The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 69 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Crave Interactive 表现出色 在 ROI and onboarding 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Credit Card Payments and Payments Integrations.
roommaster 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile Checkin and Guest Profiles.
基于 HTR 上 69 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $400/mo | From $1,000/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 67 | 2 |
在分析了 69 条经验证的评价后,Crave Interactive 用户最看重其 客户服务, 用户界面, 定制,而 roommaster 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
用户界面
▾
|
|
|
+
定制
▾
|
|
|
+
宾客沟通
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
硬件问题
▾
|
|
|
−
无缝系统集成
▾
|
|
|
−
后端系统
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #6 13 条评价 | #17 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #9 26 条评价 | #16 0 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 14 条评价 | #29 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 7 条评价 | #28 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #6 26 条评价 | #19 1 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 31 条评价 | #34 0 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 27 条评价 | #23 0 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #10 2 条评价 | #18 0 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #4 26 条评价 | #8 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #8 31 条评价 | #31 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #8 2 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #8 1 条评价 | #12 0 条评价 |
Choosing the right hotel guest app can significantly impact your operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Both Crave Mobile Platform and roommaster Guest App aim to improve guest engagement, streamline services, and boost revenue, but they approach these goals differently. Crave’s platform emphasizes comprehensive service automation and guest interaction, while roommaster focuses on quick check-in, digital keys, and operational automation. Which one aligns more with your hotel’s priorities?
Crave Mobile Platform offers a broader set of features—over 20 exclusive functionalities like web-based access, in-venue ordering, and contactless payments—making it ideal for hotels seeking extensive service options. roommaster offers only two unique features—mobile check-in and guest profiles—and concentrates on operational efficiency. Crave’s high review count (48 reviews in the last 6 months) and a stellar overall rating of 4.75/5 make it a more confidently recommended choice.
Crave’s reviews highlight its intuitive interface, ease of access for guests, and smooth integrations with hotel management systems, leading to higher guest satisfaction. Conversely, roommaster’s reviews primarily focus on the difficulty navigating the platform without a support guide, and its limited recent reviews (2 in the last 6 months) reduce confidence in its current performance. Do you prioritize feature richness and recent positive feedback?
If your hotel needs a versatile, feature-rich platform that enhances guest engagement and offers extensive ancillary options, go with Crave. Its broad feature set, including contactless payments, QR codes, and multi-lingual support, makes it suitable for upscale, boutique, or branded hotels looking to elevate their service menu.
If your hotel’s focus is on simplifying operations, enabling mobile check-in, and reducing front desk workload, roommaster might be appealing. Its core strengths—mobile check-in and guest profiles—are best suited for properties prioritizing operational automation and quick guest onboarding. For a hotel requiring advanced guest engagement tools, Crave is the safer bet.
Crave’s user interface scores a 4.61/5, with many reviews praising its simplicity and customization options, especially for staff and guests. Customers commend Crave’s onboarding process, rating it at 4.57/5, and mention that its intuitive design encourages staff adoption.
roommaster is rated slightly lower at 4.5/5 for ease of use, with reviews noting some difficulty navigating the platform without support. Support availability can be inconsistent, especially during check-in peaks, which impacts staff efficiency. Overall, Crave’s more recent reviews and higher ratings suggest it’s slightly easier to implement and adopt. Edge: Crave.
Crave’s platform boasts 20 exclusive features, including web-app access, digital menus, in-venue ordering, multi-language support, Apple Pay, Google Pay, in-venue ordering, contactless payments, and NFC. These functionalities are designed to enhance guest engagement and service flexibility, especially for hotels aiming to offer a full digital experience.
roommaster offers only two unique features—mobile check-in and guest profiles—focusing on operational automation rather than guest-facing service options. While these are valuable, they don’t match Crave’s extensive suite. The clear edge goes to Crave for its breadth of capabilities, especially for hotels seeking a comprehensive guest app experience.
Crave’s customer support scores a 4.79/5, with reviews praising its quick, helpful responses and proactive service team. Guests and hoteliers alike find Crave’s support team accessible and knowledgeable, which helps resolve issues efficiently.
roommaster’s support rating lags slightly at 4.5/5, with some reviews mentioning difficulty reaching support during urgent situations, especially around check-in times. While generally respectful and knowledgeable, the support experience appears less consistent. For more reliable backup, Crave’s support has a slight edge. Edge: Crave.
Crave offers 17 verified partners, including popular integrations with Oracle Hospitality, Amadeus, and Infor, alongside innovative partners like Kipsu and PressReader. Its extensive integrations facilitate smooth data flow and operational consistency.
roommaster has a broader partner network with 56 verified integrations, including Sage, Volo, and GuestCentric. However, not all integrations directly enhance guest-facing features. For your hotel’s specific needs—especially if you want seamless interactions with existing systems—Crave’s targeted integrations may be more beneficial. Edge: roommaster.
Crave’s recent reviews, with a total of 48 in the last six months and an overall rating of 4.75/5, reflect a high level of satisfaction among diverse hotel segments, particularly luxury, boutique, and branded hotels. Hotels value its ease of use, feature depth, and support.
In contrast, roommaster has only two recent reviews, both describing the platform as difficult to navigate without assistance, and it scores poorly on recent feedback. Its ratings seem outdated or less relevant today. For contemporary user satisfaction, Crave’s higher rating and recent review volume give it a decisive advantage. Edge: Crave.
Crave’s pricing starts at a base of $400, with no mention of monthly fees or implementation costs, indicating a straightforward pricing model. roommaster’s starting price is $1,000, with no additional details on ongoing fees or setup costs.
Given Crave’s lower base price and clear pricing transparency, it generally offers better value for hotels seeking a comprehensive app solution without hidden expenses. If budget is a concern, Crave delivers more features at a lower entry point.
Not ideal if your hotel has minimal service needs or prefers a simple, straightforward check-in solution without extensive features.
Not ideal if your hotel desires a broad array of guest-facing features or extensive customization options beyond basic automation.
Crave Mobile Platform is a versatile, feature-packed guest app that excels in guest engagement, customization, and support, making it suitable for hotels aiming to elevate their service levels. Its comprehensive integration options and recent positive reviews make it a reliable choice for hotels seeking a holistic digital guest experience.
roommaster Guest App offers strong automation features like mobile check-in and guest profiles, primarily suited for hotels prioritizing operational efficiency and quick guest onboarding. Its broader partner network can benefit properties with complex system needs, but the lack of recent reviews and limited features makes it less appealing for hotels seeking a guest-facing experience.
If your hotel wants a well-rounded, high-rated platform with extensive guest features, Crave is the clear winner. For operational automation with minimal guest engagement, roommaster can be considered—but only if your property’s needs are primarily around check-in and staff efficiency.
This detailed comparison should help guide your decision based on your hotel’s specific priorities, budget, and guest experience goals.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | From $1,000/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Crave Mobile Platform 和 roommaster Guest App 共享 5 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 二维码 | ||
| 基于网络(无应用程序) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 当地推荐 | ||
| 手机值机 | ||
| 网络应用 | ||
| 自动翻译(多语言) | ||
| 酒店目录 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 10 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Beginning of each shift, our staff pulls up the dashboard which gives the arrivals, the checkouts, the list of who’s coming in, how many rooms we have as far as dirty, clean, out o..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Crave Interactive 提供卓越的客户服务,响应时间快,支持人员乐于助人。酒店经营者欣赏高效、主动的支持,这有助于迅速解决问题。
虽然用户界面因其对客人友好和直观而受到赞赏,但一些反馈表明它可以更加现代化和可定制,以更好地满足个别酒店的需求。
自定义选项(尤其是菜单更新和访客界面)有限,而且通常需要 Crave Interactive 团队的支持。用户表示希望对自定义有更多控制权。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论提到了对硬件的担忧,特别是平板电脑的耐用性和充电困难。这些问题会影响使用系统时的整体效率和客户满意度。
该系统与其他酒店管理系统(如 Simphony 和 PMS)的集成,使操作更加顺畅,减少了手动输入。这在大型活动期间以及高效管理客房服务时尤其有用。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Crave Mobile Platform 和 roommaster Guest App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Crave Mobile Platform 提供 17 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 roommaster Guest App 提供 56 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Crave Mobile Platform 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Crave Mobile Platform:否。roommaster Guest App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Crave Interactive 的 HT Score 为 75,roommaster 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问