The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 821 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Yanolja Cloud Solution 表现出色 在 ROI 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (3.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 On premise.
Lodgical Solution 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) and Native Email Marketing.
基于 HTR 上 821 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $100/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 816 | 5 |
在分析了 821 条经验证的评价后,Yanolja Cloud Solution 用户最看重其 易于使用且界面友好, 可靠性和效率提升, integration and real-time synchronization,而 Lodgical Solution 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用且界面友好
▾
|
|
|
+
可靠性和效率提升
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration and real-time synchronization
▾
|
|
|
+
POS系统性能
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析功能增强
▾
|
|
|
−
高级功能请求
▾
|
|
|
−
移动应用性能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #2 492 条评价 | #51 2 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #6 174 条评价 | #55 2 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #10 14 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #37 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #3 264 条评价 | #58 2 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #2 416 条评价 | #52 2 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #5 131 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #5 41 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #16 45 条评价 | #30 5 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #26 16 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #1 635 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #3 15 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Yanolja Property Management System and Lodgical Solution hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both aim to streamline operations, but Yanolja offers a broader feature set and more recent reviews, making it the more tested and trusted option today. Lodgical, while feature-rich, has only five reviews and no recent feedback, limiting confidence in its ongoing performance. Are you prioritizing proven software with extensive integrations and a global presence?
Yanolja Property Management System emerges as the clear leader, boasting a 91.85/100 HTScore and over 660 reviews—most recent reviews are from within the last six months. Its high overall rating of 4.25/5 and 96% likelihood to recommend make it a trusted choice. Lodgical Solution, with only five reviews and no recent feedback, doesn’t have enough data to challenge Yanolja’s dominance. For a hotel seeking a tested, high-rated platform, Yanolja is the safer pick.
Yanolja aims to serve a wide array of property types—from luxury hotels to hostels—offering an all-in-one on-premise system designed for full control. Lodgical, on the other hand, focuses on ease of use and covers essentials for small to mid-sized hotels, resorts, and condominiums, but with a narrower feature set.
Yanolja’s strengths are its comprehensive integrations, including a channel manager, POS, and booking engine, and its presence across 64 countries. Lodgical is more affordable, easier to implement, and offers 29 unique features, though its global reach is limited to North America.
Are you looking for a globally proven platform with extensive integrations? Or do you need a straightforward, cost-effective system for a smaller property?
Edge: Yanolja
If your hotel needs a platform that supports complex operations, broad integrations, and a large user base, go with Yanolja. Its on-premise system is suited for larger, multi-property hotels or resorts that require control and reliability.
If your property is small or mid-sized, prioritizes ease of use, and has budget constraints, Lodgical is a solid fit. Its features like guest CRM, mobile notes, and group management address core needs efficiently, especially if you're in North America.
For hotels aiming to expand or integrate with multiple third-party systems, Yanolja's 157 verified partners make it the more future-proof choice. Conversely, Lodgical's simplicity and affordability appeal to properties that want reliable operations without extensive complexity.
Edge: Yanolja
Yanolja’s user score of 4.77/5 and positive review comments highlight an intuitive interface that new staff can quickly learn. Customers praise its straightforward reservation handling and real-time updates, although some mention the need for faster mobile performance.
Lodgical’s review score of 4.8/5, along with detailed positive feedback from long-term users, indicates a user-friendly design that simplifies both front desk and back-office tasks. It is especially praised for its staff training ease and clear feature set.
Edge: Tie
Yanolja offers 1 unique feature—its on-premise design—focusing on security and speed without internet dependency. Lodgical boasts 29 features, including guest CRM, online check-in/out, digital registration, guest messaging, POS integration, task management, and online booking engine.
While Yanolja’s feature set is centered on operational control and stability, Lodgical provides an extensive suite supporting reservation management, guest communication, and billing—more suited for properties that need comprehensive management tools in one system.
Edge: Lodgical
Yanolja’s support rating of 4.79/5, coupled with reviews praising its dedicated support team, shows strong customer service. Users mention seamless onboarding and responsive help, although some note room for improvement in mobile app performance.
Lodgical’s slightly lower rating of 4.6/5 reflects reliable but less extensively praised support, with reviews emphasizing staff friendliness and prompt responses. Its long-term users express satisfaction with ongoing assistance, but fewer recent reviews limit current insight.
Edge: Yanolja
Yanolja’s integration network boasts 157 verified partners—including Xero, Quickbooks, and multiple booking engines—covering a broad ecosystem. Lodgical has 20 verified integrations, mainly with industry-standard systems like GuestCentric and RateBoard, and a handful of unique partners.
If extensive third-party connectivity is vital for your hotel’s ecosystem, Yanolja’s wider integration network offers greater flexibility. Lodgical’s integrations are sufficient for smaller operations but may need expansion for larger, multi-system setups.
Edge: Yanolja
Yanolja’s overall rating of 4.25/5 is supported by 662 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing ease of use, support, and operational efficiency. Hotels across various segments, especially resorts and hostels, rate it highly.
Lodgical’s five reviews, all positive, focus on its affordability and functionality for smaller hotels. However, the limited review count and lack of recent feedback make it difficult to gauge current hotel satisfaction.
Edge: Yanolja
Yanolja offers a transparent monthly flat fee of $100, with no implementation or trial costs. Lodgical’s pricing details are not publicly available, but it is positioned as an affordable solution for smaller properties.
Given the clear pricing structure of Yanolja, it provides predictable costs, whereas Lodgical’s pricing may vary depending on property size and configuration, potentially requiring direct inquiry.
Edge: Yanolja
Not ideal if your hotel is small, budget-constrained, or primarily North American and prefers simpler, cloud-based systems without extensive integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive integrations, advanced analytics, or operates in multiple regions outside North America.
Yanolja provides a comprehensive, scalable hotel management platform backed by over 660 reviews and a 91.85/100 HTScore, making it the modern standard for large and international properties. Its extensive integrations and global presence position it as the top choice for hotels seeking control, flexibility, and proven performance.
Lodgical offers a feature-rich, easy-to-use PMS with 29 unique capabilities, ideal for small to mid-sized hotels in North America. Its affordability and simplicity suit properties that want reliable management tools without the complexity of larger systems.
For properties aiming for growth, extensive integrations, and global reach, Yanolja is the clear winner. If your hotel is smaller, mainly in North America, and values straightforward management, Lodgical remains a dependable option, though less proven at scale.
In conclusion, prioritize Yanolja if you want a high-rated, well-supported platform with deep integrations and a proven track record. Choose Lodgical if your focus is on a simple, cost-effective management system tailored for smaller, North American hotels.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Yanolja Property Management System 和 Lodgical Solution 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 集中的用户和角色管理 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 18 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多评论都强调了该系统的用户友好型设计,这使得新员工能够轻松上手,快速掌握使用方法。直观的界面简化了日常操作,尤其是在预订和计费流程方面。
Yanolja 因其可靠性而备受赞誉,用户称赞其系统稳健可靠,能够提升部门效率和准确性。该平台在简化前台和收益管理方面的支持尤其受到重视。
Users praise Yanolja for its seamless integration of PMS, Channel Manager, POS, and Booking Engine, enabling efficient operations through real-time up... Users praise Yanolja for its seamless integration of PMS, Channel Manager, POS, and Booking Engine, enabling efficient operations through real-time updates that prevent overbookings and ensure inventory accuracy. The integration notably simplifies reservation handling and outlet billing.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然该系统在运行效率方面表现出色,但用户经常要求提供更高级的报告选项和可自定义的仪表板,以便更好地监控性能并支持决策过程。
用户期待某些高级功能,例如 WhatsApp 发票和更深入的 CRM 集成,能够进一步增强与客户的沟通和运营效率。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Yanolja Property Management System 和 Lodgical Solution 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Yanolja Property Management System 提供 157 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Lodgical Solution 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Yanolja Property Management System 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Yanolja Property Management System:否。Lodgical Solution:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Yanolja Cloud Solution 的 HT Score 为 92,Lodgical Solution 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问