The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 34 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
RHG Hotels 表现出色 .
Shiji Group 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
基于 HTR 上 34 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $1,200/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 34 |
在分析了 34 条经验证的评价后,RHG Hotels 用户最看重其 ,而 Shiji Group 用户则强调 易于使用, 支持团队, 执行。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| RHG Hotels |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
+
支持团队
▾
|
|
|
+
执行
▾
|
|
|
+
培训材料
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
系统速度
▾
|
|
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | RHG Hotels |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | — | #53 2 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #31 17 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #11 13 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #22 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | RHG Hotels |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #33 17 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #24 25 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #22 19 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | — | #45 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | RHG Hotels |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #33 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #30 8 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #14 5 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #5 14 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) involves balancing functionality, ease of use, support, and cost. Both EMMA by RHG Hotels and Shiji Daylight PMS aim to streamline hotel operations, but their approaches and maturity levels differ significantly. EMMA remains a lesser-known solution with no recent reviews or ratings, while Shiji Daylight PMS benefits from a global presence, extensive feature set, and a strong user base. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and tech needs.
EMMA is positioned as an AI-driven feedback tool integrated into hotel operations, but it lacks recent customer feedback or proven scale. Conversely, Shiji Daylight PMS is a comprehensive, cloud-native platform with a proven track record, ongoing support, and a broad integration ecosystem. Which product aligns better with your current needs and growth plans?
EMMA by RHG Hotels appears to focus on customer feedback management, with AI tools designed to interpret reviews and suggest improvements. It’s intended to support hotels seeking insights into guest satisfaction, but it offers no recent, verified reviews or detailed feature set that directly impacts daily operations.
Shiji Daylight PMS, on the other hand, delivers a full suite of operations tools—guest profiles, booking, check-in/out, billing, housekeeping, and more—validated by 32 reviews and a 4.63/5 ease of use rating. Its comprehensive capabilities and recent feedback suggest it can handle large, complex properties or hotel groups efficiently.
If you’re searching for a feedback-focused platform, EMMA might seem appealing. But if your need is a reliable, scalable PMS that actively manages all guest and operational data, Shiji Daylight is clearly the more mature choice.
If your hotel needs a complete PMS for daily operations, central guest data, and automation, go with Shiji Daylight PMS. Its 98 features, including online check-in, guest messaging, integrated CRS, and automation tools, provide everything required to run a modern hotel smoothly.
If your team’s focus is on leveraging customer feedback to inform service improvements, EMMA could be relevant. However, without recent reviews or a strong track record, it’s less suitable for actively managing property operations or supporting a large staff.
For hotels looking to scale, improve operational efficiency, and maintain guest experiences across multiple properties, Shiji Daylight PMS is the clear choice. EMMA suits niche feedback initiatives but isn’t a standalone operational solution.
Shiji Daylight PMS scores 4.63/5 in ease of use, with positive reviews highlighting its intuitive interface, comprehensive training materials—including videos—and simple onboarding process. Users find it accessible even for staff with minimal technical experience, with many noting the platform’s straightforward navigation and quick learning curve.
EMMA, with no recent reviews or ratings, offers no data on usability or onboarding effectiveness. Its AI-driven feedback platform lacks the operational complexity of full PMS solutions, but this simplicity may not translate into a user-friendly enterprise tool.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
EMMA’s core strength lies in AI-powered customer review analysis and feedback management. Its features include sentiment aggregation and tailored recommendations, but it does not offer operational modules like reservations, billing, or housekeeping.
Shiji Daylight PMS boasts 98 features, including guest profiles, multi-lingual support, online check-in/out, integrated CRS, payment processing, group booking, automated night audit, real-time reporting, and extensive integration options. Its feature richness directly impacts daily hotel management, providing automation and data centralization.
Given the extensive feature set, Shiji Daylight PMS is the superior choice for comprehensive hotel management. Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
There are no recent reviews or ratings for EMMA, so support quality cannot be reliably assessed. This makes it hard to gauge how responsive or effective EMMA’s customer service might be in real-world scenarios.
Shiji Daylight PMS has a support rating of 4.53/5 based on 32 reviews, with many users praising its responsiveness and knowledgeable staff. Clients note that the support team plays a significant role in smooth implementation and daily operations, especially during initial onboarding.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
EMMA’s integration capabilities are unlisted, with no verified partner count, limiting its potential for complex hotel environments requiring multiple system integrations.
Shiji Daylight PMS offers 64 verified integrations, including prominent solutions like SiteMinder, Oaky, IDeaS, Amadeus, and more. Its extensive ecosystem ensures your hotel can connect revenue management, booking engines, distribution, and other operational systems with ease.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
No recent reviews or ratings exist for EMMA, so hotels have not expressed satisfaction or dissatisfaction with the product.
Shiji Daylight PMS holds a 74.69/100 HT Score and a 90% likelihood to recommend, reflecting strong satisfaction across diverse hotel segments. Hotels particularly appreciate its ease of use, support, and feature set, especially in larger or multi-property environments.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
EMMA’s pricing details are unavailable, suggesting it may be custom or not widely marketed. Its lack of transparent costs raises questions about suitability for hotels with tight budgets.
Shiji Daylight PMS costs $1,200 per month, with no mention of implementation fees or trial options. Its straightforward subscription model helps hotels plan operational budgets effectively.
In summary, Shiji Daylight PMS offers clear, predictable pricing, while EMMA’s costs remain uncertain.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference is that EMMA is a feedback-focused platform, while Shiji Daylight PMS provides an all-in-one operational system. EMMA’s niche is reputation management, suitable for small hotels or those prioritizing guest feedback insights, but it does not handle core hotel operations.
Shiji Daylight PMS, with its extensive feature set and global presence, is designed to support hotels that want to centralize management, automate workflows, and scale effectively. Its recent reviews and high satisfaction scores make it the more reliable, versatile choice for most hotels.
Choose EMMA if your primary goal is guest satisfaction analysis without needing a full PMS. Opt for Shiji Daylight PMS if you want a comprehensive, integrated solution that covers all operational aspects and supports growth.
In conclusion: For operational excellence, scalability, and a proven track record, Shiji Daylight PMS is the clear leader. EMMA by RHG Hotels may suit very specific feedback needs but falls short in overall hotel management capabilities, especially given the lack of recent, verified reviews and features.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| RHG Hotels |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,200/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,EMMA 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | RHG Hotels |
|
|---|---|---|
| 任务管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 集中用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 86 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户经常称赞石基 PMS 的用户界面友好,简化了日常操作,降低了新用户的学习难度。评论中强调了其易用性,指出其培训材料易懂、设计直观、任务执行高效。
石基PMS支持团队的支持和响应能力一直受到好评。用户赞赏支持人员的专业性和乐于助人的精神,这对更顺利地运营有很大帮助。
一些评论者认为石基 PMS 的实施过程流畅高效,他们赞赏知识渊博、积极主动的实施团队。不过,一些用户建议缩短实施时间以进一步改善体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管石基 PMS 的详细报告功能广受好评,但一些用户仍希望获得更先进、更快速的报告工具。具体要求包括增强的汇总报告、详细的账单和更快的报告生成流程。
与系统速度和一致性相关的性能问题是用户普遍关心的问题,一些用户指出在高峰操作期间响应时间很慢。用户敦促提高系统速度以提高整体效率。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。EMMA 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。EMMA 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Shiji Daylight PMS 提供 64 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Shiji Daylight PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
EMMA:否。Shiji Daylight PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。RHG Hotels 的 HT Score 为 0,Shiji Group 的为 75。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问