The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 175 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Goki 表现出色 在 customer support and ROI 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Access Management Solution (Server Based) and Door Lock Upgrade Kit.
RemoteLock 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Whitelabel Capability.
基于 HTR 上 175 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $400/mo | From $700/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 174 | 1 |
在分析了 175 条经验证的评价后,Goki 用户最看重其 无钥匙进入, 远程访问管理, 宾客沟通,而 RemoteLock 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
无钥匙进入
▾
|
|
|
+
远程访问管理
▾
|
|
|
+
宾客沟通
▾
|
|
|
+
与活动的融合
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
连接问题
▾
|
|
|
−
支持响应时间
▾
|
|
|
−
信号强度
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店无钥匙门禁系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 91 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #3 52 条评价 | #16 1 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #2 13 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #2 11 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 50 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #3 30 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #3 16 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #1 20 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #4 20 条评价 | #12 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #1 45 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #3 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Goki by Goki and RemoteLock by RemoteLock hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational scale, and the level of support you require. Both products address the core challenge of providing secure, keyless access, but they diverge significantly in user experience, features, and market presence.
Goki is a newer, highly-rated system with a focus on ease of use, extensive integrations, and customer satisfaction, while RemoteLock is an older, more established platform with broader compatibility but weaker support and fewer recent reviews. Which system will align best with your hotel's priorities?
Goki and RemoteLock are both designed to improve access control, reduce costs, and streamline operations. Goki’s recent reviews and high ratings (4.2/5 from 155 reviews, with 16 in the last 6 months) demonstrate widespread hoteliers’ confidence, whereas RemoteLock’s only review is from a single user with a poor experience and a rating of 0/5.
Goki boasts a 4.79/5 ease of use score, a 4.75/5 customer support rating, and a 95% likelihood to recommend, underscoring strong customer satisfaction. RemoteLock, despite a perfect 5/5 ease of use rating, suffers from support issues and a very low NPS score of 1/5, suggesting inconsistent user experiences.
Do you prioritize proven support and recent feedback, or are you willing to risk support challenges for potentially broader compatibility? Goki’s recent reviews strongly suggest it’s the more reliable choice now.
If your hotel needs a user-friendly, well-supported keyless access system with strong integrations, go with Goki. Its dedicated focus on hospitality and extensive review base show it’s trusted by a diverse range of properties, from hostels to boutique hotels, with a high likelihood of success.
If your hotel primarily requires broad compatibility with existing smart locks and is comfortable managing support challenges independently, RemoteLock might be suitable. However, given its limited recent reviews and support issues, Goki clearly offers more value per dollar for most hoteliers.
For properties seeking operational efficiency, customer satisfaction, and reliable support, Goki is the safer and smarter pick. RemoteLock could serve niche needs but risks support headaches and lower confidence.
Goki scores a 4.79/5 in ease of use, with users praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. The majority of reviews emphasize how quickly staff adapt and how the system simplifies check-ins, especially for properties with limited front desk hours.
RemoteLock claims a perfect 5/5 in ease of use, but this is not reflected in recent reviews or broader customer feedback. The lone review highlights ease but also notes that when issues arise, support is slow to respond, which can undermine the initial simplicity.
Edge: Goki.
Goki offers 9 shared features, plus 3 exclusive to it, including access management solutions, Apple Watch app, and door lock upgrade kits. It also provides advanced integrations with 20 verified partners, including Mews, Cloudbeds, and Hostaway, offering significant flexibility.
RemoteLock provides 9 shared features but only 1 exclusive feature: whitelabel capability. It integrates with 18 partners, including Bed24 and InnRoad, but lacks some of the advanced access features Goki provides.
Edge: Goki.
Goki’s support ratings are strong, with a 4.75/5 score and numerous positive reviews citing quick, helpful support responses. Reviewers have described Goki’s support as responsive and supportive, with one stating, "The support team is top notch," which is reinforced by recent feedback.
RemoteLock’s customer support scores poorly, with a 1/5 rating and reviews describing long resolution times, unresponsiveness, and frustration with support staff. One reviewer said, "When it works, it is great. When it doesn't, it takes many months to resolve anything."
Edge: Goki.
Goki supports 20 verified integrations, including key PMS systems like Mews, Cloudbeds, and Booking.com, with four shared partners with RemoteLock. Its broader partner ecosystem offers more options for hotels seeking flexible, multi-platform integrations.
RemoteLock supports 18 verified integrations, with several popular property management and booking software but fewer exclusive or advanced integrations. Its narrower ecosystem can limit options for larger or more complex properties.
Edge: Goki.
Goki’s overall rating of 4.2/5 from 155 reviews, with recent feedback, indicates a high level of satisfaction among hoteliers. Its reviews from the last 6 months show a trend of positive experiences, especially regarding support and ease of use.
RemoteLock, with only one review, cannot be reliably rated, but that review was negative, emphasizing poor support and unresolved issues. This makes Goki the clearly preferred choice based on hotelier ratings.
Edge: Goki.
Goki’s pricing is straightforward: a base price of $400 with no freemium options, monthly flat fees, or implementation costs. This transparent pricing makes budgeting easier and offers a lower entry point.
RemoteLock’s base price is higher at $700, with no free tier or trial, and additional costs could be implied. Its pricing model may be less accessible for smaller properties or those seeking clear upfront costs.
Goki is a modern, highly-rated platform built for the hospitality industry, with a focus on ease of use, support, and high-quality integrations. Its recent reviews and strong ratings—especially a 4.2/5 from over 150 hoteliers—confirm its position as the leading choice today.
RemoteLock offers a more established platform with a broad set of integrations but suffers from support issues and a lack of recent positive feedback. Its higher price point and limited recent reviews make it less attractive unless specific legacy compatibility is essential.
For most hotels seeking reliable, well-supported keyless access, Goki is the clear winner. If broad hardware compatibility is your top priority and you’re prepared to manage support challenges, RemoteLock may still be worth considering; but be aware of its support limitations and uncertain recent performance.
酒店无钥匙门禁系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | From $700/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Goki 和 RemoteLock 共享 9 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 白标能力 | ||
| 苹果手表应用 | ||
| 访问管理解决方案(基于服务器) | ||
| 门锁升级套件 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We want our competitive advantage to be our Efficiency, we seek to differentiate ourselves from the positioning of traditional hostels that run manual operations and define our ide..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"THE BLUE was one of the first fully digital hotels in Australia and with goki having the integration to our preferred PMS it was a no brainer to give it a go. With a contactless an..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Goki的无钥匙入住系统因其便捷的使用体验和无需实体钥匙而提升安全性而备受赞誉。宾客赞赏其带来的便利,酒店经营者则强调该系统有助于简化入住流程并提高运营效... Goki的无钥匙入住系统因其便捷的使用体验和无需实体钥匙而提升安全性而备受赞誉。宾客赞赏其带来的便利,酒店经营者则强调该系统有助于简化入住流程并提高运营效率。
评论者讨论了远程管理客房访问权限的价值,这可以灵活安排客人的抵达时间,并减轻前台的工作量,对于员工有限或不提供 24 小时服务的酒店来说尤其有利。
集成的消息功能使酒店能够高效地与客人沟通,快速解决客人的疑问或偏好,从而提升客人的体验。该功能尤其因其在告知客人活动或问题方面的透明度而备受赞誉。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评测者提到Goki系统存在连接问题,例如网络中断时会出现故障。这些中断会影响系统的效能,表明其离线功能还有提升空间。
虽然 Goki 的支持团队通常都能及时响应,但一些用户注意到沟通存在延迟,特别是那些与 Goki 支持团队存在较大时区差异的用户。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Goki 和 RemoteLock 共享许多核心 Hotel Keyless Entry Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Goki 提供 20 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RemoteLock 提供 18 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。RemoteLock 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Goki:否。RemoteLock:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Keyless Entry Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Goki 的 HT Score 为 100,RemoteLock 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问