The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 282 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Crave Interactive 表现出色 在 客户服务 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Payments and Credit Card Payments.
STAY 表现出色 在 客户体验优化 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App and Guest Profiles.
基于 HTR 上 282 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $400/mo | From $300/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 67 | 215 |
在分析了 282 条经验证的评价后,Crave Interactive 用户最看重其 客户服务, 用户界面, 定制,而 STAY 用户则强调 客户体验优化, 移动和用户体验, 运营效率。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
+
客户体验优化
▾
|
|
+
用户界面
▾
|
+
移动和用户体验
▾
|
|
+
定制
▾
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
|
+
宾客沟通
▾
|
+
支持和服务
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
硬件问题
▾
|
−
CMS 和定制
▾
|
|
−
无缝系统集成
▾
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
|
−
后端系统
▾
|
−
分析和报告
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #6 13 条评价 | #9 10 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #9 26 条评价 | #4 83 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 14 条评价 | #2 89 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 7 条评价 | #2 24 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #6 26 条评价 | #2 77 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 31 条评价 | #2 88 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 27 条评价 | #3 91 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #10 2 条评价 | #6 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #4 26 条评价 | #5 27 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #8 31 条评价 | #3 112 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #8 2 条评价 | #6 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | #8 1 条评价 | #7 2 条评价 |
Choosing the right hotel guest app can significantly impact your guest experience, operational efficiency, and revenue. Both Crave Mobile Platform and STAY Guest App aim to improve how your guests access services, but they serve slightly different needs. Crave focuses heavily on guest engagement and service automation, while STAY emphasizes operational streamlining and real-time updates. Knowing their strengths and limitations will help you decide which aligns better with your hotel's goals.
Are you prioritizing a more established platform with extensive features and a larger global presence, or do you want a solution that simplifies operations and reduces wait times? Let's compare both in detail.
Crave Interactive offers a comprehensive, feature-rich mobile platform designed to elevate guest engagement through digital menus, in-venue ordering, contactless payments, and extensive integrations. It has a significant review count—48 reviews—and recent feedback remains absent, making its data slightly outdated but still valuable. STAY, on the other hand, boasts over 200 reviews with recent feedback, indicating stronger current user satisfaction.
Crave’s strength lies in its extensive feature set, including QR codes, Apple Pay, Google Pay, and POS integrations, making it suitable for hotels seeking a robust, customizable digital guest solution. STAY excels in operational efficiency, providing real-time updates, appointment bookings, and a straightforward CMS, making it ideal for hotels focused on reducing queues and streamlining staff workflows. Which of these priorities aligns with your hotel’s immediate needs?
If your hotel needs a guest app that offers in-depth engagement tools and diverse features—like multi-menu ordering, contactless payments, and integrations with POS or NFC—Crave is your best option. Its high rating of 4.75/5 from 48 reviews underscores its reliability and breadth of capabilities.
However, if your primary goal is operational efficiency—reducing front desk queues, improving internal communication, and providing real-time service updates—STAY’s simpler, more streamlined platform is preferable. It’s trusted by over 1,000 hotels in 67 countries, indicating a proven track record in delivering efficiency improvements and guest satisfaction. For hotels aiming to digitize operational workflows over guest engagement, STAY is the clear choice.
Crave's user interface receives a 4.61/5 rating, praised for its customizability and ease of use for staff and guests. However, some users note that menu creation could be simpler, and the back-end system might benefit from modernization. Customer support is highly rated at 4.79/5, with reviews highlighting quick and helpful responses.
STAY scores slightly higher in ease of use, with a 4.78/5 rating and reviews emphasizing its straightforward CMS and intuitive mobile experience. Its simplified design minimizes staff training time, and its user interface is praised for clarity. Edge: STAY.
Crave offers 17 unique features, including web-based (appless) operation, digital menus, in-venue ordering, contactless payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay, POS integration, and NFC. These features support a highly customizable and versatile guest experience, especially suited for hotels with varied service needs.
STAY provides 6 exclusive features, such as a dedicated mobile app, chatbot functionality, automated replies, message routing, and guest profiles. While less feature-dense, these tools excel at streamlining operations and delivering quick, automated communication.
Crave’s extensive feature set makes it the more comprehensive platform, but STAY’s targeted features focus on simplifying staff workflows. Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave’s customer support is highly rated at 4.79/5, with reviews praising its quick, polite, and effective responses. Hoteliers appreciate its proactive support, especially during menu updates and technical issues, although some mention that hardware durability could improve.
STAY’s support is similarly rated at 4.83/5, with reviews emphasizing helpful, prompt assistance. Some users note that STAY’s support lacks phone options, which can slow issue resolution for certain regions.
While both are excellent, Crave’s support has a slight edge due to more positive recent reviews. Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave integrates with 17 verified partners, including systems like Oracle Hospitality, Amadeus, Infor, and Kipsu, providing extensive compatibility with hotel management systems. STAY, with 20 verified partners, also supports seamless integrations with PMS, CRM, and other internal applications, including Hotelkit, Mews, and SiteMinder.
Both platforms boast strong integration portfolios, but STAY’s broader partner list and widespread adoption in large chains like NH Hotels and Riu suggest a slight advantage for hotels seeking extensive system connectivity. Edge: STAY.
Crave’s overall rating is 4.75/5 based on 48 reviews, with recent feedback indicating high satisfaction. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, integration, and customer service, especially in large or luxury hotels.
STAY’s rating is 3/5 across 200 reviews, with recent feedback highlighting operational benefits but also noting issues like slow reporting and limited language options. Given the larger review base and recent positive comments, Crave’s rating is more indicative of current hotelier satisfaction. Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave’s pricing begins at a base of $400, with no mention of a trial or freemium model. STAY’s base price is $300, also without a trial or free tier, making them comparable in upfront costs.
Cost considerations should include features and support: Crave’s higher price may reflect its extensive features, while STAY’s lower entry point suits hotels prioritizing operational efficiency.
Not ideal if you prefer a simple, operational tool without many extra features or if your hotel has limited technical support.
Not ideal if you need extensive guest engagement features like digital menus or complex payment integrations.
Crave Interactive offers a comprehensive, feature-rich guest app with high satisfaction ratings and extensive integrations, making it suitable for hotels seeking engagement and marketing tools. Its strong support network and user-friendly interface make it a reliable choice, especially for larger or luxury properties.
STAY focuses on operational efficiency, with a simple, intuitive platform that reduces queues and enhances internal workflows. Its integration capabilities and real-time updates make it ideal for hotels looking to streamline staff operations and improve guest satisfaction through digital service delivery.
If your hotel values rich guest engagement and marketing, Crave is the stronger candidate. For a focus on efficiency and internal communication, STAY provides a more targeted, easy-to-implement solution.
In conclusion, choose Crave if you want a broad, feature-rich platform with high engagement capabilities. Opt for STAY if your primary goal is to improve operational flow, reduce wait times, and simplify management—especially if you prefer a straightforward, easy-to-use system with proven success in large chains.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | From $300/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Crave Mobile Platform 和 STAY Guest App 共享 8 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 二维码 | ||
| 付款 | ||
| 基于网络(无应用程序) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 应用下载 | ||
| 数字菜单 | ||
| 消息路由 | ||
| 现场订购 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 聊天机器人 | ||
| 自动回复 | ||
| 苹果支付 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 11 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Crave Interactive 提供卓越的客户服务,响应时间快,支持人员乐于助人。酒店经营者欣赏高效、主动的支持,这有助于迅速解决问题。
虽然用户界面因其对客人友好和直观而受到赞赏,但一些反馈表明它可以更加现代化和可定制,以更好地满足个别酒店的需求。
自定义选项(尤其是菜单更新和访客界面)有限,而且通常需要 Crave Interactive 团队的支持。用户表示希望对自定义有更多控制权。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论提到了对硬件的担忧,特别是平板电脑的耐用性和充电困难。这些问题会影响使用系统时的整体效率和客户满意度。
该系统与其他酒店管理系统(如 Simphony 和 PMS)的集成,使操作更加顺畅,减少了手动输入。这在大型活动期间以及高效管理客房服务时尤其有用。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便... 多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便利。
该应用的用户界面和移动体验因其直观和易于操作而广受好评。无论是酒店员工还是客人,用户都发现更新信息和管理内容非常简单。
STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现... STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现可持续发展目标。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
CMS 的亮点在于它的易用性和定制功能,但用户也指出了一些需要改进的地方,特别是在设计和功能方面的灵活性。
用户对 STAY 与各种内部应用程序和系统(包括 PMS 和 CRM 系统)的强大集成功能表示赞赏。这些集成简化了数据管理,并有助于为员工和客人提供无缝体验。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Crave Mobile Platform 和 STAY Guest App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Crave Mobile Platform 提供 17 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 STAY Guest App 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。STAY Guest App 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Crave Mobile Platform:否。STAY Guest App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Crave Interactive 的 HT Score 为 75,STAY 的为 47。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问