The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #22 11 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #15 36 条评价 | #38 2 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #7 26 条评价 | #42 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #9 6 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #17 32 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #12 41 条评价 | #42 1 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #10 34 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #14 11 条评价 | #40 0 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #7 39 条评价 | #36 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #19 14 条评价 | #35 2 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #16 10 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 8 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Amadeus’s iHotelier® Booking Engine and Journey’s Booking Engine hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs, target market, and growth ambitions. Both platforms aim to boost direct bookings, but they approach this goal differently: Amadeus offers a more feature-rich, globally integrated solution, while Journey emphasizes simplicity and mobile-first design. Your decision should align with your hotel’s scale, technical capacity, and customer engagement strategy.
Amadeus’s platform benefits from a larger review base and more recent feedback, giving you a clearer picture of its ongoing performance. Journey, while praised for ease of use, has only a few reviews—making its track record less certain. Are you ready to prioritize a proven, comprehensive system or a lighter, user-friendly alternative?
Amadeus’s iHotelier is designed to serve a broad range of hotel types, especially larger properties and brands with complex needs. It offers extensive integrations, advanced marketing features, and a global presence, making it suitable for hotels seeking depth in functionality and market intelligence.
Journey is built around a mobile-first experience, emphasizing fast, straightforward booking processes. Its simplicity and high usability ratings appeal to smaller hotels or those prioritizing ease of implementation and quick deployment.
Both platforms aim to increase direct bookings but diverge sharply in approach: Amadeus provides a feature-dense environment for strategic revenue growth, while Journey offers a streamlined, guest-centric booking flow. Which aligns best with your hotel’s priorities—robustness or simplicity?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, highly integrated booking engine with advanced marketing tools, go with Amadeus. Its extensive feature set—including pre- and post-stay emails, loyalty integrations, and multiple channels—supports sophisticated revenue strategies, especially for larger or more technically equipped properties.
If your hotel prefers an intuitive, fast platform focused on converting casual browsers into direct bookers, Journey is the better choice. Its ease of use, mobile-first design, and high customer support ratings suit smaller hotels or properties aiming for quick, uncomplicated implementation without extensive feature demands.
For hotels seeking deep integrations, market intelligence, and multi-channel management, Amadeus is the clear winner. Smaller or mid-sized properties prioritizing simplicity and guest experience should lean toward Journey.
Amadeus boasts a solid usability rating of 4.25 out of 5, with many users noting that its complexity can initially be overwhelming but becomes manageable with training. Its onboarding process scores an above-average 4.01, yet some reviews mention the platform’s steep learning curve and the need for ongoing support.
Journey, on the other hand, receives a perfect 5 out of 5 for ease of use, with reviews emphasizing its straightforward design and quick onboarding. Users report that staff adoption is smooth, with minimal training required, thanks to its intuitive interface.
Edge: Journey.
Amadeus offers a total of 36 features, including advanced options like loyalty program integration, booking abandonment recapture, and Tripadvisor bookings—features not available in Journey. Its unique offerings make it suitable for hotels demanding in-depth marketing, analytics, and multi-channel management.
Journey provides only 6 features, focusing on core booking functionalities like real-time availability, transparent pricing, and social media integration, including Facebook conversion tracking. While limited, these features align with its goal of simplicity and fast conversions.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s support receives mixed reviews, with an average rating of 3.22 out of 5. Customers cite responsiveness issues, longer resolution times, and inconsistent assistance, which can hamper implementation and day-to-day operations.
Journey’s customer support scores a perfect 5 out of 5, with reviews highlighting its quick response times, clear communication, and proactive guidance. Clients appreciate the team’s patience and willingness to adapt based on feedback.
Edge: Journey.
Amadeus boasts 104 verified partners, including prominent integrations with SiteMinder, Oracle Hospitality, and many others. Its extensive network supports complex workflows, distribution channels, and marketing tools, making it ideal for hotels with diverse tech stacks.
Journey has only 5 verified partners, with common integrations like Stripe and Access Hospitality. While sufficient for basic needs, its limited ecosystem may restrict future expansion or advanced integrations.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus’s overall rating of 4.39 out of 5 is supported by 93 reviews, mostly from independent, boutique, and branded hotels across multiple regions. Hotels in these segments appreciate its market intelligence and integrated marketing features.
Journey, with only 2 recent reviews, has not accumulated enough data to reliably gauge hotel satisfaction. Its high ease of use and support scores suggest positive sentiment among early adopters but lack broad validation.
Edge: Amadeus.
Both platforms do not publicly disclose pricing models. Amadeus is typically offered via custom quotes based on hotel size and needs, with no free tier or freemium options. Journey’s pricing is similarly bespoke, without any trial or transparent fee structure.
Your best approach is to request quotes directly from both vendors to compare total costs and included features.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, or you prefer minimal setup complexity.
Not ideal if you need advanced marketing features, deep integrations, or complex analytics.
Amadeus offers a feature-dense, globally integrated booking engine that supports large, complex operations. Its extensive partner network and advanced marketing tools make it ideal for hotels seeking growth, detailed analytics, and multi-channel distribution.
Journey provides a simple, mobile-first booking platform focused on conversions and ease of use. Its intuitive design and strong support are perfect for smaller hotels or properties that want a quick, cost-effective upgrade to their booking process.
Choose Amadeus if your hotel requires depth, customization, and advanced integrations. Opt for Journey if your priority is simplicity, rapid deployment, and guest-friendly design. Both can boost direct bookings, but your choice depends on your hotel’s scale and strategic focus.
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 Journey - Booking Engine 共享 23 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Facebook 转化跟踪 | ||
| 价格对比 | ||
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 忠诚度计划整合 | ||
| 条纹 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 4 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
TravelClick 因其易用性而受到酒店员工和最终用户的一致好评。其预订引擎被描述为直观的,有助于顺利处理预订和价格管理。这种用户友好性是一个关键的卖点。
许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等... 许多酒店经营者称赞 TravelClick 能够通过先进的定价引擎、促销工具以及与各种渠道的更好整合来增加收入。他们提到了多费率显示、限时抢购和新的 Web 4.0 平台等功能,这些功能显著提高了直接预订量和总体收入。
人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素... 人们对客户服务的看法褒贬不一。虽然一些用户称赞客户服务周到且乐于助人,但也有很多人抱怨响应速度慢、解决问题困难。这种不一致是潜在买家需要考虑的重要因素。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
TravelClick 与各种系统(包括 PMS 和支付网关)的强大集成受到高度赞赏。许多评论都强调无缝连接支持各种功能,并通过统一界面简化管理。
尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验... 尽管该系统具有诸多优势,但一些用户仍表示其可用性存在挑战,他们指出界面复杂,某些功能的学习难度较大。这种复杂性可能会妨碍系统的最佳使用,尤其是对于经验不足的用户而言。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 和 Journey - Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine 提供 104 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Journey - Booking Engine 提供 5 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Journey - Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.3/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Amadeus – iHotelier® Booking Engine:否。Journey - Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Amadeus 的 HT Score 为 72,Journey 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问