The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 243 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
eRevMax 表现出色 在 支持团队 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.7/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Multi-Currency Support.
HotelRunner 表现出色 在 ease of use and ROI 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Email Marketing and Data Analysis & Reporting.
基于 HTR 上 243 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 128 | 115 |
在分析了 243 条经验证的评价后,eRevMax 用户最看重其 支持团队, 运营效率, 利率平价,而 HotelRunner 用户则强调 多渠道管理, 支持与可靠性, 易用性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持团队
▾
|
+
多渠道管理
▾
|
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
+
支持与可靠性
▾
|
|
+
利率平价
▾
|
+
易用性
▾
|
|
+
分析和报告
▾
|
+
实时更新
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
技术问题
▾
|
−
界面改进
▾
|
|
−
分析和报告
▾
|
−
系统速度
▾
|
|
−
界面
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 渠道经理 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #17 21 条评价 | #12 40 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #8 59 条评价 | #13 22 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 35 条评价 | #10 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #10 5 条评价 | #15 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 52 条评价 | #7 51 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #7 55 条评价 | #10 31 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #7 35 条评价 | #14 17 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #8 18 条评价 | #12 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #9 17 条评价 | #19 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #9 40 条评价 | #14 16 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #10 14 条评价 | #13 8 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #3 42 条评价 | #2 63 条评价 |
Choosing between RateTiger Channel Manager by eRevMax and HotelRunner Channel Manager primarily hinges on your hotel’s priorities. Both products address the core need to synchronize rates and availability across multiple channels, reducing manual work and overbookings. However, they diverge significantly in user feedback, feature sets, and recent activity, which can impact your decision.
RateTiger has been a staple in the industry for years, backed by a large network of partners, but recent reviews show limited activity. HotelRunner, on the other hand, boasts more recent user feedback and a higher overall rating—making it the more current and trusted option. Are you ready to find out which fits your hotel best?
RateTiger is known for its extensive network of over 70 verified partners, including major OTAs like Expedia, Agoda, and Airbnb, alongside GDS integrations. Its reputation is built on reliable real-time synchronization and robust connectivity, especially for hotels already integrated into its broad partner ecosystem.
HotelRunner, however, offers a smaller but growing network of 17 verified partners, including notable integrations like Stripe and direct support for channels like Pitchup.com. Despite fewer partners, its recent reviews highlight ease of use, fast setup, and strong customer support, especially for smaller hotels or properties looking for simplicity.
Recent activity favors HotelRunner, with four reviews in the last six months versus none for RateTiger, which indicates ongoing development and user engagement. Do you prioritize established networks or a more current user experience? The choice depends on your hotel’s existing channel partnerships and future expansion plans.
If your hotel seeks a channel manager with a large global network, proven reliability, and extensive integrations, RateTiger is the clear choice. Its wide reach includes more than 400 partners, and its reputation for stability is backed by many long-term users.
Conversely, if you need a tool that is easier to implement, more intuitive, and supported by recent user reviews praising onboarding and support, HotelRunner is preferable. Its affordable entry point at $100/month and features like real-time updates and social media management make it a compelling option for small to mid-sized hotels.
For hotels that prioritize scalability and extensive channel reach, RateTiger’s experience and network are advantageous. For those valuing ease of use, quick setup, and responsive support, HotelRunner offers a more modern, user-friendly experience.
RateTiger’s user interface receives a 4.39/5 rating but is often described as somewhat outdated and slow, particularly in meta connectivity updates. Users report that the system can feel laggy and cumbersome, especially when managing large inventories or making frequent updates, which can hinder operational speed.
HotelRunner, with a 4.7/5 ease of use rating, is frequently praised for its intuitive platform and quick onboarding process. Recent reviews highlight the simplicity of managing multiple channels from a single dashboard, supported by a helpful onboarding team, often making the setup feel straightforward even for non-tech-savvy staff.
Edge: HotelRunner.
RateTiger offers core features such as rate and availability synchronization, multi-currency support, and booking confirmations, but lacks some advanced marketing tools. It has nine shared features with HotelRunner and one unique feature: multi-currency support.
HotelRunner surpasses RateTiger with 15 exclusive features, including email marketing, web design, social media management, channel self-mapping, and detailed reporting tools. These additional features support broader hotel management beyond channel distribution, offering more value for hotels seeking an all-in-one platform.
Edge: HotelRunner.
Both products are highly rated for support, with RateTiger at 4.61/5 and HotelRunner at 4.7/5. RateTiger’s reviews commend its quick response and dedicated support team, though some mention delays during high-volume periods.
HotelRunner’s more recent reviews emphasize its responsive support and helpful onboarding, with users noting the presence of dedicated support agents and swift problem resolution. The consistent recent positive feedback makes HotelRunner’s support slightly more reliable and aligned with current user expectations.
Edge: HotelRunner.
RateTiger offers a substantially larger network with 70 verified partners, including major OTAs, GDS, and meta search sites. Shared integrations include industry giants like Expedia, Agoda, Airbnb, and TripAdvisor, but RateTiger also supports niche or regional partners unavailable on HotelRunner.
HotelRunner’s 17 verified partners, while fewer, include key channels like Stripe and direct integrations with popular PMS systems such as protel. Its broader set of unique features may compensate for fewer integrations, but if extensive third-party connectivity is your priority, RateTiger clearly leads.
Edge: RateTiger.
Despite fewer recent reviews, RateTiger maintains a high overall score of 4.7/5 but has no reviews in the last six months, which weakens confidence in current performance. HotelRunner, with a 4.78/5 rating and four recent reviews, demonstrates ongoing active development and user satisfaction.
HotelRunner is favored across segments, especially by boutique and independent hotels, which appreciate its ease of use and support. Larger hotels or those with existing extensive channel networks tend to rate RateTiger higher due to its proven scalability and extensive integrations.
Edge: HotelRunner.
RateTiger’s pricing is not publicly disclosed, as it often customizes quotes based on hotel size and needs, which makes direct comparison difficult. Its implementation and ongoing costs are typically higher, reflecting its enterprise-level features and network.
HotelRunner charges a flat $100/month fee with no setup or implementation costs disclosed, making it accessible for small to mid-sized hotels. Its transparent pricing allows easier budgeting, though some features may require additional payments or upgrades.
Not ideal if you prefer a straightforward, less complex system or are a small property with limited online distribution needs.
Not ideal if you require a vast network of third-party integrations or complex revenue management features.
RateTiger is the choice for hotels looking for a dependable, well-established channel management system with extensive partner networks and complex features. Its robust infrastructure benefits large properties, chains, or hotels with existing integrations.
HotelRunner is better suited for hotels that want ease of use, quick setup, and active support, especially smaller properties or those venturing into online distribution. Its recent reviews, higher user ratings, and broader feature set for marketing and management make it the more contemporary choice.
In conclusion, if your hotel needs a tried-and-true platform with a vast network and proven stability, RateTiger is the better pick. For hotels prioritizing simplicity, recent activity, and integrated marketing tools, HotelRunner is the superior option.
渠道经理 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $100/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,RateTiger Channel Manager (by eRevMax) 和 HotelRunner Channel Manager 共享 9 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Web开发 | ||
| 元搜索营销 | ||
| 多币种支持 | ||
| 数据分析和报告 | ||
| 电子邮件营销 | ||
| 网页设计 | ||
| 转化率优化 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 4 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 2 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"With RateTiger, we have managed to take our occupancy to 90%. Their 2-way integration between our PMS and multiple global and regional OTAs has ensured that we sell on the proper c..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We are working with RateTiger for the last 2 years. When I saw the features and functionalities of RateTiger Channel Manager, I was really impressed. RateTiger Channel Manager help..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
尽管该产品的支持团队总体上收到了积极的反馈,但一些用户建议进行改进,以更快地解决问题并提供一致的可用性。
eRevMax 的预订引擎和渠道管理器之间的整合通过简化预订流程提高了运营效率。
在所有 OTA 上保持价格平价被认为是一项显著的好处,确保客人无论在哪个预订平台上都能看到一致的价格,从而提高信任度并可能提高入住率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
评论中提到了诸如同步问题和可用性更新失败等反复出现的技术问题,但用户承认支持人员能够迅速处理此类情况。
全面的报告和分析工具因提供有关预订趋势的宝贵见解而受到称赞,使酒店能够做出数据驱动的决策,以最大化收入并优化策略。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户称赞 HotelRunner 能够通过单一平台无缝管理多个预订渠道。这项功能在旺季尤为重要,它能减少工作量和人为错误,同时确保所有渠道的信息保持最新。
用户评价中经常强调快速便捷的支持服务和可靠的运行性能。当用户需要帮助时,能够迅速获得响应,确保运行顺畅,避免重大中断。
客户经常提及该系统的用户友好性,尤其赞赏其能够便捷地跨多个渠道控制和发送价格。这种易用性对于酒店员工处理日常运营而言是一项显著优势。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论指出,对界面进行一些小的改进可能会有所裨益。虽然该系统总体上符合预期,但优化界面可以进一步简化操作。
用户普遍批评的一点是更新速度。尽管目前运行流畅,但一些用户认为速度可以更快,以提高操作效率。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。RateTiger Channel Manager (by eRevMax) 和 HotelRunner Channel Manager 共享许多核心 Channel Managers 功能,但各有独特的能力。RateTiger Channel Manager (by eRevMax) 提供 70 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 HotelRunner Channel Manager 提供 17 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。HotelRunner Channel Manager 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
RateTiger Channel Manager (by eRevMax):否。HotelRunner Channel Manager:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Channel Managers 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。eRevMax 的 HT Score 为 67,HotelRunner 的为 76。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问