The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店无钥匙门禁系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 91 条评价 | #11 1 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #3 52 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #2 13 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #2 11 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 50 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #3 30 条评价 | #13 2 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #3 16 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #1 20 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #4 20 条评价 | #10 3 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #1 45 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #3 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right hotel keyless entry system hinges on your property's specific needs, operational priorities, and customer experience goals. Goki by Goki and Loxe by Loxe both aim to eliminate physical keys and enhance guest convenience, but they differ dramatically in scale, features, and reliability. Goki, with its extensive review history and proven track record, stands out as the more trustworthy option. Do you prioritize a well-established system with broad integrations and a focus on hostel markets, or are you seeking a flexible, cost-effective solution with upsell features?
Goki by Goki is the clear leader, boasting over 155 reviews and recent positive feedback, making it the most reliable choice for hotels seeking a proven, comprehensive keyless entry solution. Loxe by Loxe, with just three reviews and a limited global presence, remains a niche product with potential but less dependable data. For your hotel, the choice should be straightforward: go with Goki for stability and proven performance.
Both Goki and Loxe aim to modernize access control, but their approaches differ. Goki offers a robust hardware-software package designed to serve a wide range of hotel types, especially hostels and boutique hotels, with a focus on operational efficiency and extensive PMS integrations. Loxe is primarily a mobile app platform with added upsell features, targeting properties that want to enhance guest engagement and revenue streams.
Goki provides hardware upgrades, API integrations, and a broad partner network, making it suitable for properties ready to invest in a comprehensive, scalable system. In contrast, Loxe mainly offers a BLE upgrade module for existing locks and promotes additional services like guest messaging and mobile room service, appealing to hotels prioritizing upselling and contactless guest experiences. The key question is whether your property values a proven, all-in-one access system or a flexible platform that boosts revenue through app-based features.
If your hotel needs a reliable, well-reviewed digital key system with extensive integrations, choose Goki. Its proven track record with over 155 reviews, including recent ones, highlights its stability and broad compatibility—especially if you operate a hostel or boutique property seeking operational efficiency. Conversely, if your hotel is focused on upselling, guest engagement, and leveraging a mobile app, Loxe offers attractive features like mobile room service and guest messaging, though its limited review base makes its reliability less certain at this stage.
For properties aiming for a scalable, multi-regional solution, Goki’s presence in 16 countries and wide partner network make it an obvious pick. If your primary goal is integrated upselling and you're comfortable with a newer, less proven platform, Loxe could be a fit—but beware of limited data and fewer integrations.
Goki scores a near-perfect 4.79 out of 5 for ease of use, with many reviewers praising its intuitive interface, smooth onboarding, and reliable hardware. Its user-friendly app facilitates self-check-ins and remote management, though some users report connectivity issues that could impede offline use. Support from Goki is rated 4.75 out of 5, with quick responses and proactive assistance.
Loxe, on the other hand, has a perfect 5/5 ease of use rating, with reviews emphasizing its straightforward mobile app and minimal installation effort. However, with only three recent reviews, its real-world usability across diverse hotel types remains less validated. Edge: Goki, for proven ease of integration and support.
Goki offers 9 shared features, including RFID, integration with multiple PMS systems, and remote access management, with 3 exclusive features like Apple Watch App, Developer SDK, and Door Lock Upgrade Kit. These extend its functionality well beyond basic access control.
Loxe provides core features like online check-in/out, mobile keys, guest messaging, and upsell ads, with one unique feature—Whitelabel Capability—allowing branding customization. While Loxe’s feature set is focused on guest engagement and revenue, Goki’s broader hardware and API options give it a distinct edge for hotels seeking operational flexibility. Edge: Goki, for its comprehensive feature set and hardware integrations.
Goki’s customer support scores an impressive 4.75 out of 5, with reviews praising its quick, helpful responses and proactive onboarding support. Users appreciate its reliability, even amid occasional connectivity hiccups.
Loxe also scores a perfect 5/5 in support and onboarding, with reviews emphasizing responsive and attentive customer service. However, limited reviews mean there’s less data to confirm consistent support performance across different properties. Edge: Goki, given its extensive review history and proven support reputation.
Goki boasts 20 verified partners, including major PMS providers like WebRezPro, Mews, Cloudbeds, and RMS, with shared integrations across key systems. Its broad partner network ensures smoother deployment and fewer system conflicts.
Loxe has only two verified integrations, with a focus on PMS systems like WebRezPro and a few others. Its limited integration options restrict its applicability for larger or more complex hotel operations. Edge: Goki, for its extensive integration ecosystem.
Goki currently enjoys a high overall rating of 4.2/5 based on 155 reviews, with recent feedback highlighting its reliability, ease of use, and operational benefits. Hoteliers in varied segments, especially hostels and boutique hotels, value its proven performance and support.
Loxe’s reviews are limited to just three and do not provide enough data for a meaningful segment-based comparison. Given the extensive feedback for Goki, it’s clear that hoteliers rate it significantly higher overall and in terms of satisfaction. Edge: Goki.
Goki charges a flat $400 implementation fee, with no monthly fees or freemium model, making its total cost predictable and straightforward. Loxe’s pricing details are not publicly available, which makes cost comparison difficult but suggests a more flexible or customizable pricing model.
If your budget favors a clear, one-time investment, Goki’s transparent pricing offers peace of mind. Loxe may be appealing if you prefer a potentially lower upfront cost but lack clarity on ongoing expenses.
If your hotel values stability, extensive integrations, and a track record of customer satisfaction, Goki is the clear choice. It’s less suited for properties primarily focused on upsell features or limited regional operation.
Loxe is suitable for properties experimenting with mobile-based guest services or seeking a cost-effective, easy-to-deploy system. It may not yet be the best choice for large, complex hotels needing proven reliability.
Goki offers a comprehensive, well-reviewed, and extensively integrated access control system with proven stability across multiple regions. Its hardware-software combination and broad PMS compatibility make it ideal for hotels seeking operational efficiency and security.
Loxe, while promising with features like upselling and guest messaging, remains a newer platform with limited reviews and integrations. It caters to hotels focused on enhancing guest engagement and revenue through mobile apps but lacks the proven track record of Goki.
In conclusion, if you prioritize reliability, extensive features, and a broad network of integrations, Goki is the recommended choice. If your primary goal is mobile guest engagement and revenue upselling, and you’re willing to accept less proven stability, Loxe could be suitable—but proceed with caution.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We want our competitive advantage to be our Efficiency, we seek to differentiate ourselves from the positioning of traditional hostels that run manual operations and define our ide..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"THE BLUE was one of the first fully digital hotels in Australia and with goki having the integration to our preferred PMS it was a no brainer to give it a go. With a contactless an..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Goki的无钥匙入住系统因其便捷的使用体验和无需实体钥匙而提升安全性而备受赞誉。宾客赞赏其带来的便利,酒店经营者则强调该系统有助于简化入住流程并提高运营效... Goki的无钥匙入住系统因其便捷的使用体验和无需实体钥匙而提升安全性而备受赞誉。宾客赞赏其带来的便利,酒店经营者则强调该系统有助于简化入住流程并提高运营效率。
评论者讨论了远程管理客房访问权限的价值,这可以灵活安排客人的抵达时间,并减轻前台的工作量,对于员工有限或不提供 24 小时服务的酒店来说尤其有利。
集成的消息功能使酒店能够高效地与客人沟通,快速解决客人的疑问或偏好,从而提升客人的体验。该功能尤其因其在告知客人活动或问题方面的透明度而备受赞誉。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评测者提到Goki系统存在连接问题,例如网络中断时会出现故障。这些中断会影响系统的效能,表明其离线功能还有提升空间。
虽然 Goki 的支持团队通常都能及时响应,但一些用户注意到沟通存在延迟,特别是那些与 Goki 支持团队存在较大时区差异的用户。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Goki 和 Loxe 共享许多核心 Hotel Keyless Entry Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Goki 提供 20 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Loxe 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Loxe 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Goki:否。Loxe:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Keyless Entry Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Goki 的 HT Score 为 100,Loxe 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问