The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 67 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Crave Interactive 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Payments and Guest Messaging.
Staymyway 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 67 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $400/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 67 | 0 |
在分析了 67 条经验证的评价后,Crave Interactive 用户最看重其 客户服务, 用户界面, 定制,而 Staymyway 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
用户界面
▾
|
|
|
+
定制
▾
|
|
|
+
宾客沟通
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
硬件问题
▾
|
|
|
−
无缝系统集成
▾
|
|
|
−
后端系统
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #6 13 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #9 26 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 14 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 7 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #6 26 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 31 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 27 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #10 2 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #4 26 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #8 31 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #8 2 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #8 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Crave Mobile Platform by Crave Interactive and the STAYmyway mobile app hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Crave’s platform tackles guest engagement and service automation through a comprehensive, feature-rich mobile solution, whereas Staymyway focuses on digital key access and guest communication. Both aim to elevate the guest experience but do so with different tools and scopes. Which aligns better with your hotel's operational goals?
Crave Interactive’s platform, backed by more reviews and recent positive feedback, offers a more proven track record. Staymyway, with no recent reviews or high ratings, remains less validated for your hotel’s needs. Are you ready to invest in a solution with a solid review history?
Crave’s platform addresses multiple aspects of guest engagement, from service automation to multi-lingual support, with 25 unique features. Staymyway offers a streamlined, app-based experience centered around mobile key access and basic communication, with no additional features listed. Do you prioritize a broad, feature-rich system or a simple, core functionality app?
Crave boasts a high overall rating of 4.75/5 based on 48 reviews, with recent feedback confirming its effectiveness. Staymyway’s lack of recent reviews and zero ratings make it difficult to assess, but it appears to have limited market presence. Which solution’s proven track record best suits your property’s scale and complexity?
If your hotel needs a robust guest engagement platform with features like in-room ordering, multi-lingual support, payments, and detailed analytics, go with Crave. It’s ideal for hotels seeking to boost operational efficiency and revenue through automation and guest personalization.
If your primary goal is offering digital key access combined with basic guest communication, and your hotel can operate without extensive integrations or advanced features, Staymyway may suffice. It’s better suited for smaller properties or those testing the waters of mobile engagement.
For hotels aiming for a comprehensive guest experience, Crave’s extensive features and proven support make it the clear choice. Conversely, if your focus is simple digital key access, Staymyway’s streamlined approach could save you initial investment.
Crave scores a high 4.61/5 for ease of use, with positive reviews highlighting its user-friendly interface and simple onboarding process. Users appreciate how staff and guests find the platform intuitive, with quick setup and straightforward operation.
Staymyway’s usability data is unavailable, which raises questions about its ease of implementation and daily operation. Given the lack of recent reviews, it’s uncertain whether it offers a similarly smooth experience.
Edge: Crave.
Crave offers 25 unique features, including web-based access, hotel directory, multi-lingual translations, payments, room service ordering, guest messaging, mobile checkout, QR codes, contactless ordering, POS integration, and upselling tools. Staymyway provides only basic app features like mobile key access and guest notifications, with no additional capabilities listed.
Crave’s extensive feature set caters to hotels wanting to automate a wide range of guest services and operational functions. Staymyway’s limited offering leaves it less suitable for properties needing more than basic communication and access.
Edge: Crave.
Crave boasts a high support rating of 4.79/5, with reviews praising its quick response times and helpful staff. Hoteliers highlight issues like rapid issue resolution and proactive assistance, especially during implementation and troubleshooting.
Staymyway’s support ratings and reviews are unavailable, which makes it difficult to evaluate its customer service quality. Without recent feedback, it’s risky to assume comparable support levels.
Edge: Crave.
Crave integrates with 17 verified partners, including major systems like Oracle Hospitality, Infor, and POS providers, offering broad compatibility with existing hotel tech. Staymyway connects with 7 verified partners, including WebRezPro, Cloudbeds, and Vingcard, but has fewer integration options overall.
Crave’s extensive integration network supports larger, more complex hotel operations. Staymyway’s limited integration list suits smaller properties or those with specific, simple needs.
Edge: Crave.
Crave’s overall rating of 4.75/5 and NPS of 9.15/10 are based on 48 recent reviews, with hoteliers praising its feature set, reliability, and customer service. Hotels across segments, including luxury and branded properties, rate it highly.
Staymyway’s ratings are nonexistent, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. The lack of recent reviews indicates limited market validation or adoption.
Edge: Crave.
Crave’s pricing starts at $400 for the base platform, with no mention of recurring fees or implementation costs. Staymyway does not publicly disclose pricing, leaving potential buyers to inquire directly, which complicates comparison.
Crave’s transparent, upfront pricing provides clarity for budgeting, whereas Staymyway’s absence of cost details suggests it may be tailored or variable.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, with minimal service automation needs, or if you prefer a plug-and-play, low-cost solution.
Not ideal if you need a full-service guest engagement platform or advanced integrations.
Crave Mobile Platform stands out as the more established, feature-rich, and well-reviewed solution, with a proven track record and extensive integrations. Its comprehensive set of tools makes it suitable for larger, more complex hotels seeking to elevate guest experiences and operational efficiency.
Staymyway offers a minimal, streamlined app mainly focused on digital key access and basic communication, which suits smaller properties or those new to mobile guest services. Its limited features and lack of recent reviews make it less attractive for hotels aiming to grow or innovate.
If you want a reliable, full-featured guest platform, Crave is the clear choice. If your hotel’s needs are simple and you’re testing mobile access, Staymyway might be enough—but proceed cautiously given the limited validation.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Crave Mobile Platform 和 Mobile App (STAYmyway) 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 付款 | ||
| 基于网络(无应用程序) | ||
| 客房服务订购 | ||
| 自动翻译(多语言) | ||
| 请求管理 | ||
| 酒店目录 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 13 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Crave Interactive 提供卓越的客户服务,响应时间快,支持人员乐于助人。酒店经营者欣赏高效、主动的支持,这有助于迅速解决问题。
虽然用户界面因其对客人友好和直观而受到赞赏,但一些反馈表明它可以更加现代化和可定制,以更好地满足个别酒店的需求。
自定义选项(尤其是菜单更新和访客界面)有限,而且通常需要 Crave Interactive 团队的支持。用户表示希望对自定义有更多控制权。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论提到了对硬件的担忧,特别是平板电脑的耐用性和充电困难。这些问题会影响使用系统时的整体效率和客户满意度。
该系统与其他酒店管理系统(如 Simphony 和 PMS)的集成,使操作更加顺畅,减少了手动输入。这在大型活动期间以及高效管理客房服务时尤其有用。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Crave Mobile Platform 和 Mobile App (STAYmyway) 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Crave Mobile Platform 提供 17 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mobile App (STAYmyway) 提供 7 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Crave Mobile Platform 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Crave Mobile Platform:否。Mobile App (STAYmyway):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Crave Interactive 的 HT Score 为 75,Staymyway 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问