The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 66 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
DJUBO 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping module and Guest Feedback Management.
Profitroom 表现出色 在 用户友好性和直观性 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Reporting Dashboard.
基于 HTR 上 66 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $1,300/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 20 | 46 |
在分析了 66 条经验证的评价后,DJUBO 用户最看重其 ,而 Profitroom 用户则强调 用户友好性和直观性, crm 和个性化, 系统更新和功能开发。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好性和直观性
▾
|
|
|
+
CRM 和个性化
▾
|
|
|
+
系统更新和功能开发
▾
|
|
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
集成挑战
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店预订软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #7 5 条评价 | #4 10 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #16 0 条评价 | #3 29 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #5 4 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #12 0 条评价 | #3 3 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #10 3 条评价 | #5 12 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #11 2 条评价 | #4 20 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #13 0 条评价 | #6 10 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #10 0 条评价 | #2 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #13 0 条评价 | #8 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #2 31 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #2 5 条评价 | #5 1 条评价 |
| 中东 | #11 0 条评价 | #7 1 条评价 |
Choosing between DJUBO and Profitroom Suite involves weighing a unified management platform against an advanced reservation system. DJUBO offers an all-in-one cloud-based platform that consolidates PMS, channel management, booking engine, POS, and revenue management into a single interface. Profitroom, meanwhile, focuses on optimizing the guest booking journey and boosting direct reservations through its comprehensive CRS and marketing tools. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize operational integration or guest experience and direct booking growth.
Both products aim to streamline hotel operations and increase revenue, but they approach this goal differently. DJUBO emphasizes operational control across multiple functions, while Profitroom concentrates on driving direct bookings with marketing and CRM capabilities. Which aligns more with your hotel's immediate needs—integrated management or enhanced guest acquisition?
DJUBO’s strength lies in its all-in-one management approach, consolidating PMS, channel manager, booking engine, POS, and more into a single platform. It’s designed for hoteliers seeking a centralized system that simplifies complex operations, especially for multi-property or independent hotels. Meanwhile, Profitroom excels in the guest journey, offering tools like a strong CRS, marketing automation, and booking engine features tailored for increasing direct reservations.
DJUBO’s 19 reviews—most recent—show an overall 5/5 rating, with users praising its ease of management, real-time visibility, and modular modules. Profitroom, with 42 reviews, holds a low rating of 0/5, but this appears to be a reporting anomaly; its positive features include robust marketing support and an intuitive booking engine. Given the more recent and numerous reviews, DJUBO’s proven track record and high satisfaction make it a more reliable choice for hotels seeking operational control. Are you better served by a unified platform or a guest-focused reservation system?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive property management and operations platform, DJUBO is the clear choice. Its 17 shared features and 13 exclusive modules—like POS, revenue management, and multi-currency support—serve hotels that want a single system to handle everything from reservations to back-office tasks efficiently. Its user reviews highlight a highly intuitive interface and responsive support, making it suitable for independent hotels or groups that want control without extra systems.
Conversely, if your priority is increasing direct bookings, personalized marketing, and enhancing the guest booking experience, Profitroom is better. Its focus on the booking journey, CRM, and sales tools appeals to hotels aiming to bypass OTAs and foster loyalty. Although its overall rating is low, recent reviews underline its strengths in driving revenue and simplifying online reservations. For property types prioritizing booking growth, Profitroom’s features and positive feedback make it attractive.
DJUBO’s ease of use is reflected in a high UI/UX rating of 4.74/5, with users emphasizing its straightforward onboarding and modular design. Its recent reviews praise quick setup and intuitive navigation, especially for managing multiple properties and modules simultaneously. Support responsiveness is also highlighted as a key benefit, making staff adoption smoother for teams familiar with property management software.
Profitroom’s platform scores slightly lower at 4.69/5, with users noting its user-friendly interface and helpful training resources. Reviewers appreciate how simple it is for staff to learn and operate the booking engine and CRM features, despite some reports of setup complexity. While both are highly rated, the slight edge goes to DJUBO for its more recent positive user experiences with onboarding and operational clarity.
DJUBO boasts 30 features, including a channel manager, POS, PMS, revenue management, and multi-lingual support, making it a true all-in-one solution. Its additional modules like group booking, house-keeping, feedback management, and native email marketing provide extensive operational flexibility. Users consistently cite these comprehensive features as integral to their daily management routines.
Profitroom offers 20 features, with standout additions like TMC management, content management, and a reporting dashboard. While fewer than DJUBO, these features focus on enhancing the guest experience and marketing. However, the limited number of unique features in Profitroom suggests it is more specialized. The clear advantage in feature breadth and variety goes to DJUBO, making it suitable for properties needing an integrated management system.
DJUBO’s customer support scores 4.61/5, with reviews highlighting their responsiveness and helpfulness. Hoteliers report post-sale support as prompt and professional, especially praising onboarding and ongoing assistance. One review states, “DJUBO support is very responsive and helps us resolve issues quickly,” indicating reliable service.
Profitroom’s support, rated at 4.55/5, also receives praise for helpfulness and quick responses. Reviewers mention that personalized service and trainer availability enhance their experience, though some note support delays in resolving complex issues. Overall, DJUBO’s support slightly outperforms Profitroom’s, especially given its higher review count and recent positive feedback.
DJUBO integrates with 3 verified partners, sharing one with Profitroom—Tripadvisor—while offering unique integrations like Simplotel. Its partners include essential channels and tools tailored for Indian and Asian markets, supporting multi-currency and multi-lingual operations.
Profitroom’s integration network is extensive, with 66 verified partners covering OTAs, channel managers, and marketing platforms. It supports many global integrations, including Mirai, HotelTime, and Sojern, facilitating broader connectivity. The significant difference in partner counts favors Profitroom, making it more adaptable for hotels with diverse technical ecosystems. Edge: Profitroom.
DJUBO’s 19 recent reviews show a perfect 5/5 rating, with independent hotels and resorts praising its operational control and ease of use. Its overall 97% recommendation rate underscores high satisfaction, especially among boutique and independent properties.
Profitroom’s 42 reviews, however, are predominantly low-rated with a 0/5 score, reflecting issues rather than quality. Its users in the luxury and resort segments value its booking and marketing features, but the overall rating indicates poor user experience or dissatisfaction. Given the recent reviews and higher ratings, DJUBO is clearly the more highly-rated product.
DJUBO does not publicly list its pricing, suggesting that it is customizable or based on specific modules selected. It likely operates on a quotation basis tailored to hotel size and needs.
Profitroom charges a base fee of $1,300 per month, with no free tier or trial, emphasizing its position as a premium solution. Additional fees may apply for setup or extra modules, but overall costs seem fixed at the subscription level. For transparency, DJUBO’s pricing model is not explicitly disclosed, while Profitroom’s is straightforward but higher.
DJUBO is the clearer choice for hoteliers seeking a single, comprehensive platform that manages every aspect of operations. Its high user ratings, extensive feature set, and recent reviews make it a dependable solution for both independent and multi-property hotels.
Profitroom is best suited for hotels and groups prioritizing direct bookings and marketing automation. Its robust CRS, sales tools, and booking engine are ideal for properties aiming to improve guest experience and increase revenue, but its lower overall ratings suggest it might require more effort to implement smoothly.
For hotels needing operational control with proven satisfaction, DJUBO stands out. If your focus is on guest acquisition and loyalty through sophisticated booking and marketing solutions, Profitroom can deliver—though with some caveats based on recent feedback.
酒店预订软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,300/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Djubo (CRS) 和 Profitroom Suite 共享 17 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| TMC管理 | ||
| 内容管理 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 报告仪表板 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 销售点 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 4 项功能存在差异。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Profitroom 平台因其用户友好且直观的设计而受到称赞,让员工可以轻松导航和实施。入职流程和培训可确保员工熟悉其功能。
CRM 系统是一项出色的功能,它使酒店经营者能够有效地管理客人关系,根据客人的喜好定制服务。这可以提高满意度和忠诚度,但有些用户希望 CRM 具有更大的灵活性... CRM 系统是一项出色的功能,它使酒店经营者能够有效地管理客人关系,根据客人的喜好定制服务。这可以提高满意度和忠诚度,但有些用户希望 CRM 具有更大的灵活性和编辑功能。
用户很欣赏 Profitroom 定期发布和推出新功能,让其紧跟现代技术趋势。不过,有些人期待更全面的统计工具和新闻通讯改进。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户表示,Profitroom 与现有酒店系统的集成存在困难,这可能会影响运营效率和跨系统工作流程。具体不满之处包括系统间映射的限制以及 CRM 灵活性不足。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Djubo (CRS) 和 Profitroom Suite 共享许多核心 Hotel Reservations Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Djubo (CRS) 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Profitroom Suite 提供 66 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Profitroom Suite 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Djubo (CRS):否。Profitroom Suite:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Reservations Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。DJUBO 的 HT Score 为 0,Profitroom 的为 95。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问