The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店预订软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #7 5 条评价 | #2 28 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #16 0 条评价 | #1 66 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 36 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #12 0 条评价 | #1 33 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #10 3 条评价 | #1 96 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #11 2 条评价 | #1 67 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #13 0 条评价 | #1 53 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #10 0 条评价 | #1 13 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #13 0 条评价 | #1 115 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #3 26 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #2 5 条评价 | #1 9 条评价 |
| 中东 | #11 0 条评价 | #5 4 条评价 |
Choosing the right hotel reservations software can be daunting, especially when comparing two industry leaders like DJUBO and Cendyn CRS. Both products aim to streamline your operations, improve revenue, and enhance guest experiences, but they differ significantly in features, integrations, and market focus. Your decision hinges on specific needs, hotel size, and strategic priorities.
While DJUBO offers an all-in-one platform with a strong presence in Asia-Pacific and a very recent surge in reviews, Cendyn CRS boasts extensive integrations and a broader international footprint, especially in North America. Which of these solutions aligns best with your hotel’s goals and existing systems?
DJUBO and Cendyn CRS both serve as central reservations systems, but they diverge in their core strengths. DJUBO is an integrated hospitality management platform that combines PMS, channel management, booking engine, POS, and revenue tools in one package. It’s favored for its ease of use, affordability, and a more modern interface, with a recent review count of 19 and an impressive 97% likelihood to recommend.
Cendyn CRS, by contrast, is a more traditional, feature-rich CRS with over 136 reviews, mostly recent, and a high overall rating of 4.47/5. It excels in connecting with over 1,000 distribution partners and offers advanced dynamic pricing, content management, and PMS connectivity. Which system offers the operational scope and reliability your hotel needs today?
The key question: Does your property benefit from a holistic platform that covers all core functions, or do you require a highly connected, flexible CRS with extensive partner integration?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, all-in-one management system—especially if you’re in Asia-Pacific, Africa, or North America—DJUBO is the better choice. It’s ideal for independent and boutique hotels seeking an affordable, easy-to-adopt platform with integrated POS, guest feedback, and revenue management tools. Its recent reviews highlight ease of use and responsive support, making it suitable for properties that prioritize operational simplicity.
Conversely, if your hotel relies heavily on extensive distribution, advanced dynamic pricing, or operates in North America and Europe, Cendyn CRS should be your focus. Its deeper integrations, over 1000 partners, and features like content management and geotargeted pricing cater to large, complex properties or chains that need sophisticated rate and inventory control.
In summary, opt for DJUBO if your hotel leans toward streamlined, all-in-one management, and choose Cendyn CRS if your priorities are connectivity, scalability, and advanced rate management.
DJUBO scores higher for ease of use, with a rating of 4.74/5 versus Cendyn’s 4.34/5. Recent reviews praise DJUBO’s intuitive interface, especially its mobile app, and its straightforward onboarding process. Hoteliers mention that DJUBO's modular structure makes it simple to adopt and operate, with support staff praised for responsiveness.
Cendyn CRS, while generally user-friendly, has some complaints about interface issues, particularly with connection delays and slow web portals. Users note that support can be inconsistent, which impacts the overall experience.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO offers a broader set of features—16 exclusive to it—including a channel manager, multi-currency, multilingual support, PMS, booking engine, POS, group booking, revenue management, and guest feedback tools. Its feature count totals 30, making it a versatile, all-in-one platform.
Cendyn, with 7 unique features such as dynamic pricing, content management, PMS connectivity, and geotargeted pricing, focuses more on rate flexibility and distribution. Its feature set is tailored for larger properties needing sophisticated rate and inventory controls.
Ultimately, DJUBO’s richer feature set provides more operational tools out-of-the-box, giving it the edge for hotels wanting comprehensive management.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO’s support ratings (4.61/5) are slightly higher than Cendyn’s (4.54/5), and recent reviews highlight its proactive, responsive team. Hoteliers praise DJUBO’s post-sale support for being timely and helpful, especially during onboarding.
Cendyn’s support is also well-rated, but some reviews mention delays in issue resolution and inconsistent responsiveness. Users have expressed frustration with support responsiveness and interface glitches, impacting daily operations.
Edge: DJUBO.
Cendyn boasts over 116 verified partners, including major global distribution channels like Tripadvisor, Siteminder, and many property management systems. Its ecosystem is extensive, supporting large-scale, multi-channel distribution needs.
DJUBO has only 3 verified partners, including Tripadvisor and Simplotel, but it covers core functionalities well enough for smaller hotels. Its limited integrations may be a drawback for hotels with complex distribution requirements.
Edge: Cendyn CRS.
DJUBO’s recent reviews, primarily from small to mid-sized hotels, reflect a perfect 5/5 rating and a 97% recommendation rate, with hotel segments like independent properties rating it highly. Its ease of use and affordability resonate well with boutique and regional hotels.
Cendyn CRS, with more reviews, especially from luxury and chain hotels, maintains a solid 4.47/5 rating and 89% recommendation rate. Larger hotels value its advanced features, though some note interface issues.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO does not publicly list pricing, but its model appears to be modular and potentially more affordable for small to mid-sized hotels. Its no-implementation fee and no-trial policy suggest transparency and flexibility.
Cendyn CRS charges a base price of $700/month, with no free tier or trial. Its cost is more suited for larger hotels or chains with a bigger budget for advanced capabilities.
In terms of overall value, DJUBO offers a more cost-effective entry point for smaller properties, while Cendyn’s investment suits larger, more complex operations.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive integrations, complex multi-property management, or advanced rate customization.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, boutique, or in regions with limited Cendyn presence.
DJUBO offers a straightforward, integrated platform designed for small to mid-sized properties, emphasizing ease of use, affordability, and quick onboarding. Its recent review volume and high rating make it a trusted choice for independent hotels and resorts seeking simplicity.
Cendyn CRS provides a comprehensive, highly connected solution with extensive integrations and advanced rate management features. It’s best suited for large properties, chains, or hotels with complex distribution and revenue strategies seeking scalability.
If operational simplicity and recent positive feedback are your priorities, DJUBO is the clear choice. For extensive distribution, customization, and scalability, Cendyn CRS is more appropriate.
In conclusion, choose DJUBO for smaller, independent properties prioritizing ease and value. Opt for Cendyn CRS if your hotel operates at scale and needs deep connectivity and control.
This comparison should guide your decision, aligning your hotel’s specific operational needs with the strengths of each platform.
我们分析了 1 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Pegasus CRS has ensured that our direct booking channels remain competitive at all times. We create and update all our rate plans first in the CRS and then we distribute these to o..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
支持团队的及时性和有效性经常受到称赞。用户对快速的响应时间和解决问题的专业帮助表示赞赏,这提高了他们对系统的整体体验。
Pegasus 的预订引擎因其简单性和用户友好性而备受赞誉,无论是对酒店员工还是客人而言都是如此。用户非常欣赏它创建价格计划、管理预订和浏览系统是多么简单,这... Pegasus 的预订引擎因其简单性和用户友好性而备受赞誉,无论是对酒店员工还是客人而言都是如此。用户非常欣赏它创建价格计划、管理预订和浏览系统是多么简单,这大大简化了预订流程。
许多评论都指出,Pegasus 在处理价格方案配置方面非常有效,它提供了广泛的可定制性,以满足不同酒店的需求。这包括从现有方案中得出价格并进行批量更新,从而改... 许多评论都指出,Pegasus 在处理价格方案配置方面非常有效,它提供了广泛的可定制性,以满足不同酒店的需求。这包括从现有方案中得出价格并进行批量更新,从而改善收益管理。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户认为,预订引擎和价格管理功能的某些方面可以通过进一步定制来改善。建议包括布局设计更加灵活,以及无需大量支持干预即可集成个性化修改的能力。
一些评论强调了界面问题,尤其是像 SiteMinder 这样的集成系统。用户提到需要定期刷新,偶尔会出现连接中断,这会导致费率和库存管理不一致。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Djubo (CRS) 和 Cendyn CRS 共享许多核心 Hotel Reservations Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Djubo (CRS) 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Cendyn CRS 提供 116 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Djubo (CRS) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Djubo (CRS):否。Cendyn CRS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Reservations Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。DJUBO 的 HT Score 为 0,Cendyn 的为 88。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问