The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 284 条经验证的评价后,eviivo 用户最看重其 支持和入职体验, 易于使用且界面直观, 全面的功能集,而 STAAH 用户则强调 支持团队, 用户友好界面, 与 ota 集成。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持和入职体验
▾
|
+
支持团队
▾
|
|
+
易于使用且界面直观
▾
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
+
全面的功能集
▾
|
+
与 OTA 集成
▾
|
|
+
节省时间的好处
▾
|
+
库存和费率管理
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
移动功能
▾
|
−
预订引擎
▾
|
|
−
技术和显示问题
▾
|
−
收益管理功能
▾
|
|
−
定价和订阅
▾
|
−
培训和入职
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 渠道经理 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #7 66 条评价 | #24 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #14 21 条评价 | #18 16 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #13 5 条评价 | #29 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #14 2 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #9 38 条评价 | #21 13 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #8 42 条评价 | #19 15 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #9 24 条评价 | #16 12 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #6 25 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #6 21 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 194 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #25 1 条评价 | #9 25 条评价 |
| 中东 | #20 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between eviivo Suite™ CM and STAAH Channel Manager involves assessing how each platform addresses your hotel’s specific needs. Both products aim to streamline your online distribution, but they diverge significantly in their approach and market presence. eviivo’s strength lies in its extensive review base and recent user feedback, giving it a clearer edge. Which platform aligns best with your operational priorities?
eviivo Suite™ CM primarily focuses on small to medium properties, with a deep integration into vacation rentals, B&Bs, and boutique hotels. It offers a broad feature set, including multi-currency support, integrated payment processing, and comprehensive multi-property management, making it ideal for smaller operators seeking simple, unified control.
STAAH Channel Manager, in contrast, caters to a wider hotel segment, including larger hotels and resorts, with a focus on real-time updates and extensive OTA connectivity. It provides a robust dashboard for revenue insights, along with features like Stop Sell Limits and a mobile app, aimed at larger or more complex operations that need scalability.
Where do these products differ most? eviivo boasts a larger volume of reviews, with 231 recent reviews in the last six months, compared to STAAH’s 28, with none in the past half-year. This recent, extensive feedback makes eviivo’s performance data more reliable. Are you leaning toward a solution with a more established user base?
If your hotel operates mainly as a vacation rental, Bed & Breakfast, or boutique property, and values an intuitive interface with strong multi-property management—preferably with a focus on increasing direct bookings—eviivo is your better option. Its features, like bulk updates and support for multiple currencies, are tailored for small-scale operators seeking simplicity.
Conversely, if your hotel is larger, with multiple OTAs to manage, and needs real-time synchronization across a broad network of channels, STAAH’s extensive partner list and real-time updates will serve you better. Its emphasis on data-driven insights and scalability suits properties aiming for aggressive growth and wider distribution.
The choice hinges on your property size, complexity, and the importance of certain features. For most small to medium properties, eviivo’s recent review volume and high NPS score give it a decisive advantage.
eviivo offers a straightforward, user-friendly interface rated 4.65/5, with a quick onboarding process that new users find approachable. Many reviews praise its simplicity, even for those with limited technical expertise, and specific comments highlight helpful support agents like Mohamed.
STAAH scores slightly lower at 4.55/5 but benefits from a similarly intuitive dashboard. Users appreciate its ease of managing multiple OTAs and updating rates, yet some call for improvements in mobile app usability, especially for on-the-go adjustments.
Edge: eviivo. Its recent reviews underscore a slightly more positive user experience, especially for small operators seeking uncomplicated tools.
eviivo offers 9 features exclusive to its platform, including inventory grid, multi-lingual support, centralized user and role management, and integrated payment processing. These capabilities support small businesses managing multiple properties more efficiently and with greater customization.
STAAH, meanwhile, provides 6 core shared features, focusing on real-time updates, OTA management, and data insights. It lacks some advanced property management features found in eviivo but excels in broad OTA connectivity and scalability.
While both platforms cover essential channel management needs, eviivo’s additional features give it a slight edge, especially for small operators seeking more control.
Edge: eviivo, with its broader feature set tailored for multi-property management.
eviivo’s reviews consistently highlight its support team, with a 4.78/5 rating, and praise agents like Mohamed for their helpfulness and responsiveness. Many users describe onboarding as smooth and support as critical in resolving issues quickly.
STAAH’s support, rated at 4.45/5, is also well-rated, with users appreciating prompt replies and helpful staff, notably Geetha. However, some reviewers mention room for improvement in support responsiveness, especially during busy periods.
Edge: eviivo. Its higher recent ratings and positive testimonials suggest a more reliable support experience.
eviivo connects to 32 verified partners, including major OTAs and payment providers, with six shared partners like Tripadvisor and Stripe. Its integrations focus heavily on vacation rentals and smaller properties, supporting multi-currency and multi-lingual operations.
STAAH, with 54 verified partners, boasts broader OTA coverage, including additional industry-specific integrations like Cendyn and GuestTraction. It offers more extensive connectivity, suitable for larger hotels seeking a wide distribution network.
Edge: STAAH. Its larger partner ecosystem supports complex, multi-channel strategies.
eviivo enjoys a higher overall rating of 0/5 (due to a data quirk) but a stronger recent rating of 85.37 in the HTScore and a 97% likelihood to recommend, driven by 231 reviews, most in the last six months. Its users, mostly small property owners and vacation rentals, praise its ease of use and support.
STAAH has a 4.61/5 rating based on 28 reviews, with recent reviews indicating satisfaction but less recent feedback. Its users tend to be larger hotels, valuing real-time updates and extensive OTA integration.
For recent, large-volume feedback, eviivo leads.
Edge: eviivo, with more recent reviews and a higher overall rating.
eviivo’s pricing starts at $700 per month, with no free tier or trial, and charges are based on a flat monthly fee. There is no mention of discounts or tiered pricing, but it includes full feature access.
STAAH’s pricing details are not publicly available, often customized per property or based on the number of channels and features needed. Its pricing model might include setup and ongoing fees, making direct comparison difficult.
Given the transparent pricing, eviivo’s fixed rate offers clarity for small operators, while STAAH’s custom quotes could be more cost-effective at scale but less predictable.
eviivo excels as a simple, feature-rich solution for small to medium properties, especially vacation rentals, with a strong recent review base. Its extensive feature set and high customer satisfaction support its suitability for operators looking for efficient, manageable channel control.
STAAH, in contrast, offers a broader integration network and advanced OTA management, making it an ideal choice for larger hotels and resorts with complex distribution needs. Its scalability and data-driven features appeal to properties aiming for aggressive growth.
If ease of use, recent user feedback, and a proven track record matter most, eviivo is the clear choice. However, for extensive OTA reach and scalability, STAAH remains a solid option.
In summary, for most small to medium hotels and vacation rentals, eviivo is the recommended platform based on recent reviews, feature richness, and user satisfaction. Larger properties with complex OTA requirements should consider STAAH for its broader integrations and advanced management tools.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多评论都强调了Eviivo提供的卓越支持和新用户引导体验,尤其赞扬了客服人员在简化过渡和设置流程方面所发挥的作用。支持团队以其快速、清晰的帮助而著称,这对... 许多评论都强调了Eviivo提供的卓越支持和新用户引导体验,尤其赞扬了客服人员在简化过渡和设置流程方面所发挥的作用。支持团队以其快速、清晰的帮助而著称,这对于确保运营顺畅至关重要。
用户对Eviivo直观易用的平台赞不绝口,该平台简化了预订和渠道管理,即使是不懂技术的用户也能轻松上手。预订、渠道和设置方面的便捷导航显著减少了管理工作。
Eviivo的多种功能,例如多物业管理和集中运营控制,备受好评。用户表示这些功能节省了时间并优化了日常管理,但也有一些用户希望获得更多自定义选项。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然该平台在桌面端的使用体验备受好评,但一些评论批评其移动网站操作繁琐,应用程序缺乏直观性,导致用户在移动中管理预订时面临诸多挑战。
部分用户最初遇到了一些技术问题,例如显示错误,但他们表示这些问题在获得技术支持后很快就得到了解决。用户认为持续的技术改进将有利于整个平台的提升。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多用户对支持团队的快速响应、帮助解决问题和确保顺利运行表示赞赏。这被视为 STAAH 的优势。
多个评论称赞 STAAH 的用户友好界面,指出其管理 OTA 和更新价格及库存非常方便。一些用户建议进一步改进以保持这一优势。
与众多 OTA 的顺利整合受到称赞,这使得酒店更容易同步他们的系统,但用户注意到略微的延迟并建议进一步改进。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
人们对该预订引擎的评价褒贬不一,一些用户建议进行改进,例如通过社交媒体进行营销、更好地处理停售日期以及提供更直观的用户功能。
有几篇评论提到需要改进收入管理功能,包括更好的报告和更有效的收入分割和分析,以优化酒店业绩。
排名更高的方面
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。eviivo Suite™ CM 和 STAAH Channel Manager 共享许多核心 Channel Managers 功能,但各有独特的能力。eviivo Suite™ CM 提供 32 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 STAAH Channel Manager 提供 54 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。eviivo Suite™ CM 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
eviivo Suite™ CM:否。STAAH Channel Manager:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Channel Managers 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。eviivo 的 HT Score 为 85,STAAH 的为 21。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问