项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 208 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Goki 在易用性以及客户支持方面表现出色,尤其适合赌场住宿设施(5.0/5),并拥有移动应用等独家功能。
Hotek Hospitality Group 在宾客体验和便利方面表现出色,尤其适合市中心住宿设施(4.6/5),并拥有白标能力等独家功能。
基于 HTR 上 208 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $400/月 | 起价 $400/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 174 | 34 |
在分析了 208 条经验证的评价后,Goki 用户最看重其 无钥匙进入, 远程访问管理, 宾客沟通,而 Hotek Hospitality Group 用户则强调 宾客体验和便利, 支持、入职和实施, 移动钥匙递送和客人自助入住。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
无钥匙进入
▾
|
+
宾客体验和便利
▾
|
|
+
远程访问管理
▾
|
+
支持、入职和实施
▾
|
|
+
宾客沟通
▾
|
+
移动钥匙递送和客人自助入住
▾
|
|
+
与活动的融合
▾
|
+
安全性、可靠性和正常运行时间
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
连接问题
▾
|
−
报告、日志和管理工具
▾
|
|
−
支持响应时间
▾
|
|
|
−
信号强度
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店无钥匙进入系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 85 条评价 | #5 13 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #2 58 条评价 | #12 5 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 13 条评价 | #10 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #2 11 条评价 | #13 0 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 50 条评价 | #7 15 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #3 31 条评价 | #10 5 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #5 17 条评价 | #13 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #1 21 条评价 | #10 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #5 20 条评价 | #15 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #1 45 条评价 | #3 24 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #4 1 条评价 | — |
Goki and Hotek Hospitality Group both provide keyless entry systems designed to replace traditional hotel keys with digital or mobile access solutions. They primarily differ in their market focus and product approach. Goki leans toward properties emphasizing integrated hardware and software with strong PMS connectivity, appealing especially to hostels and boutique hotels that value seamless digital guest journeys. Hotek Hospitality Group focuses on future-proofing existing hotel locks with cloud-based mobile key functionality, fitting hotels seeking to modernize without full hardware replacement.
Both solve the core problem of eliminating physical keys and keycards to reduce operational friction and improve guest convenience. They enable remote access management and digital key delivery, supporting properties with limited front desk staffing or 24/7 reception. This creates smoother check-ins and greater security by controlling access electronically.
If your property is a hostel, boutique hotel, or limited-service budget hotel—segments where Goki has 174 reviews and scores 4.8/5—choose Goki. Its deep PMS integrations and native mobile app support simplify code generation and guest communication, enhancing operational efficiency and reducing check-in friction. For example, Goki’s integration with Mews and RMS Cloud lets Sydney Lodges automate check-ins and remote lock updates, a workflow praised in case studies.
If you manage a city center hotel, boutique hotel, or multi-location branded hotel, especially in Europe or North America where Hotek operates, consider Hotek Hospitality Group. With 31 reviews and a 4.6/5 rating, Hotek excels in retrofitting existing RFID locks with its GuestKey controller, avoiding costly hardware replacement. It supports app-free mobile keys delivered by SMS or WhatsApp, which suits hotels seeking flexibility and ease of guest adoption. Hotek’s broader integration network (34 verified partners) supports diverse PMS environments, a plus for complex operations.
For luxury hotels or resorts, the data is limited for both products, but Goki’s higher segment ratings and case studies provide stronger evidence for its suitability.
Goki’s ease of use rating is 4.8/5 (174 reviews) compared to Hotek’s 4.5/5 (31 reviews), with onboarding rated 4.6/5 versus 4.2/5 respectively. Reviewers report Goki’s interface and app as intuitive and user-friendly, enabling front desk and operations teams to generate codes with one click and automate guest messaging, reducing manual workload. Hotek users find the system reliable but note that onboarding materials could be improved with more how-to videos, indicating a steeper learning curve for staff.
Staff adoption is smoother with Goki due to the integrated app and straightforward console, while Hotek’s web app and retrofitted locks require more initial training. Support responsiveness, which aids ease of use, also favors Goki (discussed later).
Edge: Goki.
Both products share 11 key features typical for keyless entry systems, such as mobile key delivery, remote access management, and integration with PMS platforms. Goki uniquely offers a dedicated Mobile App that allows hotel staff and guests to manage access and communication natively, improving operational workflows by consolidating control and notifications in one place.
Hotek Hospitality Group’s unique feature is Whitelabel Capability, allowing hotels to brand the mobile key interface and communications, which can enhance guest experience by reinforcing brand identity and providing a consistent digital touchpoint.
Goki’s mobile app changes operations by reducing the need for multiple communication channels and automating guest contact. Hotek’s whitelabeling supports marketing and guest engagement but does not directly impact front desk efficiency.
Edge: Even.
Goki rates 4.7/5 in customer support and 4.6/5 in onboarding across 174 reviews, while Hotek scores 4.4/5 and 4.2/5 respectively from 31 reviews. Goki users describe fast, accurate responses and comprehensive after-sales support, even though some mention time zone delays. Hotek customers praise professional and friendly service but suggest improvements in weekend support and onboarding resources, such as tutorial videos.
Support quality directly affects how quickly hotels resolve lock issues and train staff, impacting daily operations. Goki’s higher ratings and volume indicate more consistent satisfaction with support services.
Edge: Goki.
Hotek Hospitality Group has 34 verified integrations, 25% more than Goki’s 22. Both support major PMS platforms like Mews, Oracle Hospitality, Cloudbeds, Shiji Group, Stayntouch, and Clock. Goki integrates with niche solutions like Bookboost, Preno, and Twilio, which benefit hotels seeking activity promotion and advanced messaging. Hotek’s unique partners include Maestro PMS, innRoad, and RoomRaccoon, which are often used by larger branded and city-center hotels.
Hotels requiring broad PMS compatibility and multi-property system integration will benefit from Hotek’s larger ecosystem. Properties focused on activity integration and guest communication may prefer Goki’s partners.
Edge: Hotek Hospitality Group.
Goki holds a 4.8/5 overall from 174 reviews with no recent reviews in the last six months, indicating a sharp drop in review activity (from 13.3 average per 6 months previously to zero). Hotek rates 4.6/5 based on 31 reviews, including 7 in the last six months, signaling stable current satisfaction though with fewer total ratings.
Segment ratings favor Goki in hostels (4.8/5, 116 reviews), limited service hotels (4.8/5, 114 reviews), and boutique hotels (4.8/5, 50 reviews). Hotek scores highest in boutique hotels (4.6/5, 17 reviews) and city center hotels (4.6/5, 10 reviews). Goki has more reviews and higher ratings across most segments, but the lack of recent reviews suggests caution that its all-time ratings may not reflect current product or team performance.
Edge: Even.
Both Goki and Hotek Hospitality Group list a base price of $400. Neither offers freemium, monthly flat, or per-room pricing models, nor implementation fees or trial periods. Pricing transparency is similar but somewhat limited; Goki users request clearer upfront pricing for grant claims, while Hotek pricing details are stable but not extensively published.
Hotels should budget for similar initial investment but inquire about ongoing costs and possible charges for service or hardware upgrades.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Goki and Hotek Hospitality Group both deliver keyless entry solutions that reduce physical key dependency and streamline guest access. Goki offers a tightly integrated hardware-software system with a native mobile app and extensive PMS partnerships, appealing to hostels and boutique hotels focused on automation and guest communication. Hotek provides a retrofit solution that upgrades existing locks with cloud-based mobile key capability, ideal for city center and branded hotels requiring broader PMS integrations and whitelabel functionality.
Choose Goki if you need automated guest communication workflows, a dedicated app for staff and guests, and proven operational cost savings demonstrated in multiple case studies. These advantages suit small to medium hostels and budget hotels with tech-forward operations.
Choose Hotek Hospitality Group if you want to modernize existing lock infrastructure affordably, require an app-free mobile key system delivered by SMS or WhatsApp, and value wide integration options for multi-property management. Hotek’s whitelabeling also supports hotels emphasizing brand consistency in digital guest experiences.
Note that Goki’s review activity has dropped sharply from 13.3 reviews per six months to zero recently, so its historical high ratings may not fully reflect current product or support quality. Hotek’s smaller but steadier review stream suggests consistent performance but with room to improve onboarding and messaging features. Each product fits distinct operational needs and property types; your choice should align with your hotel’s segment, existing infrastructure, and guest experience priorities.
酒店无钥匙进入系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $400/月 | 起价 $400/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
门五金
|
|
|
| 门五金和锁具 | ||
| 门锁升级套件 | ||
|
▾
访问管理
|
|
|
| 访问管理(基于云) | ||
| 访问管理解决方案(基于服务器) | ||
| 访客管理仪表板 | ||
| Google 钱包集成 | ||
| 多物业管理 | ||
| 通知 | ||
|
▾
访客应用
|
|
|
| 移动应用 | ||
| 白标能力 | ||
| 远程签到 | ||
| 无钥匙进入 | ||
| 苹果手表应用 | ||
|
▾
兼容性
|
|
|
| 门锁升级套件 | ||
| 苹果手表应用 | ||
| 开发者 SDK | ||
| Google 钱包集成 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We want our competitive advantage to be our Efficiency, we seek to differentiate ourselves from the positioning of traditional hostels that run manual operations and define our ide..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"THE BLUE was one of the first fully digital hotels in Australia and with goki having the integration to our preferred PMS it was a no brainer to give it a go. With a contactless an..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
Goki的无钥匙入住系统因其便捷的使用体验和无需实体钥匙而提升安全性而备受赞誉。宾客赞赏其带来的便利,酒店经营者则强调该系统有助于简化入住流程并提高运营效... Goki的无钥匙入住系统因其便捷的使用体验和无需实体钥匙而提升安全性而备受赞誉。宾客赞赏其带来的便利,酒店经营者则强调该系统有助于简化入住流程并提高运营效率。
评论者讨论了远程管理客房访问权限的价值,这可以灵活安排客人的抵达时间,并减轻前台的工作量,对于员工有限或不提供 24 小时服务的酒店来说尤其有利。
集成的消息功能使酒店能够高效地与客人沟通,快速解决客人的疑问或偏好,从而提升客人的体验。该功能尤其因其在告知客人活动或问题方面的透明度而备受赞誉。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
一些评测者提到Goki系统存在连接问题,例如网络中断时会出现故障。这些中断会影响系统的效能,表明其离线功能还有提升空间。
虽然 Goki 的支持团队通常都能及时响应,但一些用户注意到沟通存在延迟,特别是那些与 Goki 支持团队存在较大时区差异的用户。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
评论者一致认为,Hotek 为客人提供更现代、更灵活、更居家般的住宿体验。他们注意到,旅行者,尤其是年轻的、精通科技的客人,对 Hotek 的评价很高,因为入住快... 评论者一致认为,Hotek 为客人提供更现代、更灵活、更居家般的住宿体验。他们注意到,旅行者,尤其是年轻的、精通科技的客人,对 Hotek 的评价很高,因为入住快捷方便,无需传统钥匙或房卡,省去了诸多麻烦。
用户对 Hotek 的支持服务反馈总体积极,工作人员在安装和售后服务方面都表现得快速、友好且乐于助人。少数评论提到启动问题,或指出如果能提供引导式入门指导和... 用户对 Hotek 的支持服务反馈总体积极,工作人员在安装和售后服务方面都表现得快速、友好且乐于助人。少数评论提到启动问题,或指出如果能提供引导式入门指导和更快捷的周末支持,用户体验将会更好。
用户经常反映,Hotek 通过在入住前发送电子房卡,让客人抵达时可以立即用手机打开房门,从而简化了入住流程。这减少了前台接待工作,让客人的入住体验更加顺畅、... 用户经常反映,Hotek 通过在入住前发送电子房卡,让客人抵达时可以立即用手机打开房门,从而简化了入住流程。这减少了前台接待工作,让客人的入住体验更加顺畅、独立,尤其适合那些希望减少前台人员配备的酒店。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
部分用户希望获得更强大的后台管理功能,包括更清晰的日志、更完善的报告和更便捷的管理。他们提到,这些工具将有助于运营监督、故障排除、员工访问权限管理以及... 部分用户希望获得更强大的后台管理功能,包括更清晰的日志、更完善的报告和更便捷的管理。他们提到,这些工具将有助于运营监督、故障排除、员工访问权限管理以及大型团队或多个物业的管理。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Goki 和 Hotek Hospitality Group 共享许多核心 Hotel Keyless Entry Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Goki 提供 22 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Hotek Hospitality Group 提供 34 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Goki 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Goki:否。Hotek Hospitality Group:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Keyless Entry Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Goki 的 HT Score 为 98,Hotek Hospitality Group 的为 90。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐