The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 209 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
GRAND 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Messaging.
RoomRaccoon 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.1/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Payment processing.
基于 HTR 上 209 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $900/mo | From $1,000/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 209 |
在分析了 209 条经验证的评价后,GRAND 用户最看重其 ,而 RoomRaccoon 用户则强调 用户界面和体验, 一体化系统, 自动发送电子邮件和文档。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和体验
▾
|
|
|
+
一体化系统
▾
|
|
|
+
自动发送电子邮件和文档
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
服务和支持
▾
|
|
|
−
集成限制
▾
|
|
|
−
系统错误和稳定性问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #10 90 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #17 27 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #14 7 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #19 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #9 100 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #9 64 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #14 29 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #7 28 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #24 7 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #5 123 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #31 4 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #31 1 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system can dramatically impact your hotel’s operations, revenue, and guest satisfaction. Both GRAND PMS by GRAND and RoomRaccoon PMS aim to streamline hotel management, but they do so with contrasting approaches, features, and focus areas. Your decision hinges on what your hotel needs most—whether it’s a comprehensive, AI-driven platform or a user-friendly, all-in-one solution tailored to smaller hotels. Which product aligns better with your hotel’s goals?
GRAND PMS is a new, cloud-based platform designed to unify hotel and venue operations through AI automation and department collaboration. Its core appeal lies in its broad operational scope, integrating event management, proposals, and automation tools into a single interface. Conversely, RoomRaccoon offers a proven, highly-rated all-in-one solution with a focus on automating reservation management, guest communication, and revenue optimization, especially for small and independent hotels.
While GRAND aims to serve larger properties with complex needs, RoomRaccoon caters to smaller hotels seeking ease of use, automation, and rapid ROI. The key question is whether your hotel prioritizes extensive operational features or a straightforward, efficient management experience.
If your hotel needs a simple, reliable platform that consolidates booking, channel management, and guest communication, RoomRaccoon is the better choice. Many small hotels and boutique properties praise its intuitive interface, automation, and high customer satisfaction, backed by 169 recent reviews and a 4.88/5 rating.
On the other hand, if your hotel operates multiple venues or requires extensive event management, detailed proposals, and department-level integrations, GRAND’s emerging system may suit you better. However, note that GRAND has no reviews yet, so its reliability and user satisfaction remain untested. For most hotels in your position, RoomRaccoon’s proven track record makes it the safer, more dependable option.
RoomRaccoon’s interface scores 4.74/5, with many reviews highlighting its straightforward, user-friendly design. Users frequently mention that new staff pick up the system quickly, and onboarding typically takes a few days; one review states, “The software is so easy to use that I don’t have to spend hours training staff.” Support ratings of 4.53/5 reinforce its solid onboarding and ongoing assistance.
In contrast, GRAND’s user interface ratings are unavailable, but its complex features—like event management and proposal tools—imply a steeper learning curve. Given the extensive feature set, it’s likely more challenging for small teams or less tech-savvy staff to adopt initially.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon boasts 42 unique features, including integrated channel management, dynamic pricing, online check-in, guest profiles, and mobile housekeeping apps—many of which are highly rated and frequently praised in reviews. Its automation capabilities extend to guest communication, invoicing, and revenue management, making daily operations more efficient.
GRAND offers only 5 exclusive features—task management, automated reminders, guest messaging, base pricing, and GDPR compliance—focusing mainly on collaboration and automation. While these are useful, they lack the breadth of operational tools found in RoomRaccoon.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s support team scores 4.53/5, with reviews emphasizing helpful, responsive service. Clients like “The team is eager to take feedback and assist partners, ensuring both satisfaction and smooth operation” support claims of reliable onboarding and ongoing assistance.
GRAND’s support ratings are unavailable, and the lack of reviews makes it difficult to gauge user satisfaction or responsiveness. Given the current evidence, RoomRaccoon’s proven support performance offers more confidence for your hotel’s needs.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s recent reviews, all within the last six months, reveal a 94% likelihood to recommend, with many hotels praising its ease of use, automation, and revenue growth. Hotels like Vila La Personala and Buff & Fellas reported increases in RevPAR and efficiency thanks to RoomRaccoon.
GRAND’s lack of reviews prevents any comparative rating, but the absence itself indicates unconfirmed user satisfaction at this stage. For now, RoomRaccoon’s high, recent ratings affirm its standing.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
GRAND’s pricing details are unavailable, suggesting it might be customized or not publicly disclosed. Conversely, RoomRaccoon charges a flat monthly fee of $1,000, with no implementation or additional charges, making costs transparent and predictable for small hotels.
This pricing clarity favors RoomRaccoon, especially for independent operators seeking budget-friendly, straightforward billing without hidden fees.
Not ideal if...
Not ideal if...
At its core, RoomRaccoon is a proven, highly-rated all-in-one property management system that simplifies small hotel operations through automation, integrations, and user-friendly design. Its extensive feature set, recent positive reviews, and high recommendation rate make it a dependable choice for independent operators.
GRAND aims to serve larger venues with an integrated, AI-powered platform that can handle complex event management and multi-venue operations. However, without user reviews or proven support data, its suitability remains uncertain for most small hotels.
If your hotel values ease of use, proven support, and a feature-rich platform, RoomRaccoon is the clear choice. For hotels needing large-scale operational tools and customized workflows, GRAND might become relevant once it gains more market traction and reviews.
In conclusion, based on current user feedback, review volume, and recent ratings, RoomRaccoon provides the more reliable, tested solution for small and boutique hotels. Its extensive feature set and high customer satisfaction make it the safer, more immediate fit—especially if your hotel aims to automate, grow revenue, and deliver better guest experiences without extensive training or complex setups.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $1,000/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,GRAND PMS 和 RoomRaccoon PMS 共享 9 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 交付过程 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| 管家模块 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 35 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多用户认为 RoomRaccoon 的用户界面直观易学,简化了日常操作和新员工入职培训。不过,也有改进建议,尤其是针对移动和平板电脑版本的系统,以进一步提高可用... 许多用户认为 RoomRaccoon 的用户界面直观易学,简化了日常操作和新员工入职培训。不过,也有改进建议,尤其是针对移动和平板电脑版本的系统,以进一步提高可用性。
RoomRaccoon 用户称赞该平台的一体化特性,它集成了预订引擎、渠道管理器、PMS 和会计功能。这种整合有助于简化操作并消除对多个软件解决方案的需求。许多评论强... RoomRaccoon 用户称赞该平台的一体化特性,它集成了预订引擎、渠道管理器、PMS 和会计功能。这种整合有助于简化操作并消除对多个软件解决方案的需求。许多评论强调此功能如何节省时间并使管理更加轻松。
酒店经营者认为自动电子邮件和文档功能特别有价值,并指出它可以节省时间并增强与客人的沟通。自动发票和入住前/入住后电子邮件是经常被提及的好处。用户还称赞... 酒店经营者认为自动电子邮件和文档功能特别有价值,并指出它可以节省时间并增强与客人的沟通。自动发票和入住前/入住后电子邮件是经常被提及的好处。用户还称赞这些自动化功能的自定义选项。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然有些用户赞赏个别客户支持代理的帮助,但许多评论都批评 RoomRaccoon 支持团队的可用性和响应能力。问题解决时间过长,尤其是在关键运营期间,是常见的投诉... 虽然有些用户赞赏个别客户支持代理的帮助,但许多评论都批评 RoomRaccoon 支持团队的可用性和响应能力。问题解决时间过长,尤其是在关键运营期间,是常见的投诉。
一些评论指出,RoomRaccoon 与其他系统(如支付网关(Stripe、会计软件)和 OTA)的集成存在局限性。用户表示希望实现更无缝的集成,以避免手动工作和额外费用。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。GRAND PMS 和 RoomRaccoon PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。GRAND PMS 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RoomRaccoon PMS 提供 88 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。RoomRaccoon PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
GRAND PMS:否。RoomRaccoon PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。GRAND 的 HT Score 为 0,RoomRaccoon 的为 80。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问