The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 105 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Crave Interactive 表现出色 在 onboarding 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Credit Card Payments and Payments Integrations.
Runtriz 表现出色 在 宾客沟通 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile Checkin and Guest Profiles.
基于 HTR 上 105 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $400/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 67 | 38 |
在分析了 105 条经验证的评价后,Crave Interactive 用户最看重其 客户服务, 用户界面, 定制,而 Runtriz 用户则强调 用户体验, 办理登机手续, 创收。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
+
用户体验
▾
|
|
+
用户界面
▾
|
+
办理登机手续
▾
|
|
+
定制
▾
|
+
创收
▾
|
|
+
订餐应用
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
硬件问题
▾
|
−
可定制性
▾
|
|
−
无缝系统集成
▾
|
−
客人误解
▾
|
|
−
后端系统
▾
|
−
通知和警报
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #6 13 条评价 | #13 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #9 26 条评价 | #3 33 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 14 条评价 | #12 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 7 条评价 | #24 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #6 26 条评价 | #9 11 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 31 条评价 | #15 3 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 27 条评价 | #2 34 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #10 2 条评价 | #2 24 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #4 26 条评价 | #1 37 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #8 31 条评价 | #34 0 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #8 2 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #8 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right hotel guest app can significantly influence your property's guest experience, operational efficiency, and revenue. Crave Mobile Platform and Runtriz are two prominent options, each with strengths and limitations. Both aim to streamline guest interactions, yet they differ in features, user feedback, and market presence. Your decision hinges on your hotel's specific needs: do you prioritize extensive customization and integrations, or focus on seamless communication and ease of use?
While Crave boasts more recent reviews and a higher overall rating from more users, Runtriz remains a strong contender, especially in certain segments. Which platform aligns best with your property’s goals?
Both Crave and Runtriz deliver guest engagement solutions, but their core offerings diverge. Crave emphasizes a broad suite of features like contactless ordering, digital menus, and extensive integration options, aiming to replace traditional service touchpoints with a mobile, app-less interface. Runtriz, on the other hand, focuses on communication, check-in, and upselling, with a notable strength in pre-arrival engagement and real-time guest messaging.
Crave’s approach is more comprehensive with 16 unique features, including POS and NFC contactless payments, while Runtriz offers just three exclusive features, notably mobile check-in and guest profiles. Both platforms support core functions like guest messaging and requests, but Crave’s wider feature set suggests a deeper digital engagement capacity.
However, Crave’s more extensive feature lineup is backed by 48 reviews, none in the last six months, indicating stable but slightly older data. Runtriz has a slightly smaller review count of 37, with reviews in the last six months, providing more current insights.
The choice between them depends on whether your hotel values a broad feature set (Crave) or prefers a simpler, communication-focused tool (Runtriz). Do you want a platform that replaces multiple systems, or one that enhances communication with less complexity?
If your hotel needs a highly customizable, all-in-one engagement platform with extensive payment and ordering features, go with Crave. It’s well-suited for properties aiming to replace multiple systems with a single interface, especially those seeking robust data analytics and marketing capabilities. Its high customer support ratings (4.79/5) and detailed integrations make it ideal for larger or tech-savvy properties.
If your hotel prioritizes guest communication, quick check-in, and simple upselling, Runtriz is the better choice. Its focus on real-time messaging, mobile check-in, and guest profiles makes it suitable for properties that want to enhance guest satisfaction without overhauling existing systems. Runtriz’s scalable solutions serve boutique hotels, resorts, and limited-service properties seeking straightforward, effective guest engagement.
For properties with a tech-forward mindset or complex digital offerings, Crave’s broader feature set makes it a logical pick. Conversely, if your hotel needs a straightforward solution that improves basic communication and guest convenience, Runtriz fits better.
Crave scores slightly higher for ease of use at 4.61/5, with users praising its user-friendly interface and straightforward setup. It has a smooth onboarding process (rated 4.57/5), with many reviews emphasizing how quickly staff adapt to its platform.
Runtriz, with a 4.66/5 rating for ease of use, is similarly praised for its simple, intuitive interface, especially for guest-facing features like messaging and check-in. Users highlight its straightforward implementation and minimal staff training needed.
Both platforms are rated highly, but Crave’s older reviews suggest it may have a slight edge in user experience and onboarding, especially in larger properties with complex needs. Edge: Crave.
Crave’s feature suite surpasses Runtriz with 16 exclusive functions, including contactless payments, digital menus, NFC, and in-venue ordering. These features enable a fully digital guest experience, reducing reliance on physical menus and staff interaction.
Runtriz offers three key features exclusive to its platform: mobile check-in, guest profiles, and app download. These focus on pre-arrival engagement and streamlined check-in processes but lack the extensive retail and payment integrations found in Crave.
The comprehensive feature set of Crave makes it better suited for hotels seeking an all-encompassing guest engagement solution. For simpler needs, Runtriz’s core features may suffice.
Edge: Crave.
Crave’s customer support is highly rated at 4.79/5, with reviews praising quick, helpful responses and proactive service. Hoteliers appreciate the 24/7 support, often citing quick resolution times, like one user noting a response within 2 minutes for a pricing change.
Runtriz, with a support rating of 4.51/5, is also well-regarded but slightly less so. Users commend its ease of implementation but mention occasional issues with notifications and system bugs, which can slow response times.
Given the more recent reviews and higher ratings, Crave’s support appears more reliable and responsive. Edge: Crave.
Crave integrates with 17 verified partners, including industry leaders like Oracle Hospitality, Infor, and Amadeus, along with unique integrations such as Google Pay and POS systems. Its extensive network supports a wide range of hotel management and payment systems.
Runtriz supports 14 verified partners, including Cendyn, SALTO, and OpenKey. While its integrations cover key hotel needs, they are slightly fewer and less diverse than Crave’s.
If integration breadth is critical, Crave’s larger partner network offers more flexibility in connecting with existing hotel systems. Edge: Crave.
Crave, with 48 reviews and a 4.75/5 rating, is favored across multiple segments, with some properties rating it 5/5. Larger hotels and resorts often praise its extensive feature set and support.
Runtriz, with 37 reviews and a slightly higher overall rating of 4.77/5, performs well among boutique and limited-service properties, especially in regions like North America and Europe. Review recency favors Crave, but Runtriz’s high scores in recent months suggest strong current satisfaction.
Overall, Crave’s higher review count and recent feedback make it the more trusted choice. Edge: Crave.
Crave’s pricing starts at a flat rate of $400 per month, with no hidden implementation or setup fees, making it transparent for hotels to budget. Its licensing model is straightforward, with no trial or freemium options.
Runtriz’s pricing remains undisclosed publicly, often customized based on hotel size and needs. It does not offer a free trial or transparent pricing model, which could complicate budgeting.
For clear, predictable costs, Crave provides more certainty. Runtriz’s pricing might vary significantly, requiring direct negotiation.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Crave’s core strength lies in its extensive feature set, integrations, and detailed data analytics, making it suitable for larger, tech-forward properties. Its higher review count, recent positive feedback, and varied functionalities support advanced guest engagement and operational automation.
Runtriz, with its focus on communication, pre-arrival engagement, and ease of use, best serves boutique, resort, and limited-service hotels that prioritize guest interaction over complex digital services. Its simpler implementation and focus on core engagement features make it ideal for properties that want quick improvements without overhauling systems.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, multi-functional platform that can replace several systems, Crave is the clear choice. If your goal is to enhance basic communication and streamline check-in, Runtriz will meet your needs effectively.
This guide aims to help you confidently choose the guest app platform best suited to your hotel’s size, segment, and digital strategy. Both platforms are strong, but your specific operational priorities will determine the best fit.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Crave Mobile Platform 和 Runtriz 共享 9 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 二维码 | ||
| 信用卡付款 | ||
| 基于网络(无应用程序) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 应用下载 | ||
| 手机值机 | ||
| 数字菜单 | ||
| 现场订购 | ||
| 苹果支付 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 7 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Crave Interactive 提供卓越的客户服务,响应时间快,支持人员乐于助人。酒店经营者欣赏高效、主动的支持,这有助于迅速解决问题。
虽然用户界面因其对客人友好和直观而受到赞赏,但一些反馈表明它可以更加现代化和可定制,以更好地满足个别酒店的需求。
自定义选项(尤其是菜单更新和访客界面)有限,而且通常需要 Crave Interactive 团队的支持。用户表示希望对自定义有更多控制权。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论提到了对硬件的担忧,特别是平板电脑的耐用性和充电困难。这些问题会影响使用系统时的整体效率和客户满意度。
该系统与其他酒店管理系统(如 Simphony 和 PMS)的集成,使操作更加顺畅,减少了手动输入。这在大型活动期间以及高效管理客房服务时尤其有用。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Runtriz 因其能够促进酒店员工与客人之间轻松高效的沟通而受到称赞。它支持到达前通知、实时消息和服务请求,从而提高客人满意度和运营效率。
总体而言,该平台对员工和客人来说都十分友好且直观。不过,一些用户指出,界面可以更加现代化和更具视觉吸引力,这表明在审美方面还有待改进。
该工具通过移动预登记和实时通知等功能简化并加快了登记流程,减少了等待时间并提升了客人体验。但是,我们注意到,在正确集成和客人对预登记的理解方面存在一些... 该工具通过移动预登记和实时通知等功能简化并加快了登记流程,减少了等待时间并提升了客人体验。但是,我们注意到,在正确集成和客人对预登记的理解方面存在一些问题。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Runtriz 允许高度自定义设置模板和自动响应,用户发现这对简化操作和增强客户互动大有裨益。但是,建议改进这些功能的后端支持。
有些客人误解了入住前流程,以为这意味着他们已经完全入住,从而导致混乱和不满。更清晰的沟通和指示可以缓解这些问题。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Crave Mobile Platform 和 Runtriz 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Crave Mobile Platform 提供 17 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Runtriz 提供 14 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Runtriz 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Crave Mobile Platform:否。Runtriz:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Crave Interactive 的 HT Score 为 75,Runtriz 的为 21。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问