The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 28 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Guest Driven 表现出色 .
LIKE MAGIC 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Messaging and Guest Profiles.
基于 HTR 上 28 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $700/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 2 | 26 |
在分析了 28 条经验证的评价后,Guest Driven 用户最看重其 ,而 LIKE MAGIC 用户则强调 运营效率, 宾客体验, 降低复杂性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
|
|
+
宾客体验
▾
|
|
|
+
降低复杂性
▾
|
|
|
+
预订引擎性能
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
定制和品牌推广
▾
|
|
|
−
房间升级功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #31 0 条评价 | #8 10 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #14 8 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | #25 1 条评价 | #13 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #20 1 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #25 2 条评价 | #17 6 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | #29 1 条评价 | #28 2 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #24 1 条评价 | #16 3 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #16 1 条评价 | #4 13 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #29 2 条评价 | #30 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #9 24 条评价 |
Choosing between Guest Driven and LIKE MAGIC hinges on what your hotel needs most—whether it’s a focus on guest engagement, integration capabilities, or operational automation. Guest Driven offers a mobile engagement platform aimed at personalized guest interactions, while LIKE MAGIC delivers an all-in-one guest journey app with extensive features. Both aim to enhance guest experiences and boost revenue, but their approaches and strengths differ significantly.
Guest Driven emphasizes targeted mobile outreach and insights, but its limited review count and recent activity weaken confidence in its ongoing support and innovation. LIKE MAGIC, with over 26 reviews and consistent recent feedback, stands out as the more proven and comprehensive solution. Which aligns best with your hotel’s priorities?
Guest Driven specializes in mobile guest engagement, providing tools to personalize interactions based on guest preferences and behaviors. It’s tailored for hotels wanting to deepen guest relationships through targeted marketing and insights, but it’s limited in features and integration options. LIKE MAGIC, on the other hand, offers a full guest journey platform with integrated features like online check-in, messaging, digital keys, and upsell offers, all in one app.
While Guest Driven has a modest review count (only 2, with no recent feedback), its core value lies in real-time guest insights. LIKE MAGIC, with 26 reviews—and two in the past six months—demonstrates a more current, robust user base and ongoing product evolution. Do you prioritize deep guest insights or a comprehensive operational platform?
If your hotel needs a straightforward mobile engagement solution to foster personalized guest relationships and targeted marketing, Guest Driven might be suitable, especially if your property is independent or small. However, given its limited features and minimal recent reviews, its support and development appear less active.
If your hotel needs a complete guest experience platform with features like online check-in, digital messaging, request management, and integrations, LIKE MAGIC is the clear choice. It’s better suited for hotels seeking operational automation, extensive features, and a proven track record with recent positive reviews—especially in Europe and for various property types.
For most hotels, especially those aiming for a seamless guest journey with broad functionality and reliable support, LIKE MAGIC offers a more dependable and scalable solution.
Guest Driven has a user rating of 4.5/5 for ease of use based on limited reviews, with feedback praising its simplicity and reliability. However, some users point out sluggish load times and design limitations, which could hinder staff adoption over time. Its onboarding process scores around 3.5/5, indicating room for improvement in user training and setup.
LIKE MAGIC boasts a slightly higher ease-of-use rating of 4.96/5, supported by recent reviews highlighting its intuitive interface, quick onboarding (rated 4.8/5), and seamless integration with existing systems. Feedback emphasizes how straightforward it is for staff to implement and operate.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Guest Driven offers no unique features beyond its core guest engagement concept, focusing on targeted messaging and insights. Conversely, LIKE MAGIC provides 10 distinct features, including request management, room service ordering, guest messaging, digital keys, a web-app, guest profiles, payments, mobile checkout, and more.
The breadth of features in LIKE MAGIC—covering operational tasks and guest services—gives it a clear advantage. It consolidates many functions into one app, reducing the need for external systems and multiple interfaces.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Guest Driven’s support ratings are notably low, at just 1.5/5, with reviews citing sluggish responses and inconsistent knowledge among support staff. Its limited review count and absence of recent feedback make it difficult to gauge ongoing support quality.
LIKE MAGIC, with a 4.85/5 support rating and recent reviews, demonstrates consistent responsiveness and knowledgeable assistance. Customers praise their quick, helpful responses, and the company’s rapid product evolution indicates strong ongoing support.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Guest Driven has no verified integrations listed, suggesting limited or no third-party connectivity options. This could restrict your hotel’s ability to connect with existing systems or expand functionality.
LIKE MAGIC, with 10 verified partners—including industry-standard platforms like Mews, Oracle Hospitality, and Adyen—offers extensive integrations. This connectivity enhances operational efficiency and allows your hotel to build a tailored tech ecosystem.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Guest Driven’s overall rating of 3.75/5 is based on just 2 reviews, with no recent feedback to support current performance. Its user base appears limited, with only independent and branded hotel reviews.
LIKE MAGIC, rated 77.11/100 with 26 reviews—two in the past six months—has a strong recent approval rating of 99% likelihood to recommend. Its diverse user base across regions and hotel types supports a broader, more current validation of its effectiveness.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Guest Driven does not publicly disclose its pricing, suggesting a potentially customized quote model or higher tiers aimed at larger clients. LIKE MAGIC charges $700 per month, with no trial or implementation fees, making its pricing transparent and predictable.
Given the limited transparency around Guest Driven’s costs, budget-conscious hotels might favor LIKE MAGIC for its straightforward, predictable subscription fee.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference between these solutions is scope. Guest Driven focuses on targeted mobile engagement, offering insights and personalized messaging, while LIKE MAGIC delivers a comprehensive guest experience platform with operational features.
Choose Guest Driven if your goal is to deepen guest relationships through personalized outreach and insights, and your property is smaller or independent. Its limited features, support, and recent reviews make it more suitable for niche engagement.
Opt for LIKE MAGIC if you want a broad, scalable platform that automates guest interactions, integrates with existing systems, and provides extensive features. Its recent reviews, high ratings, and verified integrations make it the more reliable choice for hotels seeking an all-in-one solution.
For most hotels aiming to enhance guest satisfaction and streamline operations simultaneously, LIKE MAGIC offers a stronger, more proven platform.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $700/mo |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Communication & Messaging
|
|
|
| 自动翻译(多语言) | ||
| 请求管理 | ||
| 客房服务订购 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 应用下载 | ||
| 网络应用 | ||
|
▾
Content Management
|
|
|
| 酒店目录 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 当地推荐 | ||
| 网络应用 | ||
|
▾
Upselling
|
|
|
| 付款 | ||
| 客房服务订购 | ||
|
▾
Request Management
|
|
|
| 请求管理 | ||
| 客房服务订购 | ||
| 移动结帐 | ||
| 手机值机 |
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Like Magic allowed us to operate with just six staff members, without compromising guest experience. The platform is easy to use, fun to work with, and has revolutionized how we ru..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"LIKE MAGIC isn't just a tool for us, it's the backbone of our overall guest experience. If I ever worked somewhere else, I'd bring it with me."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
LikeMagic 通过提供在线入住和集成预订引擎等功能,显著提升了酒店的运营效率。它使酒店能够实现诸多流程的自动化,减少对外部系统的依赖,从而使员工能够更专注... LikeMagic 通过提供在线入住和集成预订引擎等功能,显著提升了酒店的运营效率。它使酒店能够实现诸多流程的自动化,减少对外部系统的依赖,从而使员工能够更专注于提升宾客体验。
宾客使用该应用程序可获得流畅全面的体验,享受从入住到退房的无缝互动和井然有序的流程。个性化的宾客体验是一大亮点,显著提升了宾客满意度。
LikeMagic 通过提供一体化解决方案,消除了对多个第三方接口的需求,从而降低了酒店运营的复杂性,进而降低了运营成本和复杂性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户对平台取消自定义品牌功能感到失望,这凸显了对访客门户网站的 UI 和 UX 进行更多个性化控制的必要性,以便更好地与他们的品牌保持一致。
用户表达了希望集成房间升级功能的愿望,以便客人能够通过应用程序轻松升级房间,目前该功能尚不具备,并被认为是一项潜在的改进措施。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Guest Driven (merged with Porter & Sail) 和 LIKE MAGIC 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Guest Driven (merged with Porter & Sail) 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 LIKE MAGIC 提供 10 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。LIKE MAGIC 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Guest Driven (merged with Porter & Sail):否。LIKE MAGIC:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Guest Driven 的 HT Score 为 0,LIKE MAGIC 的为 78。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案