The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 支付处理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 9 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 27 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 12 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #3 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #3 17 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #3 15 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 25 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #1 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #3 51 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #3 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #2 1 条评价 |
Choosing between Elavon by Elavon and Zil Money for your hotel’s payment processing depends on your specific needs. Elavon offers extensive hospitality experience with end-to-end payment solutions, while Zil Money provides a versatile financial management platform with numerous features. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize specialized payment processing or broader financial operations.
Elavon, despite its long-standing presence, has zero recent reviews and a perfect score of 0 out of 5, indicating limited current customer feedback. Conversely, Zil Money, with 54 reviews and recent feedback, scores over 62 points on the HTTR scale, making it the more validated choice today. Which aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
Elavon claims to understand complex hotel payment systems, offering secure transactions and integration with existing systems. However, with zero reviews and no recent customer feedback, its current efficacy remains unverified.
Zil Money, by contrast, boasts 54 reviews with recent activity, a 4.5/5 ease of use rating, and an 8.57/5 NPS score, indicating high customer satisfaction. It also offers 15 unique features like Pay by Link, Recurring Payments, and Multi-Currency Settlements, which are absent in Elavon. The real-world feedback suggests that Zil Money’s platform is straightforward and trusted by many hotels. Do you need a proven, well-supported platform with multiple features?
If your hotel requires a comprehensive financial management platform that includes invoicing, expense tracking, and multi-entity support, Zil Money is your best option. Its user-friendly interface and broad feature set appeal to small and mid-sized hotels looking for versatility.
Elavon might be suitable if you’re seeking a traditional payment processor with a long hospitality track record, but the lack of recent reviews and detailed features suggests it may not meet your current needs. For hotels prioritizing ease of use, quick onboarding, and customer support, Zil Money's high ratings and recent reviews point to a more reliable choice.
Zil Money earns a 4.5/5 in ease of use, buoyed by positive reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward setup. Customers highlight that onboarding takes minimal time and staff adapt quickly, reducing operational disruptions.
Elavon’s score is 0/5, with no recent reviews or user feedback available. This absence suggests uncertainty about its current usability and support. Without verified user experiences, it’s difficult to assess how easily your team could adopt or navigate Elavon’s platform.
Edge: Zil Money.
Zil Money provides 15 features, including Pay by Link, Recurring Payments, Multi-Currency Settlements, Apple Pay, Google Pay, and Payment Splitting. These features support diverse payment needs and international transactions, adding flexibility.
Elavon’s offering is unquantified, with no unique features listed, implying its core focus is traditional payment processing without the added functionalities Zil Money offers. Given the feature breadth and recent positive reviews, Zil Money’s platform is better equipped for varied financial tasks.
Edge: Zil Money.
Zil Money’s customer support scores 4.5/5, with reviews citing responsive service and helpful onboarding. Users mention that support is prompt and assists with setup, enhancing confidence in ongoing use.
Elavon has a 0/5 rating with no recent reviews, making it impossible to verify its support quality today. The lack of recent feedback suggests that, if support is critical, Zil Money is the safer choice.
Edge: Zil Money.
Elavon integrates with three verified partners, including Book4Time, Oracle Hospitality, and Yanolja Cloud Solution, offering some connectivity within hospitality systems. However, this is limited compared to broader financial software.
Zil Money does not list verified partners but offers an API, enabling custom integrations with multiple accounting and financial tools. Its open approach may provide more flexibility if your hotel relies on diverse software systems.
Edge: Elavon (slightly), but Zil Money’s API offers greater potential.
Zil Money’s reviews are recent, averaging 4.5/5 in ease of use and customer support, with an NPS of 8.57/5 and 87% likelihood to recommend. Hotels across various segments, including boutique and limited-service, endorse its reliability.
Elavon’s score is zero, and no recent feedback exists, so current hotel ratings are unavailable. Based on recent reviews, Zil Money clearly has the edge in user satisfaction.
Edge: Zil Money.
Elavon does not specify pricing, indicating it might have custom quotes or higher-tier enterprise models. This lack of transparency can complicate budgeting.
Zil Money charges a $400 base fee, with no monthly or implementation fees, and offers a 15-day free trial. Its transparent pricing model and free trial make it accessible for hotels wanting clear costs upfront.
Elavon suits larger hotels or chains already integrated with its systems, but lack of recent reviews makes current suitability uncertain.
Zil Money is well-suited for boutique hotels, limited-service brands, and properties seeking to modernize their financial operations.
Elavon offers a long-established payment processing solution focused on security and stability, but the absence of recent reviews raises questions about current performance. Its strengths lie in traditional systems, large-scale enterprise support, and secure transactions.
Zil Money, with its recent reviews and 15 unique features, appeals to hotels seeking ease of use, diverse payment options, and comprehensive financial tools. It also boasts higher customer satisfaction ratings and a transparent pricing model.
If your hotel values proven, secure payment processing and already has systems in place, Elavon might still be worth considering—but its current lack of verified customer feedback weakens its position.
For hotels aiming for a user-friendly, feature-rich platform with strong positive reviews, Zil Money emerges as the clear choice. Its recent customer ratings and extensive feature set make it a more reliable partner for modern financial management.
Final recommendation: For most hotels active today, Zil Money offers the proven, well-reviewed, and feature-rich platform that aligns with your operational needs.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户经常称赞 Zil Money 的直观界面,简化了发票、费用跟踪和其他财务任务。该平台的易用性缩短了入门时间并提高了运营效率。
一些评论表明,客户体验的一些细微改进,例如简化验证流程和减少设置时间,可以使平台更加高效和用户友好。
许多用户强调了 Zil Money 支付处理功能的速度和可靠性,这确保了及时交易并支持酒店的现金流管理。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户看重Zil Money与各种会计和财务软件无缝集成的能力,这有助于整合财务运营并提高效率。
用户建议扩大与更多第三方应用程序的集成,这将提供更多的灵活性和定制性,满足不同的业务需求。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Elavon 和 Zil Money 共享许多核心 Payments Processing Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Elavon 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Zil Money 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Zil Money 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Elavon:否。Zil Money:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Payments Processing Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Elavon 的 HT Score 为 0,Zil Money 的为 63。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问