The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 213 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
eviivo 表现出色 在 响应式客户支持 方面 — 尤其适合 Vacation Rentals & Villas 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Ancillary revenue tracking.
Lodgical Solution 表现出色 在 ease of use 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text).
基于 HTR 上 213 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $700/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 208 | 5 |
在分析了 213 条经验证的评价后,eviivo 用户最看重其 响应式客户支持, 入职专业知识, 技术效率,而 Lodgical Solution 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
响应式客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
入职专业知识
▾
|
|
|
+
技术效率
▾
|
|
|
+
预订和预约效率
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
改进建议
▾
|
|
|
−
定制和功能开发
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #15 54 条评价 | #51 2 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #23 23 条评价 | #55 2 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #20 8 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #18 2 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #19 41 条评价 | #58 2 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #16 38 条评价 | #52 2 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #19 21 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #10 18 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #15 39 条评价 | #30 5 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #6 142 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #33 2 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #29 1 条评价 | — |
Your hotel needs a property management system that streamlines operations, enhances guest experience, and integrates well with other tools. Both eviivo Suite™ and Lodgical Solution aim to meet these needs, but they approach it differently—eviivo with a broad, globally recognized platform, and Lodgical with a simpler, hotelier-built system. Which one will better support your hotel's growth and daily management?
eviivo Suite™ and Lodgical Solution both help manage reservations, guest communications, and operations, but their core strengths diverge. eviivo’s wide array of features and international presence make it suitable for diverse property types, while Lodgical offers a streamlined experience focused on ease of use. How do these differences align with your hotel's specific needs?
Recent reviews heavily favor eviivo, with 191 reviews compared to Lodgical’s 5, and eviivo’s higher overall ratings and more recent feedback underscore its stronger standing. Do you prioritize a proven, widely adopted platform, or are you seeking a more niche, straightforward solution?
If your hotel operates multiple properties with complex distribution needs, eviivo’s extensive online booking integrations, revenue management, and over 28 shared features make it a clear choice. Its strong international presence and larger user base provide more proven stability and support, especially for vacation rentals and independent hotels.
For smaller hotels or resorts seeking a cost-effective, easy-to-implement PMS with a focus on core operations like reservations and guest management, Lodgical’s simpler interface and strong user satisfaction (especially in North America) make it appealing. If your team values straightforward setup and daily usability, Lodgical fits better.
eviivo scores 4.43/5 for ease of use, but recent reviews highlight occasional complexity, especially for new users managing multiple properties. Its onboarding process is generally praised, yet some find the interface less intuitive, citing room for UX improvements.
Lodgical outperforms slightly with a 4.8/5 usability score, and reviewers emphasize its intuitive design, simplified workflows, and friendly support. Its interface is often described as easy for staff and managers to navigate, even for those less tech-savvy. Edge: Lodgical Solution.
eviivo boasts 23 unique features not found in Lodgical, including revenue management, multi-currency support, a guest app, automated night audit, and GDPR compliance. Its integrations with major OTAs and built-in automation tools set it apart for larger or multi-property hotels.
Lodgical offers just one exclusive feature – mobile device notes and tasks (voice-to-text) – but it covers essential PMS functions with simplicity. It excels in straightforward reservation and guest management but lacks advanced features like automated night audits or revenue modules.
Edge: eviivo Suite™.
eviivo’s support ratings are strong at 4.42/5, with many reviews praising its responsive, helpful customer service. Customers often highlight its onboarding assistance and ongoing support, which helps hotels maximize platform benefits.
Lodgical’s support is similarly rated at 4.6/5, with reviews emphasizing friendly staff and effective communication, especially appreciated by long-term users. Its smaller customer base results in more personalized service, but eviivo’s extensive support network gives it a slight edge. Edge: eviivo Suite™.
eviivo integrates with 32 verified partners, including major booking engines, channel managers, and online travel agencies like Expedia, Booking.com, and TripAdvisor. This breadth allows for more scalable, multi-channel distribution, crucial for larger or expanding properties.
Lodgical connects with 20 verified partners, including key systems like RateBoard and RoomCloud, but it offers fewer third-party integrations overall. Its compatibility is more suited for properties with simpler tech stacks.
Edge: eviivo Suite™.
eviivo’s review score of 87.05 and a 95% likelihood to recommend reflect broad satisfaction, especially among independent hotels, B&Bs, and vacation rentals across Europe and North America. Recent reviews confirm that users value its automation and multi-channel capabilities.
Lodgical, with only 5 reviews and no recent data, has a limited but positive reputation among small hotels and resorts in North America. Given the volume and recency of eviivo’s feedback, it’s the clearer choice for most hoteliers.
Edge: eviivo Suite™.
eviivo charges a base fee of $700/month, with no free tier, monthly per-room charges, or implementation fees. Pricing aligns with its feature set and global support, making it a premium solution.
Lodgical does not publicly list pricing, but it is positioned as a more affordable, smaller-scale solution. Costs are likely lower, but so are the features and integrations, making it suitable for budget-conscious properties.
eviivo Suite™ is a comprehensive, internationally proven PMS with a broad feature set, robust OTA integrations, and a large user community. It’s suited for hotels looking for automation, multi-property management, and future scalability.
Lodgical Solution offers a simplified, user-friendly PMS ideal for small hotels that prioritize ease of use and direct support. Its limited features and integrations make it less suitable for larger or more complex operations.
Choose eviivo if your hotel values extensive features, global reach, and integration capabilities. Opt for Lodgical if you need a straightforward, affordable PMS that simplifies daily management without the bells and whistles.
For most hotels, especially those with growth ambitions or multiple properties, eviivo’s larger review base, recent positive feedback, and feature depth make it the stronger choice.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,eviivo Suite™ PMS 和 Lodgical Solution 共享 28 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 基于云 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 12 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而... Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而提升了整体用户体验。
该平台在入职流程中提供专业知识,帮助酒店无缝集成系统。该指导确保信息集成的一致性和PMS功能的最佳利用,从而提高物业管理效率。
Eviivo 因其高效的技术而备受认可,它使用户能够更快、更少地完成任务。这减少了停机时间并改善了运营工作流程,确保了酒店管理的流畅体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户建议进行改进,特别是扩展移动应用程序开发等功能以及更具体的日常使用技巧,以进一步优化业务运营并利用平台的功能。
虽然用户总体上感到满意,但仍要求提供更多定制选项,包括网络和移动应用程序增强功能,以进一步满足特定的运营需求并提供额外的价值。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。eviivo Suite™ PMS 和 Lodgical Solution 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。eviivo Suite™ PMS 提供 32 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Lodgical Solution 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Lodgical Solution 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
eviivo Suite™ PMS:否。Lodgical Solution:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。eviivo 的 HT Score 为 87,Lodgical Solution 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问