The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 渠道经理 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #20 7 条评价 | #7 66 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #34 0 条评价 | #14 21 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #13 5 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #22 0 条评价 | #14 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #27 3 条评价 | #9 38 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #25 4 条评价 | #8 42 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #37 0 条评价 | #9 24 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #31 0 条评价 | #6 25 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #34 0 条评价 | #6 21 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #3 194 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #11 7 条评价 | #25 1 条评价 |
| 中东 | #21 1 条评价 | #20 2 条评价 |
Choosing between DJUBO and eviivo Suite™ CM hinges on your hotel's specific needs and operational scope. DJUBO offers an all-in-one platform that combines PMS, channel management, booking engine, POS, and more, aiming to unify your management under a single system. Conversely, eviivo Suite™ CM specializes in connectivity with OTAs, streamlining distribution and booking management for smaller or multi-property operators. Which of these approaches aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
Both products aim to simplify operations and maximize revenue, but they do so from different angles. DJUBO provides a comprehensive management solution, while eviivo excels in expanding your online presence and reducing distribution complexity. Are you seeking an integrated system or a focused channel management tool?
DJUBO is designed for hotels that want an all-encompassing platform, managing reservations, revenue, and guest feedback from a single interface. Its suite of features covers property management, POS, and housekeeping, making it ideal for hotels with multiple services or complex operations. eviivo, however, is optimized for properties that prioritize distribution and booking automation, especially vacation rentals, B&Bs, and small hotels. Do you need a broad management system or targeted OTA connectivity?
While DJUBO boasts a higher overall rating (4.75/5) based on 18 reviews, eviivo’s zero-star rating reflects limited recent user feedback and a smaller review count (231 reviews). The more recent reviews favor eviivo’s extensive integration network and ease of use, but DJUBO’s recent ratings indicate a loyal customer base valuing its features. Which approach fits your operational complexity?
If your hotel needs an all-in-one management platform capable of handling reservations, POS, revenue management, and guest feedback, DJUBO is your best bet. It’s suited for independent hotels, resorts, or multi-property groups that want centralized control across all operations. If your primary focus is expanding online visibility and managing multiple OTAs efficiently, eviivo’s channel management, automation, and user-friendly interface are more appropriate, especially if you run small hotels, B&Bs, or vacation rentals.
For hotels seeking a comprehensive, unified system that reduces vendor fragmentation, go with DJUBO. If your goal is to grow bookings through OTA connections and streamline distribution, opt for eviivo. Does your hotel need an all-in-one platform or specialized distribution tools?
DJUBO scores 4.86/5 for ease of use, with users praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Reviewers mention that the platform’s clean design makes managing reservations, rates, and guest profiles simple, even for less tech-savvy staff. Support and onboarding are rated highly at 4.74/5, with many users citing quick, helpful assistance.
eviivo’s interface is also rated favorably at 4.65/5, with users appreciating its simplicity and quick setup. Reviewers highlight that the platform makes managing multiple OTAs and bookings straightforward, though some note that mobile functionality could be improved. Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO offers 24 features exclusive to its platform, including a PMS, booking engine, POS, revenue management, guest feedback, native email marketing, and metasearch connectivity. It also provides modules for group bookings, dynamic pricing, and comprehensive reporting dashboards—features that eviivo doesn’t include.
eviivo, in comparison, does not have its own PMS or revenue management tools but excels in OTA integrations, guest messaging, and automation. Its core strength is connection and distribution, not property management. For a hotel seeking an all-in-one system, DJUBO leads; for those prioritizing channel connectivity, eviivo is more suitable. Edge: DJUBO.
Both platforms are rated 4.78/5 for customer support, with reviews praising their responsiveness and helpfulness. DJUBO’s users mention consistent support during onboarding and ongoing use, often highlighting post-sale assistance as responsive and effective.
eviivo users also commend the support team, especially the onboarding process, but some reviews indicate room for improvement in personalized assistance and issue monitoring. Since support quality appears comparable in ratings, the choice depends on your preferred communication style. Edge: Tie.
eviivo boasts 32 verified integrations with major OTAs, payment providers, and technology partners, giving it a broader network than DJUBO’s 3 verified partners. Common integrations include Tripadvisor, with eviivo also connecting to Experience Hotel, Hotelchamp, and PriceLabs.
DJUBO’s integrations focus on essential partners like TripAdvisor and Simplotel, but its smaller partner network limits flexibility. If extensive OTA and third-party app integration are key for your hotel, eviivo’s larger network makes it the better choice. Edge: eviivo.
DJUBO’s recent reviews reflect a high satisfaction level, with a 96% likelihood to recommend and a 4.75/5 overall rating from 18 reviews, many of which praise its ease of use and comprehensive features. Its ratings are more current, indicating an engaged user base.
eviivo, with 231 reviews, has a slightly higher likelihood to recommend at 97%, but its overall rating remains at 0/5, which suggests review data is less recent or less detailed. Given the volume of recent feedback, DJUBO’s higher rating and recent reviews make it the more trusted option currently. Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO’s pricing information isn’t publicly available, but reports suggest a tailored quote based on modules and property size, with no implementation fees or freemium options. Its value proposition revolves around modularity and scalability.
eviivo charges a $700 monthly base fee plus per-booking or per-property fees, with no free tier or trial. The higher upfront cost can be justified for smaller properties needing OTA connectivity, but DJUBO’s flexible pricing may appeal to larger or multi-service hotels. The real value depends on your hotel’s size and needs.
DJUBO provides a comprehensive, all-in-one platform suited for hotels that want to control every aspect of operations from reservations to back-office tasks. Its extensive feature set and recent positive reviews make it a solid choice for multi-property and full-service hotels.
eviivo excels in OTA connectivity, automation, and ease of use, making it ideal for smaller properties or operators with a portfolio of vacation rentals or B&Bs. Its wide integration network and recent user feedback highlight its effectiveness for distribution-focused hotels.
Choose DJUBO if you need a centralized management system that covers all aspects of hotel operations. Opt for eviivo if your goal is to maximize distribution, streamline bookings, and expand your online presence with minimal fuss.
Final recommendation: Given the larger volume of recent reviews and a higher overall rating, DJUBO stands out as the more reliable and versatile choice for hotels seeking a full management platform. However, if OTA distribution and automation are your priorities, eviivo’s extensive network makes it a compelling option for smaller or multi-property operators.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多评论都强调了Eviivo提供的卓越支持和新用户引导体验,尤其赞扬了客服人员在简化过渡和设置流程方面所发挥的作用。支持团队以其快速、清晰的帮助而著称,这对... 许多评论都强调了Eviivo提供的卓越支持和新用户引导体验,尤其赞扬了客服人员在简化过渡和设置流程方面所发挥的作用。支持团队以其快速、清晰的帮助而著称,这对于确保运营顺畅至关重要。
用户对Eviivo直观易用的平台赞不绝口,该平台简化了预订和渠道管理,即使是不懂技术的用户也能轻松上手。预订、渠道和设置方面的便捷导航显著减少了管理工作。
Eviivo的多种功能,例如多物业管理和集中运营控制,备受好评。用户表示这些功能节省了时间并优化了日常管理,但也有一些用户希望获得更多自定义选项。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然该平台在桌面端的使用体验备受好评,但一些评论批评其移动网站操作繁琐,应用程序缺乏直观性,导致用户在移动中管理预订时面临诸多挑战。
部分用户最初遇到了一些技术问题,例如显示错误,但他们表示这些问题在获得技术支持后很快就得到了解决。用户认为持续的技术改进将有利于整个平台的提升。
排名更高的方面
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Djubo (Instaconnekt) 和 eviivo Suite™ CM 共享许多核心 Channel Managers 功能,但各有独特的能力。Djubo (Instaconnekt) 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 eviivo Suite™ CM 提供 32 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Djubo (Instaconnekt) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Djubo (Instaconnekt):否。eviivo Suite™ CM:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Channel Managers 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。DJUBO 的 HT Score 为 0,eviivo 的为 85。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问