The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 67 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Crave Interactive 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Payments and Credit Card Payments.
LasoExperience 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Profiles and Mobile Checkin.
基于 HTR 上 67 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $400/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 67 | 0 |
在分析了 67 条经验证的评价后,Crave Interactive 用户最看重其 客户服务, 用户界面, 定制,而 LasoExperience 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
用户界面
▾
|
|
|
+
定制
▾
|
|
|
+
宾客沟通
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
硬件问题
▾
|
|
|
−
无缝系统集成
▾
|
|
|
−
后端系统
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #6 13 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #9 26 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 14 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 7 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #6 26 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 31 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 27 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #10 2 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #4 26 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #8 31 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #8 2 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #8 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Crave Mobile Platform by Crave Interactive and Laso Experience depends on your hotel’s specific needs. Crave is a well-established guest app that excels in service automation and operational integration, while Laso emphasizes personalized guest engagement and revenue generation through AI-driven tools. Both aim to improve guest satisfaction, but their core functions diverge significantly. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s strategy and guest expectations?
Crave’s platform is best suited for hotels that want a robust, feature-rich, and widely integrated mobile service system. Laso, on the other hand, is geared toward properties prioritizing data-driven guest relationships and upselling opportunities. Are you more focused on operational efficiency or guest personalization?
Crave Mobile Platform and Laso Experience serve different hotel priorities. Crave offers a comprehensive, app-less solution with features like in-venue ordering, contactless payments, QR codes, and extensive integrations, making it ideal for hotels seeking operational automation. Laso provides a unified CRM and marketing automation platform that excels in personalized communication and revenue optimization, suitable for hotels emphasizing guest relationships.
Crave scores higher on recent reviews and total review count (48 reviews, zero in the last six months), reflecting stronger current user feedback. Laso, with no recent reviews and no review count, has less proven recent performance data. Would you prefer a proven, feature-rich platform or a newer, AI-driven guest engagement tool?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive mobile app experience with in-venue ordering, contactless payments, and multi-platform integrations, Crave is the clear pick. It’s designed for hotels aiming to streamline operations, reduce manual effort, and offer a modern guest interface, particularly in luxury and branded hotel segments.
If your focus is on personalized guest communication, targeted marketing, and increasing ancillary revenue through detailed guest profiles and automation, Laso is more suitable. It’s ideal for properties wanting to build long-term guest relationships and optimize revenue streams via AI-driven insights.
For hotels seeking operational efficiency, go with Crave. For those prioritizing guest intimacy and revenue growth, choose Laso.
Crave scores a 4.61/5 in ease of use, based on extensive reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and helpful support teams. Customers highlight the platform’s user-friendly design for both staff and guests, making implementation smoother and adoption faster.
Laso Experience has no available user ratings or reviews, making it impossible to assess its usability. Given Crave’s high user satisfaction ratings and recent review activity, it clearly demonstrates a more reliable and straightforward user experience.
Edge: Crave Mobile Platform.
Crave offers 17 unique features, including web-based access, in-venue ordering, contactless payments, QR codes, Apple Pay, Google Pay, POS integration, tipping, upselling, and NFC. These tools support a wide range of operational needs and enhance guest convenience.
Laso provides only 3 exclusive features: guest profiles, mobile check-in, and app download capability, focusing more on guest relationship management rather than operational automation.
Crave’s extensive feature set makes it the more versatile and capable platform for full-service hotel operations.
Edge: Crave Mobile Platform.
Crave scores a 4.79/5 in customer support, with reviews praising its quick response times, proactive service, and knowledgeable staff. Hoteliers note that Crave’s support staff resolve issues efficiently, significantly aiding in onboarding and troubleshooting.
Laso Experience has no recent reviews or support ratings, making it difficult to evaluate its customer service quality. Given Crave’s strong recent support ratings and positive feedback, it remains the more reliable choice here.
Edge: Crave Mobile Platform.
Crave has 17 verified integrations, including major partners like Book4Time, Oracle Hospitality, Infor, Amadeus, and POS systems, making it highly adaptable to existing hotel systems. Laso, with only 3 verified partners, offers limited connectivity, including common platforms like Book4Time and Oracle but fewer options overall.
If your hotel relies on complex or multiple integrations, Crave’s extensive partner network provides a significant advantage.
Edge: Crave Mobile Platform.
Crave’s overall rating is 4.75/5 based on 48 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, customer support, and feature set. Hotel segments like luxury and branded hotels particularly rate Crave highly, with some reviews mentioning how the platform has increased guest engagement and operational efficiency.
Laso Experience has no reviews, ratings, or recent feedback, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction. Given the clear, positive reviews for Crave, it’s the better-rated product in this comparison.
Edge: Crave Mobile Platform.
Crave’s pricing starts at a base fee of $400, with no free tier, freemium model, or monthly per-room charges. There are no implementation fees or hidden costs listed.
Laso Experience has no publicly available pricing details, which may indicate a custom quote process. Without transparent pricing, it’s difficult to compare value directly, but Crave’s clear pricing model offers more predictability.
Not ideal if your hotel is small or has limited budget, as Crave’s extensive features might be more than you need.
Not ideal if your hotel requires a full-service, operational app with extensive integrations.
Crave Mobile Platform is a comprehensive, feature-rich mobile engagement system designed for hotels seeking operational automation and seamless integrations. Its extensive feature set and proven support make it suitable for larger, full-service hotels that want to streamline service delivery and enhance guest experience.
Laso Experience centers on personalized guest engagement and revenue optimization using AI and automation tools. It’s better suited for hotels focusing on building guest relationships and increasing ancillary sales through targeted marketing.
If your hotel needs a proven, versatile platform with extensive operational features, go with Crave. For properties prioritizing guest intimacy, personalization, and incremental revenue, Laso might be the right choice, though it currently lacks recent reviews to validate its performance.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Crave Mobile Platform 和 Laso Experience 共享 8 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 二维码 | ||
| 付款 | ||
| 基于网络(无应用程序) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 应用下载 | ||
| 手机值机 | ||
| 数字菜单 | ||
| 现场订购 | ||
| 苹果支付 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 8 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Crave Interactive 提供卓越的客户服务,响应时间快,支持人员乐于助人。酒店经营者欣赏高效、主动的支持,这有助于迅速解决问题。
虽然用户界面因其对客人友好和直观而受到赞赏,但一些反馈表明它可以更加现代化和可定制,以更好地满足个别酒店的需求。
自定义选项(尤其是菜单更新和访客界面)有限,而且通常需要 Crave Interactive 团队的支持。用户表示希望对自定义有更多控制权。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论提到了对硬件的担忧,特别是平板电脑的耐用性和充电困难。这些问题会影响使用系统时的整体效率和客户满意度。
该系统与其他酒店管理系统(如 Simphony 和 PMS)的集成,使操作更加顺畅,减少了手动输入。这在大型活动期间以及高效管理客房服务时尤其有用。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Crave Mobile Platform 和 Laso Experience 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Crave Mobile Platform 提供 17 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Laso Experience 提供 3 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Crave Mobile Platform 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Crave Mobile Platform:否。Laso Experience:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Crave Interactive 的 HT Score 为 75,LasoExperience 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问