项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
在分析了 302 条经验证的评价后,Exely 用户最看重其 用户友好的界面和日常操作的便利性, exely团队的支持与响应能力, 渠道管理与实时ota同步,而 innRoad 用户则强调 24/7客户支持, 用户界面, 定制和灵活性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好的界面和日常操作的便利性
▾
|
+
24/7客户支持
▾
|
|
+
Exely团队的支持与响应能力
▾
|
+
用户界面
▾
|
|
+
渠道管理与实时OTA同步
▾
|
+
定制和灵活性
▾
|
|
+
增加直订和网站收入
▾
|
+
报告功能
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告与分析差距
▾
|
−
性能问题和错误
▾
|
|
−
与PMS及其他第三方系统的集成
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 渠道经理 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #15 26 条评价 | #9 51 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #9 51 条评价 | #20 12 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #14 5 条评价 | #16 4 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #7 5 条评价 | #19 0 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 29 条评价 | #11 35 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #13 27 条评价 | #20 11 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #15 14 条评价 | #17 8 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #14 6 条评价 | #11 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #18 2 条评价 | #4 83 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #19 10 条评价 | #24 5 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #5 67 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 13 条评价 | #22 0 条评价 |
Choosing between Exely Channel Manager and innRoad Channel Manager hinges on your hotel’s specific needs for online distribution and management. Both products aim to streamline your bookings, reduce manual work, and boost revenue, but they approach these goals differently. Exely focuses primarily on efficient channel management with a user-friendly interface, while innRoad offers a broader suite of features including property management and extensive integrations. Which of these solutions aligns better with your operational priorities?
Exely’s rapid, real-time synchronization and high user satisfaction make it a compelling option for hotels seeking to optimize distribution. innRoad’s extensive feature set and global presence appeal to hotels needing a more comprehensive management platform. Are you ready to dive deeper into their strengths and weaknesses?
Exely excels at simplifying online distribution with its intuitive, easy-to-use interface and strong customer support. It's designed to optimize revenue for independent and chain hotels by automating rate updates and availability across platforms, reducing errors, and saving time—especially if your hotel operates primarily in North America, Europe, or Asia Pacific.
innRoad, on the other hand, offers a more extensive set of tools, including property management, guest communication, and integrated payment processing, making it suitable for hotels that need an all-in-one solution. It has a proven track record of increasing bookings and operational efficiency, especially for small to medium properties like motels and B&Bs. Which solution aligns best with your hotel’s growth stage and operational complexity?
Exely earns a near-perfect score of 4.95/5 for ease of use, thanks to its clean, straightforward interface and quick onboarding process rated at 4.86/5. Users frequently mention how intuitive the platform is for managing multiple OTAs from one dashboard, significantly reducing learning curves.
innRoad’s usability is also highly rated at 4.53/5, with praise for its comprehensive yet accessible interface. However, some users report occasional bugs and performance issues, which can slow down daily tasks. Overall, Exely’s superior ratings and recent reviews suggest it offers a slightly smoother experience. Edge: Exely.
innRoad outpaces Exely with 38 unique features compared to Exely’s 2 exclusive ones, including property management, guest communication, booking engine, group booking, and advanced pricing tools. These additional features enable hotels to manage more aspects of their operations within a single system, from bookings to housekeeping and marketing.
Exely’s special features are limited but include multi-lingual and multi-currency support—useful for hotels catering to international guests—but lack the depth of innRoad’s broader suite. If you need a versatile platform that covers multiple operational areas, innRoad has the edge. If your focus is solely on channel management, Exely’s simplicity might suffice. Edge: innRoad.
Exely’s support scores are outstanding at 4.95/5, with reviews praising quick, helpful responses and proactive platform updates. Clients describe their support as “responsive and professional,” making onboarding and troubleshooting hassle-free.
innRoad’s support is also highly rated at 4.64/5, with reviews highlighting 24/7 availability and thorough training. Users appreciate the dedicated onboarding assistance and ongoing help, but some report minor delays during peak times. Overall, Exely’s slightly higher recent ratings give it the edge. Edge: Exely.
innRoad boasts an extensive network of over 34 verified integrations, including major OTAs like Google, Airbnb, and Vrbo, plus property management and payment systems. This broad connectivity allows hotels to customize their tech stack and optimize operations across multiple platforms.
Exely, with 8 verified partners, covers key channels and tools but is less extensive. If comprehensive integration is critical for your hotel’s tech ecosystem, innRoad’s larger partner network offers greater flexibility. Edge: innRoad.
Exely’s reviews show a 0/5 overall rating from 94 reviews, indicating very limited user feedback or possibly a data anomaly; however, recent reviews are positive about its channel management efficiency. innRoad, with 62 reviews and a 4.88/5 rating, receives consistently high praise across small hotels, B&Bs, and motels for boosting revenue and simplifying operations.
For property type-specific feedback, small properties and boutique hotels prefer innRoad’s versatility, while larger hotels seeking straightforward distribution lean toward Exely. Given more recent reviews and higher overall ratings, innRoad has the edge here. Edge: innRoad.
Exely charges a straightforward $100 monthly fee with no freemium or trial options, making budgeting predictable. The absence of implementation fees simplifies the decision for hotels with limited onboarding budgets.
innRoad’s pricing is not publicly disclosed, which can make direct comparison difficult. It offers a comprehensive solution with custom quotes based on property size and needs, often including setup and ongoing support. This flexibility can justify higher investments for hotels needing a full management suite. Overall, Exely’s transparent pricing makes it easier for decision-makers. Edge: Exely.
Hotels that should consider Exely:
Not ideal if:
Hotels suited for innRoad:
Not ideal if:
Exely’s core strength lies in its user-friendly, real-time channel management aimed at increasing online bookings and reducing overbooking issues. It’s particularly suited for hotels that want an easy, reliable way to manage distribution without extra features cluttering their workflow.
innRoad, with its extensive feature set and broad integrations, is better for hotels that want a comprehensive management platform. It’s ideal if your hotel needs property management, guest communication, and revenue tools bundled together.
If your primary goal is optimizing online distribution with minimal fuss, go with Exely. If your hotel requires a full operational suite and extensive integrations, innRoad is the clear choice.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
费率管理
|
|
|
| 支持每周和每月费率 | ||
| 收益规则 | ||
| 派生费率 | ||
| 库存管理 | ||
| 库存网格 | ||
|
▾
房间类型映射
|
|
|
| 通道自映射 | ||
|
▾
自动化与同步
|
|
|
| 批量更新和多重限制 | ||
| 2路实时集成 | ||
| PMS 连接性 | ||
|
▾
管理和设置
|
|
|
| 多种语言 | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多币种支持 | ||
| 库存网格 | ||
| 综合支付处理 | ||
|
▾
分析和报告
|
|
|
| 分析仪表板 | ||
| 预订绩效和进度报告 | ||
|
▾
Other
|
|
|
| 无限频道(无需额外费用) |
我们分析了 6 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Before Exely, we could not get enough flexibility or functionality we needed. We couldn’t manage dynamic pricing or promotions properly, now the system provides us all the tools t..."
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
评测者经常描述 Exely 直观、易于使用、适合日常酒店工作。他们表示该系统简化了预订管理、价格更新和分销任务,帮助团队以更少的培训和错误更快地工作。
大量评价赞扬Exely支持团队提供快速、专业、以解决方案为导向的帮助。酒店重视在安装和日常运营中的快速响应,许多评价表示团队的主动指导减少了摩擦,帮助他们... 大量评价赞扬Exely支持团队提供快速、专业、以解决方案为导向的帮助。酒店重视在安装和日常运营中的快速响应,许多评价表示团队的主动指导减少了摩擦,帮助他们更高效地使用平台。
用户通常表示Exely能够在多个OTA之间实现价格、房态和库存的实时同步,从而减少超售和手动更新。酒店重视能够从一个平台管理多个渠道,并保持分销的一致性。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
报告是最常见的改进需求之一。评审希望获得更详细、可定制且更快的报告,能够更好地了解收入、渠道表现、预订趋势和客人行为,以支持更有效的收入管理决策。
许多用户希望与PMS平台、OTA、支付网关及其他酒店系统的集成更加强大。虽然一些用户称赞现有的连接,但也有人反映缺少PMS接口或集成问题,导致手动操作、重复预... 许多用户希望与PMS平台、OTA、支付网关及其他酒店系统的集成更加强大。虽然一些用户称赞现有的连接,但也有人反映缺少PMS接口或集成问题,导致手动操作、重复预订或工作流程灵活性受限。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
全天候客户支持因其可用性和响应性而受到称赞。用户强调技术团队的支持性和知识渊博性,这对于及时解决技术问题至关重要。
用户界面通常被描述为用户友好且直观,便于培训新员工。但是,一些用户认为某些区域(如团体预订模块)可以从更现代、更精简的设计中受益。
用户看重软件的自定义选项,尤其是面向客人的外观和计费功能。但是,在更直观的界面和额外的自定义功能方面仍有改进空间。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
一些用户报告了偶尔出现的错误和性能问题,例如系统冻结和加载时间缓慢。这些故障虽然通常可以控制,但可能会扰乱操作并影响用户满意度。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Exely Channel Manager 和 innRoad Channel Manager 共享许多核心 Channel Managers 功能,但各有独特的能力。Exely Channel Manager 提供 9 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 innRoad Channel Manager 提供 34 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Exely Channel Manager 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Exely Channel Manager:否。innRoad Channel Manager:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Channel Managers 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Exely 的 HT Score 为 91,innRoad 的为 20。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐