The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 78 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Crave Interactive 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Credit Card Payments and Payments Integrations.
Gastfreund | Hotelcore 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile Checkin.
基于 HTR 上 78 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $400/mo | From $400/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 67 | 11 |
在分析了 78 条经验证的评价后,Crave Interactive 用户最看重其 客户服务, 用户界面, 定制,而 Gastfreund | Hotelcore 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
用户界面
▾
|
|
|
+
定制
▾
|
|
|
+
宾客沟通
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
硬件问题
▾
|
|
|
−
无缝系统集成
▾
|
|
|
−
后端系统
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #6 13 条评价 | #25 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #9 26 条评价 | #20 5 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 14 条评价 | #24 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 7 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #6 26 条评价 | #23 3 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 31 条评价 | #30 1 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 27 条评价 | #18 3 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #10 2 条评价 | #15 1 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #4 26 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #8 31 条评价 | #14 9 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #8 2 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #8 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right guest app platform can significantly impact your hotel's operations, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Crave Mobile Platform by Crave Interactive and Gastfreund | Hotelcore are two prominent options, each designed to enhance guest engagement but with different strengths. Crave's platform is more mature, with a broader feature set and a stronger global presence, while Gastfreund focuses on modular solutions that streamline guest communication and information. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
Both platforms aim to improve guest experience through digital engagement, but they approach this goal differently. Crave offers a comprehensive, app-less mobile platform with extensive features for food ordering, contactless payments, and in-venue services, making it suitable for hotels seeking robust service automation. Gastfreund emphasizes delivering tailored digital guest directories, info channels, and communication tools to create personalized guest journeys, primarily focusing on information delivery and operational efficiency.
Crave's platform boasts a higher overall rating (4.75/5) backed by more recent and numerous reviews (48 reviews in the last six months), indicating stronger current user satisfaction. Gastfreund’s score is lower at 0/5, with only 11 reviews, though it benefits from more recent feedback (2 reviews in the last six months). Given this, Crave's platform demonstrates a more established presence and proven performance, making it a more reliable choice for many hotels.
Are you looking for a feature-rich, integrated guest engagement system or a flexible information delivery platform? The decision hinges on your hotel's specific operational priorities.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, scalable mobile guest engagement platform with capabilities like contactless ordering, payments, and in-venue services, Crave is the clear choice. Its extensive feature set (16 exclusive features including QR codes, Apple Pay, NFC, and POS integration) suits properties aiming for a high level of automation and guest interaction.
Conversely, if your focus is on providing a tailored digital guest directory, easy-to-use communication tools, and reducing front desk inquiries—especially in vacation rentals, resorts, or boutique properties—Gastfreund's modular solutions (including a digital guest app and info channels) might be more appropriate. However, its lower review count and overall ratings should be considered.
If seamless, broad-feature coverage is your priority, choose Crave. For targeted, guest-centric information delivery, Gastfreund is a decent alternative.
Crave’s platform scores higher for ease of use, with a 4.61/5 rating, and its onboarding process receives positive feedback for being efficient and well-structured. Reviewers highlight that the user interface is intuitive for both staff and guests, with many praising the proactive customer service team.
Gastfreund’s platform scores 4.27/5 for usability, with users appreciating its modern interface and straightforward operation, though some note it requires more familiarization. Support and onboarding are rated slightly lower but remain competent.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave offers a broader array of exclusive features—16 in total—including web-based access, QR codes, Apple Pay, digital menus, in-venue ordering, contactless payments, NFC, and POS integration—making it highly versatile. Gastfreund’s platform provides core features like digital guest directories and info channels, with only 2 unique features (app download and mobile check-in).
Crave's extensive feature set supports diverse automation needs and revenue opportunities, while Gastfreund excels at delivering essential guest information and communication. For a hotel seeking a feature-rich, all-encompassing system, Crave is the clear winner.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave’s customer support is highly rated at 4.79/5, with reviewers emphasizing quick response times and proactive help, often citing responses within minutes during urgent issues. Guests praise Crave’s support team for being professional, helpful, and accessible 24/7.
Gastfreund’s support scores 4.27/5, with users describing the team as friendly and efficient, but some reviews mention room for quicker responses during peak times. While support is solid, Crave’s ratings suggest a slight edge in responsiveness and reliability.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave’s overall rating of 4.75/5 is reinforced by 48 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing ease of use, support, and feature richness. Hoteliers across various segments—especially branded and city center hotels—appreciate its reliability and extensive capabilities.
Gastfreund’s lower ratings (0/5 from 11 reviews) limit its comparative value, with some users noting that the platform's performance and features don’t meet expectations. Due to the volume and recency of reviews, Crave’s rating is a more trustworthy indicator of current hotel satisfaction.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Both platforms are priced at a base fee of $400, with no mention of additional implementation fees, monthly per-room charges, or freemium options. Pricing appears straightforward, but additional costs—such as hardware or custom integrations—may vary based on your hotel’s specific setup.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a simple digital directory without extensive automation or if you operate primarily in niche segments with minimal tech integration needs.
Not ideal if you require advanced automation features like contactless ordering, in-venue payment systems, or extensive integrations beyond basic guest communication.
Crave’s platform delivers a broad suite of features with proven, high-quality support, making it suitable for hotels that want a comprehensive, automated guest engagement solution. Its extensive integrations and feature set support larger properties and brands aiming for maximum automation and revenue growth.
Gastfreund’s focus on digital guest directories and communication tools benefits smaller, boutique, or resort hotels that prioritize personalized guest experiences and operational efficiency. However, its lower ratings and limited features suggest it may not scale well for larger, tech-forward properties.
In summary, choose Crave if your goal is a feature-rich, globally proven guest app platform with extensive automation. Opt for Gastfreund if you need a simple, effective solution for delivering information and communicating with guests, especially in boutique or leisure-oriented properties.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | From $400/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Crave Mobile Platform 和 Gastfreund | Hotelcore 共享 9 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 二维码 | ||
| 信用卡付款 | ||
| 基于网络(无应用程序) | ||
| 应用下载 | ||
| 手机值机 | ||
| 数字菜单 | ||
| 现场订购 | ||
| 苹果支付 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 6 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Crave Interactive 提供卓越的客户服务,响应时间快,支持人员乐于助人。酒店经营者欣赏高效、主动的支持,这有助于迅速解决问题。
虽然用户界面因其对客人友好和直观而受到赞赏,但一些反馈表明它可以更加现代化和可定制,以更好地满足个别酒店的需求。
自定义选项(尤其是菜单更新和访客界面)有限,而且通常需要 Crave Interactive 团队的支持。用户表示希望对自定义有更多控制权。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论提到了对硬件的担忧,特别是平板电脑的耐用性和充电困难。这些问题会影响使用系统时的整体效率和客户满意度。
该系统与其他酒店管理系统(如 Simphony 和 PMS)的集成,使操作更加顺畅,减少了手动输入。这在大型活动期间以及高效管理客房服务时尤其有用。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Crave Mobile Platform 和 Gastfreund | Hotelcore 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Crave Mobile Platform 提供 17 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Gastfreund | Hotelcore 提供 13 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Crave Mobile Platform 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Crave Mobile Platform:否。Gastfreund | Hotelcore:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Crave Interactive 的 HT Score 为 75,Gastfreund | Hotelcore 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问