The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Maxial |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #15 54 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #23 23 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #20 8 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #18 2 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Maxial |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #19 41 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #16 38 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #19 21 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #10 18 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Maxial |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #15 39 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #6 142 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #33 2 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #29 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between eviivo Suite™ PMS and Maxial hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational complexity, and growth ambitions. While both aim to streamline management, only eviivo offers a mature, widely-used platform with extensive integrations and high user satisfaction. Maxial, on the other hand, appears to be a less established system without recent reviews or documented user feedback.
If your focus is on a trusted, feature-rich PMS with proven results and ongoing support, eviivo stands out. Are you ready to see which product better aligns with your hotel’s goals?
eviivo Suite™ has been a staple in the property management market since 2004, boasting over 28,000 accommodations worldwide, with a current review count of 191 and recent feedback from 20 users in the last six months. Its ratings—overall at 0.93/5 and an impressive 87 on the HTR Score—reflect a well-established presence and positive user sentiment.
Maxial, by contrast, has no publicly available reviews or recent ratings, and its market footprint appears limited. With no recent customer feedback, it’s difficult to gauge its reliability or user satisfaction. Do you want a solution supported by a vibrant user community and proven track record?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, proven management platform with extensive integrations, eviivo is the clear choice. It's suitable for a wide range of property types, from vacation rentals to B&Bs, and offers modules like channel management, revenue tracking, online check-in, and guest communication—features that are well-documented and valued by users.
Maxial might appeal if you’re seeking a basic, less expensive system with limited integration needs, but the lack of reviews and features suggests it’s still untested in real-world hotel environments. If you want proven reliability and a track record of support, go with eviivo.
eviivo has a high ease-of-use rating of 4.43/5 and positive reviews praising its user-friendly interface, onboarding process, and mobile app. Customers frequently mention the intuitive design and reliable support, which help staff adopt the system quickly, with many highlighting the mobile app’s convenience.
Maxial, on the other hand, provides no user ratings, reviews, or detailed onboarding feedback. Its lack of documented user experience makes it impossible to confirm whether it’s easier to operate. Edge: eviivo.
eviivo offers over 51 features exclusive to its platform, including channel management, online booking engine, revenue management, guest CRM, automated messaging, and integrated payments. Its mobile app, task management, and real-time reporting are also highly valued by users.
Maxial has no documented features or modules listed, which raises questions about its capabilities and scope. Without concrete feature documentation or user feedback, eviivo’s expansive feature set clearly outperforms Maxial. Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s customer support is rated 4.42/5, with reviews emphasizing fast, helpful assistance during onboarding and ongoing use. Users frequently mention support staff as responsive and knowledgeable, which is crucial for smooth operations.
Maxial has no available support ratings or reviews, making it impossible to assess its customer service quality. Given the importance of reliable support, eviivo’s established reputation makes it the better choice. Edge: eviivo.
eviivo integrates with 32 verified partners, including major OTAs like Expedia, Booking.com, and TripAdvisor, as well as specialized providers like D-Edge and Canary Technologies. These integrations facilitate seamless distribution, payment processing, and guest communication.
Maxial offers no documented integrations or partner connections, limiting its potential connectivity. For a hotel that relies on multiple online channels, eviivo’s extensive integration network is a decisive advantage. Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s recent reviews show a high likelihood to recommend rating of 95%, with a strong emphasis on ease of use, support, and features. Although the overall rating is 0.93/5, the volume of reviews indicates active user engagement and evolving support.
Maxial has no recent reviews or ratings, so user sentiment cannot be reliably measured. Given the large, recent review base for eviivo, it holds a clear edge in perceived value. Edge: eviivo.
eviivo charges a base price of $700 per month, with no free tier or trial options listed. Its pricing includes a comprehensive suite of modules, making it suitable for hotels seeking an all-in-one solution.
Maxial offers no pricing details, leaving potential buyers uncertain about costs. Without transparent pricing or trial offers, eviivo’s clear and predictable fee structure provides better value clarity. Edge: eviivo.
Not ideal if your hotel has minimal online distribution or operates on a very tight budget with no need for advanced features.
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on OTA integrations, automation, or needs dedicated support.
eviivo is an established, feature-dense PMS with a proven track record of supporting diverse hotel operations worldwide. Its extensive integrations, high user satisfaction, and ongoing support make it suitable for hotels of all sizes aiming for growth and operational efficiency.
Maxial, lacking recent reviews, documented features, and integrations, appears to be an untested option. If you want a reliable, well-supported platform with proven results, eviivo is your best choice.
In summary, if your priority is a mature, comprehensive system backed by a large user base and active support, choose eviivo. For those seeking a simple, low-cost tool and willing to risk less support and fewer features, Maxial might suffice—but with caution.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而... Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而提升了整体用户体验。
该平台在入职流程中提供专业知识,帮助酒店无缝集成系统。该指导确保信息集成的一致性和PMS功能的最佳利用,从而提高物业管理效率。
Eviivo 因其高效的技术而备受认可,它使用户能够更快、更少地完成任务。这减少了停机时间并改善了运营工作流程,确保了酒店管理的流畅体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户建议进行改进,特别是扩展移动应用程序开发等功能以及更具体的日常使用技巧,以进一步优化业务运营并利用平台的功能。
虽然用户总体上感到满意,但仍要求提供更多定制选项,包括网络和移动应用程序增强功能,以进一步满足特定的运营需求并提供额外的价值。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。eviivo Suite™ PMS 和 Maxial 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。eviivo Suite™ PMS 提供 32 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Maxial 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。eviivo Suite™ PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
eviivo Suite™ PMS:否。Maxial:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。eviivo 的 HT Score 为 87,Maxial 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问