedback makes it a risky investment if you require a dependable, well-supported system.
Opt for Zimmersoftware only if you prioritize a straightforward, budget-friendly solution and are willing to accept the uncertainty of unverified support and performance. For most hoteliers seeking peace of mind, Counter remains the preferred choice.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $200/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Counter 和 Zimmersoftware 共享 10 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 交付过程 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 管家模块 | ||
| 组功能 | ||
| 自定义费率 |
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单... 酒店经营者认为 Counter 的界面简洁、直观且用户友好,便于快速培训新员工。移动和桌面界面运行良好,允许管理人员远程处理任务。它尤其以日历和日历管理的简单性而著称。
Counter 的支持团队因其响应迅速和乐于助人而经常受到称赞。Evelyn 和 Max 等员工因其专业精神而受到特别表扬。然而,有人担心某些时区的支持速度较慢。
用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率... 用户对 Counter 的自动化功能非常满意,其中包括非接触式登记入住、自动信用卡收费以及跨平台管理预订等任务。这种自动化功能减少了员工工作量并提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
几位酒店老板提到系统中存在持续存在的错误,尤其是超额预订、床位显示和取消预订时的系统错误等问题。这些错误对日常运营和客人体验产生了负面影响。
酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企... 酒店经营者对 Counter 的报告功能表示赞赏,但指出报告可以改进,以便提供更好的见解。收入管理功能被认为不足,特别是对于采用多种房价计划或使用动态定价的企业而言。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Counter 和 Zimmersoftware 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Counter 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Zimmersoftware 提供 4 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Counter 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Counter:否。Zimmersoftware:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Counter 的 HT Score 为 17,Zimmersoftware 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问