The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 216 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
eviivo 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 Vacation Rentals & Villas 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Native Email Marketing and Guest Feedback Management.
Jonas Hospitality 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 216 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $700/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 216 | 0 |
在分析了 216 条经验证的评价后,eviivo 用户最看重其 customer service, user friendly interface and ease of use, 沟通与融合,而 Jonas Hospitality 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Customer Service
▾
|
|
|
+
User Friendly Interface and Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
沟通与融合
▾
|
|
|
+
培训和文档
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
聊天支持限制
▾
|
|
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
|
|
−
群组管理和自动化
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #11 54 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #18 14 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #10 6 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #21 0 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #10 44 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #7 35 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #10 19 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #10 12 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #10 30 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 152 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #25 2 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #21 0 条评价 | — |
Choosing between eviivo Suite™ HMS by eviivo and Jonas Hospitality Unified Platform hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both aim to simplify operations, but eviivo excels in serving independent and small-scale accommodations with a strong UK presence, while Jonas targets a broader industry spectrum. Your decision should consider your property size, regional focus, and critical features.
eviivo boasts a significant lead in reviews, recent feedback, and overall satisfaction scores. With 191 reviews in the last six months and a 95% likelihood to recommend, it clearly has a more active and recent user base. Jonas, meanwhile, has no recent reviews or comparable review count and thus provides less current data for evaluation.
Both eviivo and Jonas offer solutions to streamline front desk operations, reservations, and guest management, but they diverge in specialization. eviivo’s platform emphasizes ease of integration with OTAs and features tailored for independent properties like B&Bs and vacation rentals, with 54 unique features. Jonas provides a unified platform that consolidates reservations, housekeeping, and revenue management, but with fewer detailed features listed.
While eviivo supports multi-currency, native email marketing, and detailed guest profiles, Jonas focuses on real-time data access and department communication. eviivo’s extensive feature set and regional presence make it well-suited for small to medium independent properties, especially in Europe and the UK, whereas Jonas’s broader industry scope is better for larger or multi-property groups seeking scalability.
Are you looking for a platform tailored to independent accommodations with a proven track record? Or do you need a scalable system that consolidates operations across multiple departments? The answer influences which platform is better aligned with your hotel.
If your hotel needs a proven, highly rated PMS with a focus on independent properties, eviivo is the clear choice. Its 22 recent reviews, high ratings for ease of use (4.48/5), customer support (4.57/5), and strong review scores (95% recommend) demonstrate its reliability and user satisfaction. It’s especially suited if you operate B&Bs, vacation rentals, or boutique hotels that benefit from integrated booking engines, channel management, and email marketing.
Jonas Hospitality, lacking recent reviews and with limited available data, appears less mature and tested in today’s market. It might be appealing if you desire a platform that offers extensive front desk, reservation, and departmental integration, but without current user feedback, its suitability remains uncertain. Based on recent data, eviivo’s more established presence makes it the more dependable choice for most hoteliers.
eviivo’s ease of use is strongly supported by a 4.48/5 rating and positive reviews highlighting its intuitive interface, straightforward booking management, and efficient onboarding process. Users frequently mention how well the platform integrates with OTAs and simplifies daily operations, with some praising its mobile app and task management features. Onboarding is rated 4.38/5, reflecting a smooth transition for staff.
Jonas Hospitality’s user experience data is unavailable, and no recent reviews provide insight into its UI or onboarding process. Without this information, it’s difficult to assess whether it offers similar user-friendly features. Based on the available data, edge: eviivo.
eviivo outstrips Jonas significantly, offering 54 unique features compared to none listed for Jonas. These include multi-currency support, native email marketing, website development, guest feedback management, revenue and rate shopping modules, automated night audits, guest messaging, online check-in/out, and detailed reporting. Many features are designed specifically for independent accommodations to maximize operational efficiency and guest experience.
Jonas’s platform seems centralized around core reservation and housekeeping functions but lacks detailed feature descriptions or extras. Its absence of specific features limits its appeal compared to eviivo’s comprehensive toolkit. The edge clearly goes to eviivo for feature depth and specialization.
eviivo’s customer support scores a 4.57/5, and reviews frequently praise its professionalism, responsiveness, and onboarding assistance. Users highlight effective communication, especially during training sessions, though some mention occasional challenges in chat support. Overall, support ratings and positive quotes reinforce user confidence.
Jonas Hospitality offers no recent reviews or detailed support ratings, making it impossible to evaluate its customer service quality. Given eviivo’s high, recent support ratings, edge: eviivo.
eviivo is verified to have 32 integrations, including key partners like Canary Technologies and TripAdvisor. It supports integrations with channel managers, booking engines, and guest feedback systems, providing a versatile ecosystem for independent hotels and vacation rentals.
Jonas has 28 partners, including SiteMinder and Shift4 Payments, but with fewer details on specific integrations. The shared partners suggest comparable connectivity, but eviivo’s broader list indicates a slight edge. Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s recent reviews (22 in last six months) are highly positive, with a 95% likelihood to recommend, and property types like Bed & Breakfasts and vacation rentals give it the highest ratings. Users in these segments report increased efficiency, better guest communication, and revenue growth, citing specific improvements like doubling bookings or automating operational tasks.
Jonas has no recent reviews or ratings, so there’s no current data to assess user satisfaction. Given the active, recent feedback, edge: eviivo.
eviivo charges a base price of $700 monthly, with no freemium or trial options listed. Pricing for Jonas is not publicly available, which could suggest a customized quote or enterprise-level pricing structure.
With transparent pricing, eviivo provides clarity for hotel operators. The lack of publicly available data for Jonas makes it hard to compare value directly, but the known cost of eviivo’s platform supports budget planning.
Not ideal if your property is part of a large chain or requires extensive customization beyond what eviivo offers. Also, not recommended if your hotel relies heavily on advanced revenue management features not explicitly listed.
Not ideal if your property requires detailed, specialized features or if you prefer a platform with extensive user reviews and recent customer feedback. Also, not suitable if you need a highly regionalized platform with localized support, as Jonas lacks recent review data.
eviivo’s platform is a well-established, feature-rich solution with a proven track record in independent and small hotels, especially in Europe and the UK. Its high review count, recent positive feedback, and extensive integrations make it a reliable choice for hoteliers seeking operational simplicity and growth.
Jonas offers a broad, integrated system suitable for larger or multi-property hotels looking for a unified platform. However, with no recent reviews or detailed feature insights, its current market confidence appears lower.
If your hotel needs a trusted, well-reviewed platform for independent accommodations, go with eviivo. Its recent strong ratings and active user base make it the more dependable option.
Choose Jonas if your hotel values a scalable, department-wide solution and has the capacity to evaluate its features further, but proceed cautiously until more recent user feedback becomes available.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,eviivo Suite™ HMS 和 Jonas Hospitality Unified Platform 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 团体预订引擎 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 网站开发 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 42 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Managing The Historic Berkeley Place is a unique challenge given its historic significance and diverse suite offerings. With eviivo, every aspect, from booking to guest communicati..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Users frequently commend Eviivo for its exceptional customer service, with advisors like Jilani, Gu7etif, and Sam noted for their professionalism and... Users frequently commend Eviivo for its exceptional customer service, with advisors like Jilani, Gu7etif, and Sam noted for their professionalism and responsiveness during support interactions. The support team's availability significantly aids users in troubleshooting and optimizing system use.
Eviivo's interface is consistently hailed as simple and intuitive, making it easy for newcomers to manage bookings, calendars, and hotel operations ef... Eviivo's interface is consistently hailed as simple and intuitive, making it easy for newcomers to manage bookings, calendars, and hotel operations effortlessly. This contributes to enhanced productivity by reducing the learning curve for users.
与短信和WhatsApp等通讯工具的集成是一项显著功能,许多用户都赞赏其简化客户互动的方式。这有助于提升客户体验的定制化和个性化程度。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管Eviivo的在线聊天支持服务总体上广受好评,但一些用户反映其存在一些不足,例如客服人员在线时间有限、服务质量参差不齐等。改进这些方面有助于提升整体客户... 尽管Eviivo的在线聊天支持服务总体上广受好评,但一些用户反映其存在一些不足,例如客服人员在线时间有限、服务质量参差不齐等。改进这些方面有助于提升整体客户服务体验。
Eviivo高效的预订管理功能备受赞誉,可帮助酒店跨渠道无缝管理客房供应和预订情况。这通过确保有效的入住率管理,提升了收益优化。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。eviivo Suite™ HMS 和 Jonas Hospitality Unified Platform 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。eviivo Suite™ HMS 提供 32 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Jonas Hospitality Unified Platform 提供 28 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。eviivo Suite™ HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
eviivo Suite™ HMS:否。Jonas Hospitality Unified Platform:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。eviivo 的 HT Score 为 88,Jonas Hospitality 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问