The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 375 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Lodgical Solution 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Native Email Marketing and Guest CRM.
Stayntouch 表现出色 在 ROI 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Ancillary revenue tracking.
基于 HTR 上 375 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 5 | 370 |
在分析了 375 条经验证的评价后,Lodgical Solution 用户最看重其 ,而 Stayntouch 用户则强调 用户友好界面, 整合与入职, 系统性能和可靠性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
|
+
整合与入职
▾
|
|
|
+
系统性能和可靠性
▾
|
|
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
客房管理和客房服务
▾
|
|
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #51 2 条评价 | #18 51 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #55 2 条评价 | #5 208 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #7 29 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 58 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #58 2 条评价 | #6 220 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #52 2 条评价 | #6 180 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 152 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #14 17 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #30 5 条评价 | #4 262 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #12 64 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #21 3 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can make or break your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest experience. Both Lodgical Solution by Lodgical Solution and Stayntouch aim to streamline your workflows, but they diverge significantly in their market presence, features, and user feedback. Lodgical Solution, with just 5 reviews, offers a solid but limited track record, while Stayntouch, with over 317 reviews and recent activity, provides extensive real-world validation. Which of these platforms truly meets your hotel’s needs?
Both products address core PMS functions like reservations, billing, and guest management, but their approaches differ. Lodgical Solution emphasizes affordability and simplicity, mostly serving small to mid-sized properties, whereas Stayntouch’s cloud-based system and broad integrations target a diverse range of hotel types and sizes. Are you prioritizing proven, extensive user feedback or a more focused, budget-friendly option?
Lodgical Solution is tailored primarily for small to mid-sized hotels, inns, and vacation rentals seeking a straightforward, cost-effective PMS. Its features include reservation handling, housekeeping, billing, and basic reporting, making it a reasonable choice for properties that need reliable core functions without complex needs.
Stayntouch caters to a broader spectrum, including boutique hotels, resorts, and larger chains, thanks to its extensive feature set and integrations. Its cloud-based architecture and mobile functionality support multi-property management and enhance staff responsiveness, which might be overkill for very small establishments but invaluable for growing or multi-site hotels.
The key divergence: Lodgical Solution’s reviews are scarce and dated, offering limited user validation, while Stayntouch’s recent reviews and high NPS score (9.35/10) underscore its market trust and ongoing relevance. Do you want a niche, proven product, or a scalable platform with a proven track record?
If your hotel is small, budget-conscious, and needs a straightforward PMS, Lodgical Solution’s simplicity and affordability make it a logical choice. Its features like native email marketing and guest CRM support basic guest engagement, making it suitable for properties with limited complex operations.
If you require a scalable, multi-property system with extensive integrations, real-time reporting, and mobile apps, Stayntouch is the better pick. Its more than 188 verified integrations and high customer ratings for ease of use and support make it ideal for hotels aiming to grow and modernize.
Lodgical’s limited recent reviews suggest less ongoing development and fewer recent user experiences to validate its efficacy. Conversely, Stayntouch’s active user base and consistent upgrades signal a product invested in continuous improvement. Which aligns more with your hotel's growth plans?
Lodgical Solution boasts a user rating of 4.8/5, with reviews praising its intuitive interface and ease of onboarding, particularly for small teams. Its simplicity means staff can quickly learn essential tasks, reducing training time and minimizing errors.
Stayntouch also earns a high ease-of-use rating at 4.7/5, bolstered by its mobile-friendly platform and well-designed screens. Many users highlight that onboarding is smooth, and staff adoption is fast, especially with comprehensive training support.
Edge: Lodgical Solution. While both are user-friendly, Lodgical’s dedicated focus on ease for small teams and minimal learning curve give it a slight edge here.
Lodgical Solution offers 5 features unique to its platform, like native email marketing, guest CRM, gift vouchers, automated reminders, and voice-to-text notes—features that enhance guest engagement and operational efficiency.
Stayntouch provides a more extensive suite with 25 unique features, including revenue management, mobile check-in, guest app, real-time reporting, shift planning, and multi-currency support. Its features are tailored for larger, more complex properties and multi-property management.
The total feature count heavily favors Stayntouch, making it the superior choice for hotels needing advanced capabilities. Edge: Stayntouch.
Lodgical Solution’s support rating is 4.6/5, with reviews emphasizing friendly, responsive staff and good onboarding—though the limited review pool makes these insights less comprehensive.
Stayntouch outperforms with a 4.68/5 support rating, often praised for thorough training, quick assistance, and proactive support. Reviewers frequently mention that the support team goes above and beyond, especially during onboarding and system upgrades.
Edge: Stayntouch. Its more extensive review activity and higher support ratings make it the more dependable choice for ongoing assistance.
Lodgical Solution integrates with 20 verified partners, including industry players like RoomCloud and Booking Expert, but its ecosystem is relatively small. It offers essential integrations but may lack some of the latest third-party connections.
Stayntouch boasts 188 verified partners, including major systems like RoomPriceGenie and STAAH. Its open API and extensive integrations facilitate diverse hotel tech stacks, enabling seamless operations across platforms.
Edge: Stayntouch. Its broad ecosystem and continual expansion of third-party connections make it the more versatile option.
Given the review count disparity, Stayntouch’s high recent ratings—4.56/5 overall, 9.35/10 NPS, and 94% likelihood to recommend—show it is highly valued by users across different hotel segments. Its recent reviews, especially from boutique and independent hotels, highlight ease of use, quick onboarding, and operational improvements.
Lodgical Solution’s reviews are sparse, with no recent feedback to validate ongoing support or feature development. Its older reviews don’t suggest a current active user base or ongoing improvements.
Edge: Stayntouch. The volume and recency of reviews strongly favor it as the more trusted and highly rated product.
Lodgical Solution does not publicly disclose pricing, which suggests a customized quote based on hotel size and needs. It’s likely more affordable, targeting small properties with straightforward requirements.
Stayntouch charges a base fee of $800 per month, with no additional implementation or per-room fees. Its pricing reflects its comprehensive feature set, suitable for mid-sized to large hotels.
Not ideal if your property requires advanced revenue management, extensive integrations, or multi-property oversight, given its limited feature scope and recent activity.
Not ideal if you operate a small inn or bed & breakfast with minimal tech needs, as the platform’s extensive capabilities may be more complex and costly than necessary.
Core difference: Lodgical Solution offers a straightforward, budget-friendly PMS primarily for small properties, while Stayntouch provides a robust, scalable system suited for larger, multi-property hotels needing extensive integrations and features.
When to choose Lodgical Solution: If you operate a small hotel, inn, or vacation rental seeking an easy, affordable solution, Lodgical’s simplicity and user-friendliness can serve your needs well. It’s ideal for properties that don’t require complex automation or advanced analytics.
When to choose Stayntouch: For hotels aiming for growth, multi-property management, or requiring comprehensive features like revenue management, guest apps, and real-time reporting, Stayntouch’s active support, extensive integrations, and high user ratings make it the clear winner.
Final verdict: Stayntouch’s superior review activity, recent performance, and expansive feature set position it as the more reliable choice for most hotels looking to scale and modernize. Lodgical Solution may be suitable for smaller, budget-conscious properties but lacks the ongoing validation and depth of Stayntouch’s ecosystem.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $800/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Lodgical Solution 和 Stayntouch 共享 24 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 18 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 5 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
该系统直观的设计便于操作,非常适合快速培训新员工。其醒目的视觉和组织元素有助于加快任务执行速度,提升员工能力,从而改善与顾客的互动体验。
Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设... Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设置方面。
Stayntouch 的服务总体可靠,很少出现重大故障,并通过云端提供持续支持。尽管总体评价良好,但一些用户也对公司快速发展背景下解决复杂问题的速度表示担忧。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然用户普遍称赞其易于访问且支持运营的报告,但他们也指出需要更具适应性的报告功能。一些报告缺乏细节或难以操作,凸显了可定制分析解决方案的必要性。
客房分配和客房服务功能因提升运营效率而获得积极反馈。然而,用户希望客房日志查看和任务安排功能能够得到改进,以满足特定的管理需求。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Lodgical Solution 和 Stayntouch 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Lodgical Solution 提供 20 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Stayntouch 提供 187 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Lodgical Solution 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Lodgical Solution:否。Stayntouch:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Lodgical Solution 的 HT Score 为 0,Stayntouch 的为 91。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问