The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 67 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Crave Interactive 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Payments and Guest Messaging.
Xotelier (Guest App) 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 67 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $400/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 67 | 0 |
在分析了 67 条经验证的评价后,Crave Interactive 用户最看重其 客户服务, 用户界面, 定制,而 Xotelier (Guest App) 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
Xotelier (Guest App)
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
用户界面
▾
|
|
|
+
定制
▾
|
|
|
+
宾客沟通
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
硬件问题
▾
|
|
|
−
无缝系统集成
▾
|
|
|
−
后端系统
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Xotelier (Guest App)
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #6 13 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #9 26 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 14 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 7 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Xotelier (Guest App)
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #6 26 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 31 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 27 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #10 2 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Xotelier (Guest App)
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #4 26 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #8 31 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #8 2 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #8 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right guest engagement app can dramatically impact your hotel's operations and guest satisfaction. Crave Mobile Platform by Crave Interactive and Xotelier (Guest App) both aim to enhance guest experience through mobile solutions; however, their offerings and backing differ significantly. Crave's platform is more established, with a broader feature set and a stronger review presence, while Xotelier's solution appears more tailored toward custom development with less market traction. Do you need a proven system with comprehensive features or a flexible, bespoke app?
Crave Interactive’s platform is a well-reviewed, full-featured solution with 48 reviews, a high overall rating (4.75/5), and recent positive feedback, especially in North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific. Xotelier’s Guest App, with no reviews or ratings available, offers custom development tailored to specific hotel needs but lacks proven market performance. While Crave’s app emphasizes ease of engagement and automation, Xotelier’s platform is about bespoke development and technical support. Which approach aligns more with your hotel’s priorities?
Crave’s platform includes 25 unique features like mobile payments, in-venue ordering, QR codes, and multi-lingual support, making it a comprehensive choice for hotels seeking ready-to-deploy capabilities. Xotelier’s offering, lacking specific feature details, leans toward custom solutions that may include flexible functionalities but require more development time and investment. Are your hotel’s needs best served by a ready-made solution or a tailored application?
While Crave’s reviews praise its user interface, customer support, and integration with existing hotel systems, some mention that the back-end system could be more modern and that hardware durability is a concern. Xotelier’s status as a less-reviewed, less-known provider makes it difficult to assess support quality and feature robustness. Do you prioritize proven performance or bespoke development with tailored support?
In summary, Crave's platform has a clear edge with a robust feature set, recent reviews, and a proven track record. Xotelier’s approach is more about custom solutions, which might fit niche needs but lack the validation of a large user base. Which option aligns better with your hotel’s operational maturity and strategic goals?
Edge: Crave Mobile Platform.
If your hotel needs a reliable, feature-rich guest engagement system ready to integrate with your existing operations, Crave is the better choice. With 48 reviews, a 4.75/5 overall rating, and features like mobile payments, QR codes, multi-language support, and in-venue ordering, Crave appeals to hotels looking for a comprehensive, proven solution. Its high NPS score of 9.15/10 and recent reviews confirm its strong market presence.
Conversely, if your hotel requires a highly customized app tailored to unique workflows, branding, or specific services, Xotelier’s platform might serve you better. Its strength lies in bespoke app development, offering technical support for publication and ongoing management, though the lack of reviews makes its performance and customer satisfaction less certain. If you are comfortable with a development-first approach, Xotelier could be a fit.
For hotels in need of a plug-and-play, scalable solution with a track record of success, Crave is the clear choice. If your team has specific, complex requirements and prefers a tailor-made app, Xotelier’s bespoke offerings may be worth exploring, but be prepared for longer implementation timelines and less proven results.
Edge: Crave Mobile Platform.
Crave’s platform scores highly on ease of use, with a rating of 4.61/5 based on extensive reviews, and users praise its intuitive interface and proactive onboarding process. Reviews highlight that staff find it straightforward to train on, and guests appreciate its simplicity, with some noting the QR code access is particularly user-friendly.
Xotelier’s platform, lacking detailed reviews or user feedback, makes it difficult to assess its ease of use. Its focus on custom development suggests that the user experience will depend heavily on the bespoke design and implementation process, which can vary in complexity. Without concrete feedback, it’s safer to say Crave’s platform is more predictable in usability.
Edge: Crave Mobile Platform.
Crave’s platform boasts 25 unique features, including web-based access, multi-lingual support, mobile payments, request management, in-venue ordering, QR codes, Apple Pay, Google Pay, POS integration, and contactless ordering. These capabilities enable seamless guest service automation across diverse hotel types, making it a versatile solution.
Xotelier’s Guest App does not specify feature count or list functionalities, focusing instead on custom development tailored to hotel needs. While this allows flexibility, it leaves uncertainty about which features are included out-of-the-box. For hotels wanting a comprehensive, ready-to-use suite, Crave’s extensive features provide a clear advantage.
Edge: Crave Mobile Platform.
Crave’s support ratings are strong, with a 4.79/5 customer support score, and reviews cite quick response times and proactive assistance. Clients appreciate the 24/7 support, with one reviewer noting, “Their response times are absolutely incredible,” which is critical during operational issues.
Xotelier’s support quality isn’t documented through reviews, making it difficult to gauge. The company’s smaller size and focus on custom development suggest support quality could vary and depend on ongoing contracts. Based on available data, Crave’s support stands out as more reliable.
Edge: Crave Mobile Platform.
Crave’s platform integrates with 17 verified partners, including Interel, Infor, Oracle Hospitality, Amadeus, and others, facilitating smooth operation within existing hotel tech stacks. This extensive integration footprint allows for easier automation and data sharing.
Xotelier offers no publicly listed integrations, highlighting its focus on custom solutions rather than out-of-the-box connectivity. If integration is a priority, Crave’s established partner network provides a significant advantage.
Edge: Crave Mobile Platform.
Crave’s reviews consistently praise its ease of use, support, and feature set, with a 4.75/5 overall rating and a 93% likelihood to recommend. Its recent reviews reinforce its reputation among hotels across segments, especially in North America and Europe, with an average hotel rating of 4.69/5 from 42 reviews.
Xotelier’s lack of reviews makes it impossible to assess user satisfaction. Its personalized, bespoke approach may appeal to niche hotels but doesn’t demonstrate proven hotel ratings or satisfaction levels in the market.
Edge: Crave Mobile Platform.
Crave’s platform charges a flat fee of $400, with no additional implementation or monthly charges, making it straightforward and predictable. Xotelier’s pricing is not publicly available; since it focuses on custom app development, costs will vary based on scope, complexity, and ongoing support.
If predictable costs are vital, Crave offers clarity with its flat fee. For tailored solutions, Xotelier’s variable pricing could be advantageous but less transparent.
Not ideal if your hotel has highly unique workflows requiring bespoke app development or minimal budget flexibility.
Not ideal if you prefer a quick, out-of-the-box solution or lack the internal resources for custom app management.
Crave Mobile Platform stands out as the more reliable, feature-rich guest app with proven market success, extensive integrations, and high user satisfaction. It’s best suited for properties seeking a scalable, ready-to-use solution that enhances guest engagement and operational efficiency.
Xotelier offers a flexible, custom development approach, ideal for hotels with specific needs and resources for bespoke app management. However, its lack of reviews and market presence makes it a riskier choice unless your hotel has the capacity to handle custom tech projects.
For hotels prioritizing proven performance, extensive features, and strong support, Crave is the clear winner. If your hotel values bespoke development above all, Xotelier could be worth exploring, but proceed cautiously given the limited market validation.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
Xotelier (Guest App)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Crave Mobile Platform 和 Xotelier (Guest App) 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
Xotelier (Guest App)
|
|---|---|---|
| 付款 | ||
| 基于网络(无应用程序) | ||
| 客房服务订购 | ||
| 自动翻译(多语言) | ||
| 请求管理 | ||
| 酒店目录 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 13 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Crave Interactive 提供卓越的客户服务,响应时间快,支持人员乐于助人。酒店经营者欣赏高效、主动的支持,这有助于迅速解决问题。
虽然用户界面因其对客人友好和直观而受到赞赏,但一些反馈表明它可以更加现代化和可定制,以更好地满足个别酒店的需求。
自定义选项(尤其是菜单更新和访客界面)有限,而且通常需要 Crave Interactive 团队的支持。用户表示希望对自定义有更多控制权。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论提到了对硬件的担忧,特别是平板电脑的耐用性和充电困难。这些问题会影响使用系统时的整体效率和客户满意度。
该系统与其他酒店管理系统(如 Simphony 和 PMS)的集成,使操作更加顺畅,减少了手动输入。这在大型活动期间以及高效管理客房服务时尤其有用。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Crave Mobile Platform 和 Xotelier (Guest App) 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Crave Mobile Platform 提供 17 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Xotelier (Guest App) 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Crave Mobile Platform 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Crave Mobile Platform:否。Xotelier (Guest App):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Crave Interactive 的 HT Score 为 75,Xotelier (Guest App) 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问