The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店预订软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #7 5 条评价 | #6 9 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #16 0 条评价 | #4 28 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 11 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #12 0 条评价 | #5 3 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #10 3 条评价 | #3 34 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #11 2 条评价 | #5 25 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #13 0 条评价 | #5 18 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #10 0 条评价 | #7 4 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #13 0 条评价 | #3 34 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #4 18 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #2 5 条评价 | #7 1 条评价 |
| 中东 | #11 0 条评价 | #6 2 条评价 |
Choosing between DJUBO and SHR Group’s CRS hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs and technological environment. Both products aim to streamline reservation management, but they approach this goal differently: DJUBO offers a comprehensive all-in-one platform, while SHR emphasizes distribution and channel management with deep integration capabilities. Your decision should be driven by whether your priorities are a unified system or specialized distribution control.
What are your hotel’s immediate needs—do you want a single platform that covers all operations, or a powerful distribution hub that integrates seamlessly with existing systems? Let’s explore which product aligns best with your goals.
DJUBO's strength lies in its all-in-one hospitality platform, combining PMS, channel management, booking engine, POS, and revenue tools into a single system. SHR Group, by contrast, excels in distributing your hotel’s rates and inventory across multiple channels, with a focus on connectivity and real-time updates.
While DJUBO has a higher overall rating (5/5 vs. SHR’s 4.77/5) and a broader feature set (16 unique features compared to SHR’s 6), SHR boasts more recent reviews and a larger review base (49 reviews versus 19). This suggests SHR's user feedback is more current and representative of ongoing product improvements. Are you prioritizing a full management system or a distribution-focused solution?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive platform that manages every aspect—from reservations to POS and housekeeping—DJUBO is the clear choice. Its modular design, integrated revenue management, and multi-currency/multilingual features suit hotels looking for a unified system.
However, if your primary goal is robust distribution, channel synchronization, and seamless integration with existing PMS and RMS systems, SHR Group offers a more specialized solution. Its extensive partner network and real-time inventory updates make it ideal for hotels heavily dependent on third-party channels and looking to optimize revenue through distribution.
DJUBO’s UI scores a 4.74/5, with users praising its look, feel, and app experience, though some note room for interface improvements. Its onboarding score of 4.61/5 suggests a relatively smooth setup process, and the platform’s clean navigation is appreciated, despite some reports of feature gaps.
SHR Group's system scores slightly lower in ease of use (4.61/5), but users emphasize its simplicity compared to more cumbersome systems like iHotelier. Support responsiveness and support team professionalism bolster its usability.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO offers 16 distinct features, including channel management, multi-currency/multilingual support, property management, booking engine, POS, revenue management, and guest feedback tools. Its feature set is broad, covering operational needs for both independent and multi-property hotels.
SHR Group provides 6 core features, focusing on multi-property management, content control, PMS connectivity, centralized user roles, and reporting dashboards. While its features are fewer, they are highly specialized for distribution and management.
The feature count favors DJUBO, but SHR’s targeted capabilities in distribution and content management are equally valuable depending on your hotel’s priorities.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO’s support scores 4.61/5, with reviews citing consistent responsiveness and helpful post-sale assistance. Users note that support can be proactive, although some mention reporting capabilities could improve.
SHR Group’s slightly higher score of 4.76/5 and testimonials highlight its dedicated, personalized service and quick responses. Several users describe SHR’s support as industry-leading, especially during complex implementations.
While both offer strong support, SHR’s recent reviews and higher support rating indicate that their customer service may be more aligned with current user expectations.
Edge: SHR Group.
DJUBO connects with 3 verified partners, including TripAdvisor and Simplotel, with only one shared integration. SHR Group integrates with over 81 verified partners, including major players like Criton, Priority Software, and OpenHotel, offering extensive third-party connectivity.
If integration breadth is crucial, especially with PMS, RMS, CRM, and payment systems, SHR Group’s larger partner network provides more options to customize your tech stack.
Edge: SHR Group.
DJUBO’s reviews, although fewer, are very recent—13 within the last six months—showing a high likelihood to recommend (97%) and a perfect 5/5 rating. Users praise the platform for its interface and modular approach, especially at multi-property hotels.
SHR Group’s larger review base (49 reviews) includes many positive comments, particularly praising support and distribution features. Its recent reviews also reflect continued product evolution, but overall ratings are slightly lower (4.77/5).
Given the recency and uniformity of DJUBO’s reviews, the current user sentiment favors DJUBO’s overall rating.
Both products do not publish explicit pricing details; they operate on custom quotes based on hotel size, number of properties, and feature needs. No free tier or trial information is available for either, making direct cost comparisons difficult.
Your best approach is to request quotes from both vendors to understand their value propositions and how pricing aligns with your budget.
DJUBO offers a comprehensive, all-in-one solution ideal for hotels seeking to unify operations under a single platform. Its broad feature set and recent positive reviews make it suitable for multi-property and independent hotels aiming for streamlined management.
SHR Group specializes in distribution and connectivity, with a significant partner network and support reputation. It’s better suited for hotels that want to maximize revenue through channel optimization and integrated distribution, especially when already using PMS and RMS systems.
If your hotel needs a single, integrated platform that covers all operational bases, DJUBO is the stronger choice. For hotels focused on distribution, rate updates, and multi-channel management, SHR Group is your best bet.
In summary, choose DJUBO for full management integration and operational control. Opt for SHR Group if your priority is distribution excellence and extensive third-party connectivity.
This comparison should guide you toward the product that best fits your hotel’s current priorities and future growth plans. Both platforms have distinct strengths—your decision will depend on whether operational breadth or distribution depth is more critical to your success.
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
SHR 的客户成功团队经常被称赞为杰出,提供主动和定制的支持。这种级别的服务有助于处理日常咨询和重大项目,大大简化了酒店运营的管理。
SHR 的系统(尤其是 CRS 和 CRO)经常被描述为用户友好且易于操作。这种易用性有助于提高运营效率并加快新用户的入门速度。
无缝集成第三方系统(如 PMS 和其他酒店管理工具)是 SHR 的一大优势。用户认为这对于顺畅运营和高效管理至关重要。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论提到,SHR 系统需要提供更广泛、更方便用户使用的报告选项。这包括临时分析功能和对关键指标的更详细洞察。
一些用户表示希望获得更全面的基于云的体验,以最大限度地减少升级期间的停机时间。这将使 SHR 符合现代技术趋势并提高系统可用性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Djubo (CRS) 和 SHR Central Reservation System (CRS) 共享许多核心 Hotel Reservations Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Djubo (CRS) 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 SHR Central Reservation System (CRS) 提供 81 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Djubo (CRS) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Djubo (CRS):否。SHR Central Reservation System (CRS):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Reservations Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。DJUBO 的 HT Score 为 0,SHR Group 的为 49。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问