The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 声誉管理 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 19 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #5 61 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 43 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #6 14 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #4 66 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #4 72 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #5 62 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #5 10 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #1 70 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #7 39 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #3 16 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #5 4 条评价 |
When choosing a reputation management platform, your hotel needs to evaluate how each product helps monitor, analyze, and respond to guest feedback across multiple channels. Fidelity Online by myHotel and Revinate both aim to improve your online reputation, but they diverge significantly in scope, features, and market presence. Do you prioritize a platform with extensive integrations and proven global reach, or one that offers a more focused, user-friendly interface with a smaller feature set?
While both platforms address online reviews and guest feedback, Revinate’s more comprehensive capabilities and larger review base make it the more robust choice. Are you looking for a platform that scales with your hotel’s growth, or one better suited for smaller or regional properties? Let’s compare how they stack up across key aspects.
Fidelity Online by myHotel is designed primarily for extracting and processing reviews from multiple social media and OTA channels, offering a free, freemium model that includes three OTA sources and three competitors. In contrast, Revinate emphasizes its all-in-one dashboard for managing reviews across over 100 review sites, with a focus on reputation and guest feedback analytics.
Revinate’s platform is much more established, with 116 reviews in the last six months, compared to zero for myHotel, giving it a clear edge in data recency and user feedback. Revinate’s overall rating of 4.41/5 and ease of use score of 4.5/5 far surpass myHotel’s 0/5 ratings, reflecting stronger customer satisfaction and ongoing support. Given the recent reviews and higher engagement, Revinate is the more trusted choice for hoteliers seeking actionable insights.
If your hotel operates in multiple countries or manages several properties, Revinate’s extensive regional presence (37 countries) and 98 verified integrations make it the better fit. Its suite of 53 features—covering alerts, surveys, sentiment analysis, and automation—offer more comprehensive tools for reputation management and guest engagement.
On the other hand, Fidelity Online’s focus on extracting reviews from social media and OTAs might suit smaller hotels or those just starting their reputation tracking journey. If you need in-depth analytics, automation, and integrated review publishing, Revinate’s broader feature set and proven scalability are the clear choice. For properties seeking a simple review aggregator, Fidelity might suffice, but for most hotels, Revinate’s maturity wins.
Revinate scores highly in ease of use, with a 4.5/5 rating and positive reviews praising its intuitive dashboard, quick onboarding, and user-friendly interface. Customers highlight that it simplifies review management and provides clear insights, making it easy to adopt and operate.
Fidelity Online, meanwhile, has no recent reviews or ratings, making its usability hard to gauge. Its limited user feedback suggests it may not be as polished or intuitive as Revinate. Given the recent and detailed positive feedback, Edge: Revinate.
Revinate’s platform boasts 53 features, including real-time alerts, social review tracking, automated email responses, sentiment analysis, and in-stay surveys—many features absent in Fidelity Online. Unique tools like event-based automations, case management, and detailed segmentation give hotels a tactical edge.
Fidelity Online, by comparison, offers no detailed feature count or specific tools beyond review extraction from social and OTA channels. Its core strength is review collection, not comprehensive reputation management. Edge: Revinate.
Revinate’s customer support and onboarding receive a 3.81/5 rating, with many reviews citing helpful, responsive support and useful training materials. Users commend the platform’s ongoing improvements and proactive support, critical to maximizing value.
Fidelity Online, however, has zero recent reviews, making support quality impossible to assess. Given Revinate’s established reputation for responsive support, Edge: Revinate.
Revinate integrates with 98 verified partners, including major PMS, CRM, and digital marketing systems, offering extensive flexibility. Shared integrations with SiteMinder and Cloudbeds facilitate smooth data flow across property management and revenue systems.
Fidelity Online only lists two verified partners, limiting its integration scope significantly. For hotels requiring broad, reliable integrations, Revinate’s ecosystem is the clear leader. Edge: Revinate.
Revinate’s recent reviews reflect an overall rating of 4.41/5, with strong praise across hotel segments, especially for its intuitive interface and comprehensive analytics. Hotels of various sizes, from independents to chains, rate it highly, with many emphasizing its ROI and ease of use.
Fidelity Online has no recent reviews or ratings, leaving its reputation and user satisfaction unverified. Based on current user sentiment and review volume, Edge: Revinate.
Revinate charges a base fee of $800 per month, with no free trial or tiered pricing publicly available. Its pricing reflects its advanced features, integrations, and support.
Fidelity Online offers no publicly available pricing or trial info, making its value unclear. Given Revinate’s transparent pricing and verified feature set, it offers better clarity on investment.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Revinate’s main edge is its comprehensive, feature-rich platform with proven global reach and user satisfaction. It excels at consolidating guest feedback, automating reputation responses, and providing actionable insights, making it suitable for larger, multi-property operations.
If your hotel needs a sophisticated reputation management system capable of integrating with multiple systems and scaling with your growth, Revinate is the clear choice. Its recent reviews, high ratings, and extensive features surpass Fidelity Online’s limited scope and unverified user feedback.
However, if your hotel operates on a tight budget or is just beginning to explore online reputation management, Fidelity’s free, targeted review extraction may serve as a stepping stone. For most hotels aiming to grow and improve their online presence, Revinate offers the reliability, features, and support necessary for long-term success.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
该平台的声誉管理工具经常被提及,因为它能够高效地整合来自多个渠道的评论,使酒店能够快速发现和解决问题。一些评论指出,需要改进与评论网站的实时更新同步。
许多评论都称赞 Revinate 的电子邮件营销功能,包括可自定义的模板和个性化活动的细分,这些功能可提高客户参与度和忠诚度。这可以通过追加销售机会和改善客户体... 许多评论都称赞 Revinate 的电子邮件营销功能,包括可自定义的模板和个性化活动的细分,这些功能可提高客户参与度和忠诚度。这可以通过追加销售机会和改善客户体验来提高收入。
虽然该平台通常与 PMS 系统很好地集成,但一些用户报告了挑战并希望有更简化和灵活的集成流程,特别是与外部 CRM 系统或特定的酒店管理软件的集成。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论建议改进电子邮件设计工具的灵活性和功能。增强的自定义选项(尤其是设计和修改活动视觉效果的选项)经常被提及为需要改进的领域。
批评针对的是 Revinate 无法有效地自动检测无效电子邮件地址。这被视为需要改进的领域,以提高活动的效率和准确性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Fidelity Online 和 Revinate (Reputation) 共享许多核心 Reputation Management 功能,但各有独特的能力。Fidelity Online 提供 2 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Revinate (Reputation) 提供 98 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Revinate (Reputation) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Fidelity Online:否。Revinate (Reputation):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Reputation Management 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。myHotel 的 HT Score 为 0,Revinate 的为 44。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问