The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 239 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
eviivo 表现出色 在 customer service 方面 — 尤其适合 Vacation Rentals & Villas 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping module and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Visitor 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 GDPR Compliant and Point of Sale.
在分析了 239 条经验证的评价后,eviivo 用户最看重其 customer service, user friendly interface and ease of use, 沟通与融合,而 Visitor 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Customer Service
▾
|
|
|
+
User Friendly Interface and Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
沟通与融合
▾
|
|
|
+
培训和文档
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
聊天支持限制
▾
|
|
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
|
|
−
群组管理和自动化
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #11 54 条评价 | #37 3 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #18 14 条评价 | #30 3 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #10 6 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #21 0 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #10 44 条评价 | #42 0 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #7 35 条评价 | #33 2 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #10 19 条评价 | #28 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #10 12 条评价 | #22 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #10 30 条评价 | #31 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 152 条评价 | #10 23 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #25 2 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #21 0 条评价 | — |
Choosing between eviivo Suite™ HMS and Visitor hinges on your hotel’s size, operational needs, and growth plans. eviivo aims to serve independent accommodation providers with a comprehensive management system, while Visitor offers an all-in-one platform emphasizing simplicity and guest management. Both claim to streamline operations, but their strengths and customer feedback diverge significantly.
eviivo’s more established presence, broader feature set, and larger user base make it a more proven choice for many hoteliers. Visitor’s newer, streamlined design targets hotels prioritizing ease of use and digital automation. Which aligns better with your hotel’s current needs?
eviivo and Visitor both address the core hotel management challenge: simplifying daily operations and increasing revenue. eviivo’s extensive feature library and integration options cater to larger or more complex properties, while Visitor’s focus on simplicity and automation appeals to smaller, digitally-minded hotels.
eviivo boasts a 87.7 HTR Score, over 190 reviews, and a strong reputation among independent hotels, especially in Europe. Visitor, with only 22 reviews and no recent feedback, has a higher ease-of-use rating (4.91/5) and a support score of 5/5, but lacks the extensive integrations and feature depth of eviivo.
Do you need a proven, feature-rich platform with a track record, or a nimble, straightforward solution that simplifies guest management?
If your hotel manages multiple properties, needs advanced revenue management, or relies heavily on integrations with OTAs, eviivo is the clear choice. It’s suited for hotels, inns, and vacation rentals seeking robust report tools, automation, and extensive partner connections.
If your hotel is small, prioritizes ease of use, and wants quick setup with basic automation features, Visitor offers an appealing alternative. It’s ideal for independent inns or boutique hotels that want to simplify daily tasks without extensive customization.
For large-scale operations or those looking to expand, eviivo’s proven capabilities outweigh Visitor’s simplicity. Conversely, if you value a straightforward user experience and quick onboarding, Visitor could be sufficient.
eviivo scores 4.48/5 for ease of use, thanks to its well-designed interface and onboarding process. Users highlight its straightforward reservation management and integration setup, though some note the interface could benefit from further user-friendliness improvements.
Visitor edges with a 4.91/5 rating, with reviewers praising its intuitive, online-only platform and minimal learning curve. Users mention that setup and daily operation are quick and stress-free, with Marcel and Sean noted for their support during onboarding.
Edge: Visitor.
eviivo offers 27 features, including group booking, housekeeping, rate shopping, direct billing, guest communication, and real-time reporting—many of which are absent in Visitor. Its features are designed for complex operations, supporting automation, multi-property management, and revenue optimization.
Visitor provides only 2 features exclusive to it: GDPR compliance and Point of Sale. While these are valuable, the limited feature set means it lacks many operational tools eviivo offers.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s support scores 4.57/5, with reviews emphasizing its professionalism and responsiveness. Users appreciate the thorough training sessions and the dedicated support team, although some mention inconsistencies in chat support.
Visitor impresses with a perfect 5/5 rating, with reviewers describing its customer service as "friendly," "helpful," and "quick." While fewer reviews are recent, the overall sentiment favors Visitor’s high-touch assistance.
Edge: Visitor.
eviivo boasts 32 verified partners, including major OTAs like Booking.com, Expedia, TripAdvisor, and specialized partners like Experience Hotel and Hotelchamp. These integrations enable seamless multi-channel distribution and revenue management.
Visitor has no verified integrations listed, which limits its ability to connect with third-party tools or OTAs directly. This restricts scalability for properties looking to expand their online presence.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s reviews are more numerous and recent, with a 9.17/5 NPS score and 95% likelihood to recommend. Hotels across segments, especially B&Bs and vacation rentals, praise its reliability and operational support.
Visitor, with only 22 reviews and no recent feedback, cannot match eviivo’s rating confidence. The perfect scores from existing reviews suggest high satisfaction among early users but lack broad validation.
Edge: eviivo.
eviivo charges a $700 monthly flat fee, with no free trial or implementation fees. Its pricing reflects its extensive features and integrations, suitable for mid-sized or growing properties.
Visitor’s pricing is not publicly available, with no trial or flat fee information. Its lower complexity might suggest a more accessible price point, but without official figures, comparison is limited.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
eviivo provides a comprehensive management system with a proven track record, extensive features, and broad integration options. It’s best suited for properties that want to scale, automate, and optimize revenue across multiple channels.
Visitor is a more streamlined, user-friendly platform that excels in simplicity and support, ideal for small hotels or inns focused on guest experience without complex operational demands.
Choose eviivo if your hotel needs depth, integrations, and scalability. Opt for Visitor if ease of use, quick setup, and high customer service are your priorities.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Managing The Historic Berkeley Place is a unique challenge given its historic significance and diverse suite offerings. With eviivo, every aspect, from booking to guest communicati..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Users frequently commend Eviivo for its exceptional customer service, with advisors like Jilani, Gu7etif, and Sam noted for their professionalism and... Users frequently commend Eviivo for its exceptional customer service, with advisors like Jilani, Gu7etif, and Sam noted for their professionalism and responsiveness during support interactions. The support team's availability significantly aids users in troubleshooting and optimizing system use.
Eviivo's interface is consistently hailed as simple and intuitive, making it easy for newcomers to manage bookings, calendars, and hotel operations ef... Eviivo's interface is consistently hailed as simple and intuitive, making it easy for newcomers to manage bookings, calendars, and hotel operations effortlessly. This contributes to enhanced productivity by reducing the learning curve for users.
与短信和WhatsApp等通讯工具的集成是一项显著功能,许多用户都赞赏其简化客户互动的方式。这有助于提升客户体验的定制化和个性化程度。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管Eviivo的在线聊天支持服务总体上广受好评,但一些用户反映其存在一些不足,例如客服人员在线时间有限、服务质量参差不齐等。改进这些方面有助于提升整体客户... 尽管Eviivo的在线聊天支持服务总体上广受好评,但一些用户反映其存在一些不足,例如客服人员在线时间有限、服务质量参差不齐等。改进这些方面有助于提升整体客户服务体验。
Eviivo高效的预订管理功能备受赞誉,可帮助酒店跨渠道无缝管理客房供应和预订情况。这通过确保有效的入住率管理,提升了收益优化。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。eviivo Suite™ HMS 和 Visitor App 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。eviivo Suite™ HMS 提供 32 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Visitor App 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Visitor App 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
eviivo Suite™ HMS:否。Visitor App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。eviivo 的 HT Score 为 88,Visitor 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问