The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 支付处理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | ezypay |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 9 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 27 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 12 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #3 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | ezypay |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #3 17 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #3 15 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 25 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #1 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | ezypay |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #3 51 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #3 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #2 1 条评价 |
Choosing the right payment processing software is crucial for your hotel’s financial efficiency and guest satisfaction. Both ezypay and Zil Money aim to simplify payments, but they diverge in their focus, features, and market presence. ezypay's lack of recent reviews and very limited data suggest it may not currently serve hotel needs effectively, while Zil Money’s active presence and detailed feature set make it a more viable option. Which one truly aligns with your hotel’s priorities?
ezypay’s ratings are nonexistent, indicating no recent reviews or active hotel clientele, which makes it difficult to gauge its suitability. Conversely, Zil Money boasts over 50 reviews with recent feedback, a high NPS score of 8.57/10, and an overall rating of 62.92, signaling strong user satisfaction. The lack of verified integrations and limited regional presence for ezypay further diminish its relevance in hotel operations, whereas Zil Money’s extensive features and global reach suggest better adaptability for hospitality.
Given these disparities, the question becomes: with more recent data supporting Zil Money’s capabilities, is ezypay still a contender? The current review landscape heavily favors Zil Money as the more reliable platform for hotel payment needs.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, flexible financial management platform with multiple payment options, go with Zil Money. Its features include recurring payments, multi-currency settlements, contactless payments, and acceptance of major credit cards, making it suitable for diverse hotel types and regions.
If you prioritize a simple, basic payments processor with minimal feature requirements and are comfortable with unverified performance, ezypay might seem attractive. However, with zero recent reviews and no confirmed hotel use, it likely won’t meet the operational complexity of most hotels today.
For hotels seeking a robust, well-supported solution, Zil Money is the clear choice.
ezypay’s usability ratings are unavailable, and with no recent reviews or onboarding feedback, assessing its user experience is impossible. Zil Money, by contrast, scores 4.5/5 for ease of use, with reviewers praising its intuitive interface and straightforward payment processes. Hotels highlight that setup is quick and staff adoption is smooth, simplifying daily financial tasks.
Given the absence of recent feedback on ezypay’s UI and the positive reviews for Zil Money’s user-friendliness, the edge goes to Zil Money as the easier platform to implement and operate.
ezypay offers no unique features or integrations, limiting its capabilities to basic payment processing. Zil Money provides 15 features exclusive to its platform, including pay-by-link, recurring payments, contactless payments, Apple Pay, Google Pay, Paypal, American Express, and partial capture—covering a broad spectrum of hotel payment needs.
With no shared features and a significant advantage in feature breadth, Zil Money’s wider set of capabilities makes it the more versatile option for hotels aiming for a modern, flexible payment solution.
ezypay’s support ratings are absent, and with no recent reviews or documented customer feedback, assessing its support quality is impossible. Zil Money earns a 4.5/5 for customer support, with hotel reviews indicating responsiveness and helpfulness, though some suggest improvements in faster issue resolution.
Given the limited data and the active, positive support profile for Zil Money, the edge clearly favors Zil Money for reliable assistance and ongoing service.
ezypay’s integration count is one verified partner—Yanolja Cloud Solution—indicating limited connectivity options. Zil Money, however, offers a more extensive API and no less than 0 verified partners, with potential for future expansion, though currently no official third-party integrations are listed.
While ezypay’s single integration limits its utility, Zil Money’s broader approach suggests more room for connecting with other systems, giving it a slight edge in adaptability.
ezypay has no reviews or hotel ratings, making evaluation impossible. Zil Money has amassed 54 reviews, predominantly positive, with an overall score of 62.92. Hotels across various segments—luxury, midscale, and budget—appreciate its ease of use, security, and comprehensive features.
The recent and plentiful reviews for Zil Money strengthen its credibility and indicate a higher satisfaction level among hotel clients. The clear winner here is Zil Money.
ezypay does not publicly disclose pricing details or offer a trial, suggesting a potentially custom quote or limited access. Zil Money charges a base fee of $400, with no free tier or trial available, but offers a 15-day free trial to test the platform.
Given the transparent pricing and trial option, Zil Money provides better clarity on costs, aiding your decision-making process.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
However, due to the lack of recent data, ezypay is likely unsuitable for most modern hotels.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Zil Money’s feature set and positive reviews make it a strong choice for hotels seeking flexibility and reliability.
The core difference lies in their market presence and feature maturity. ezypay appears inactive with no recent hotel reviews, suggesting it may not currently serve hotel industry needs effectively.
If your hotel needs a payment platform with proven performance, multiple features, and active support, Zil Money is the clear choice, offering a robust, scalable solution. Its recent reviews and extensive capabilities set it apart, making it the better fit.
Choose ezypay only if your hotel has very minimal processing requirements and operates in regions where ezypay has a presence. For most hotels, Zil Money provides a more reliable, feature-rich, and supported option.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 | ezypay |
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
工作流程自动化
|
|
|
| 退款管理 | ||
| 预授权 | ||
| 付款拆分 | ||
|
▾
支付方式
|
|
|
| 链接支付 | ||
| 小费功能 | ||
| 部分捕获 | ||
| 定期付款 | ||
| Klarna 分期付款计划 | ||
| 接受苹果支付 | ||
| 邮购电话订单 (MOTO) 付款 | ||
| 接受谷歌支付 | ||
| 分期付款计划 | ||
| 接受贝宝 | ||
| 接受支付宝 | ||
| 接受微信支付 | ||
| 接受签证 | ||
| 接受美国运通 | ||
| 非接触式支付 | ||
| 接受发现 | ||
| 接受万事达卡 | ||
| 接受大来俱乐部 | ||
|
▾
安全与欺诈预防
|
|
|
| 退款管理 | ||
| 支付标记化 | ||
| 预授权 | ||
| 3-D 安全支付 | ||
| PCI合规性 | ||
|
▾
$
多币种
|
|
|
| 多币种结算 | ||
| 动态货币转换 (DCC) | ||
|
▾
调整
|
|
|
| 授权调整 | ||
| 退款管理 | ||
|
▾
硬件
|
|
|
| Elavon(信用卡处理) | ||
| TSYS(信用卡处理) | ||
| GlobalPayments(信用卡处理) | ||
| Vantiv(信用卡处理) | ||
| 第一数据(信用卡处理) | ||
| Heartland(信用卡处理) | ||
| 大通(信用卡处理) | ||
| 多处理器网关 |
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户经常称赞 Zil Money 的直观界面,简化了发票、费用跟踪和其他财务任务。该平台的易用性缩短了入门时间并提高了运营效率。
一些评论表明,客户体验的一些细微改进,例如简化验证流程和减少设置时间,可以使平台更加高效和用户友好。
许多用户强调了 Zil Money 支付处理功能的速度和可靠性,这确保了及时交易并支持酒店的现金流管理。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户看重Zil Money与各种会计和财务软件无缝集成的能力,这有助于整合财务运营并提高效率。
用户建议扩大与更多第三方应用程序的集成,这将提供更多的灵活性和定制性,满足不同的业务需求。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。ezypay 和 Zil Money 共享许多核心 Payments Processing Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。ezypay 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Zil Money 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Zil Money 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
ezypay:否。Zil Money:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Payments Processing Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。ezypay 的 HT Score 为 0,Zil Money 的为 60。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案