项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #15 34 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #11 64 条评价 | #38 2 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #22 5 条评价 | #42 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #8 6 条评价 | — |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 35 条评价 | #45 1 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #15 28 条评价 | #42 1 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #16 17 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #16 9 条评价 | #40 0 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #24 2 条评价 | #36 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #25 11 条评价 | #35 2 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #4 79 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #2 17 条评价 | — |
When choosing a booking engine for your hotel, your primary goal is to boost direct bookings while providing a smooth guest experience. Both Exely Booking Engine and Journey aim to serve that purpose, but they do so with different strengths—Exely offers a more feature-rich platform backed by recent reviews and a higher reviewer count, while Journey emphasizes a mobile-first design with streamlined features. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s specific needs?
Based on review volume, recent feedback, and overall ratings, Exely Booking Engine emerges as the stronger option. It has more recent reviews (63 in the last six months vs. 2 for Journey) and a higher score on customer support and ease of use, making it the more reliable choice for most hoteliers.
Both products are designed to foster direct bookings and improve guest engagement, but they approach these goals differently. Exely provides a broad suite of marketing and automation features, including email campaigns, booking abandonment recapture, and extensive integrations, making it suitable for hotels seeking a comprehensive solution. Journey, however, is built around simplicity and mobile optimization, focusing on a fast, intuitive booking process ideal for properties prioritizing mobile bookings.
Where they diverge is in their feature depth and regional presence. Exely supports more hotel types, including resorts and boutique hotels, and boasts a broader global reach, especially in emerging markets. Journey’s footprint is primarily in Europe and a few other regions, with a focus on ease of use and conversion. Do you need a feature-rich platform with advanced marketing tools, or a straightforward, mobile-first system?
If your hotel needs a platform with extensive marketing features, automation, and integrations to manage a diverse property portfolio, go with Exely. Its more comprehensive feature set and higher review count demonstrate reliability and ongoing development.
If your hotel prioritizes a simple, fast booking experience primarily for mobile guests, Journey is the better fit. Its streamlined interface and focus on conversions make it ideal for properties aiming to improve mobile bookings with minimal complexity.
For large hotel chains or resorts wanting advanced automation and detailed reporting, Exely offers clear advantages. Conversely, boutique hotels or independent properties that want an easy-to-manage, mobile-optimized booking engine should lean toward Journey.
Exely scores 4.91/5 for ease of use based on recent reviews, with users praising its intuitive dashboard and straightforward management tools. Support and onboarding are highly rated at 4.96/5, with users noting quick responses and proactive assistance. However, some wish for more customization options and improved analytics, indicating room for growth.
Journey, despite fewer reviews, scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use and support, benefiting from its simple, mobile-first design. Users report a smooth onboarding process and an interface that feels straightforward for staff and guests alike.
Edge: Exely
Exely offers 19 shared features plus 10 unique ones like room substitutions, booking abandonment recapture, and multiple payment options, giving it a broader toolkit. Its unique features support advanced marketing, flexible tariffs, and post-stay emails, catering to hotels with diverse operational needs.
Journey has 7 unique features, such as urgency messaging, Apple Pay, and A/B testing, focused on conversion and customer engagement. It’s optimized for rapid booking, real-time availability, and transparent pricing, which are critical for mobile-first audiences.
In terms of total features, Exely leads with 29, offering more customization and automation options.
Edge: Exely
Exely’s recent reviews highlight a support team rated 4.96/5, praised for quick responses, friendly communication, and helpful guidance. Clients mention the support’s proactive approach, which improves their experience and confidence in the platform.
Journey’s reviews, though limited, give a perfect 5/5 rating for support, with users appreciating its clarity, patience, and responsiveness. Support for Journey is perceived as efficient and attentive, especially for those with straightforward needs.
Edge: Exely
Exely supports 8 verified partners, including Hotellab, IDeaS, and Booking.com, with notable integrations like channel managers and booking platforms. Its broader integration landscape enables hotels to connect with more third-party systems, streamlining operations.
Journey supports 5 verified partners, including Stripe and SiteMinder, and offers integrations primarily focused on payment processing and channel management. While sufficient for many hotels, it offers fewer options than Exely.
Edge: Exely
Exely has a significantly larger review base (144 reviews) with recent feedback from 63 hoteliers in the last six months, giving it a more current and reliable rating. Its users, mostly in boutique, city center, and resort segments, rate it around 4.8/5 for overall satisfaction.
Journey, with only 2 reviews, lacks the volume and recency to establish a robust reputation. Its limited feedback makes it difficult to draw a definitive conclusion, but current reviews are positive.
Edge: Exely
Exely’s pricing starts at a flat $200 per month, with no freemium or implementation fees, offering a predictable cost structure suitable for hotels of various sizes.
Journey’s pricing details are not publicly disclosed, making direct comparison impossible. Its lack of transparent pricing suggests it may be tailored or tiered based on specific hotel needs.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Core Difference: Exely offers a comprehensive, feature-rich booking engine with automation, marketing tools, and broad integrations, while Journey emphasizes simplicity, speed, and a mobile-first approach designed primarily for direct conversion.
When to choose Exely: If your hotel needs advanced marketing automation, detailed analytics, and extensive third-party integrations, Exely provides a proven and well-supported platform. It’s ideal for hotels seeking to deepen their direct booking strategy and optimize their online presence.
When to pick Journey: If your priority is a straightforward, mobile-optimized booking process that encourages quick conversions with minimal fuss, Journey is the better option. It suits properties focusing on a seamless guest experience and faster booking cycles.
In conclusion, for most hotels looking for a proven, versatile platform with recent positive reviews, Exely Booking Engine is the recommended choice. Its richer feature set and larger user base make it more reliable for driving sustained direct booking growth. However, if your hotel’s strategy centers around mobile bookings and simplicity, Journey remains a competitive, niche option.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
商品和包装
|
|
|
| 房间替换 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 固定费率、浮动费率和折扣率 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 网站整合 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
|
▾
追加销售和交叉销售
|
|
|
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 替代住宿建议(没有空房时) | ||
| 忠诚度计划整合 | ||
|
▾
转换
|
|
|
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 价格对比 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| Facebook 转化跟踪 | ||
| 可定制的退出意图模式 | ||
| 表单自动填充 | ||
| 灵活日期 | ||
| 费率计划比较 | ||
| Google 酒店广告预订 | ||
| Tripadvisor 预订 | ||
|
▾
支付
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 苹果支付 | ||
| Google Pay | ||
| 贝宝 | ||
| PCI合规性 | ||
| PayU | ||
| 条纹 | ||
|
▾
通知
|
|
|
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 确认电子邮件 | ||
|
▾
团体预订
|
|
|
| 婚礼和企业预订模块 | ||
| 可用性块 | ||
|
▾
报告与分析
|
|
|
| 自动报告 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| 推荐报告 | ||
| Google Analytics 跟踪 | ||
|
▾
税务合规
|
|
|
| PCI合规性 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 |
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We took a proactive approach and collaborated with Exely, implementing various strategies, such as a loyalty program. The outcome has been outstanding — not only have we been able..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
评论者一致认为Exely界面直观、易于教学,且在预订、房态、价格和客人信息等日常酒店运营中高效。其简洁性被视为节省时间的工具,减少了手动工作,帮助员工更有... 评论者一致认为Exely界面直观、易于教学,且在预订、房态、价格和客人信息等日常酒店运营中高效。其简洁性被视为节省时间的工具,减少了手动工作,帮助员工更有信心地管理销售,尽管仍有部分用户希望在高级功能区有更清晰的导航。
支持是Exely最一贯受到赞扬的优势之一,评论者强调通过聊天、电话、Telegram和电子邮件的快速响应。用户欣赏在设置、费率变更、技术问题和特别优惠配置方面的实... 支持是Exely最一贯受到赞扬的优势之一,评论者强调通过聊天、电话、Telegram和电子邮件的快速响应。用户欣赏在设置、费率变更、技术问题和特别优惠配置方面的实操帮助,常说团队减少了运营摩擦并增强了使用系统的信心。
评论者反复表示,Exely 有助于将需求转移到酒店网站,增加直接预订并降低OTA佣金成本。许多人指出收入的可衡量增长、转化率的提升以及通过预订引擎和促销工具对... 评论者反复表示,Exely 有助于将需求转移到酒店网站,增加直接预订并降低OTA佣金成本。许多人指出收入的可衡量增长、转化率的提升以及通过预订引擎和促销工具对直接销售策略的更好控制。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
用户经常要求在预订引擎和网站方面拥有更多的灵活性,包括品牌颜色、模板、小部件设计、确认邮件和发票格式。一些用户还希望拥有更可定制的报告和仪表盘,指出当... 用户经常要求在预订引擎和网站方面拥有更多的灵活性,包括品牌颜色、模板、小部件设计、确认邮件和发票格式。一些用户还希望拥有更可定制的报告和仪表盘,指出当酒店希望提供更具特色的品牌体验时,Exely可能会显得有限制。
一个主要的持续存在的差距是对更高级别的报告和分析的需求。审查者希望对转化、收入来源、销售渠道、入住率、活动表现和预订趋势有更深入的了解,常常要求定制化... 一个主要的持续存在的差距是对更高级别的报告和分析的需求。审查者希望对转化、收入来源、销售渠道、入住率、活动表现和预订趋势有更深入的了解,常常要求定制化的仪表盘、移动分析以及更便于跨时期比较。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Exely Booking Engine 和 Journey - Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Exely Booking Engine 提供 8 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Journey - Booking Engine 提供 7 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Journey - Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.9/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Exely Booking Engine:否。Journey - Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Exely 的 HT Score 为 96,Journey 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐