The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | #14 1 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #6 19 条评价 | #22 4 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #3 7 条评价 | #15 2 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #10 2 条评价 | #14 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 17 条评价 | #24 2 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #9 13 条评价 | #19 3 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #5 14 条评价 | #19 2 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #8 3 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #16 2 条评价 | #21 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #6 21 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #15 0 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #6 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Hub OS Guest in Touch and Guest Services by SmartStay hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both address guest engagement, but Hub OS offers a contactless communication platform primarily focused on operational management, while SmartStay centers on digital check-in, upselling, and in-room service features. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize streamlined internal communication or elevating the guest experience with upselling and in-room tech.
Given the current landscape, which product aligns better with your property’s strategic goals and operational challenges?
Both products aim to improve hotel operations and guest satisfaction, yet they serve different core functions. Hub OS Guest in Touch emphasizes real-time communication between guests and staff, focusing on incident reporting, maintenance, and departmental coordination, making it ideal for hotels seeking operational cohesion. Conversely, Guest Services by SmartStay concentrates on digital guest onboarding, upselling, and in-room services, making it suitable for properties keen on enhancing the guest journey, especially with mobile and self-service features.
While Hub OS has a higher overall rating (4.69/5) and more recent reviews, it primarily excels at internal management with limited guest-facing features. SmartStay, despite a lower rating (0/5) due to fewer reviews, offers a broad suite of features like contactless check-in, digital ordering, and upselling. Which of these core functions aligns better with your current priorities?
If your hotel needs a robust system to streamline incident management, departmental communication, and maintenance workflows, Hub OS is the clear choice. Its high review count (27 reviews) and recent positive feedback underscore its reliability for operational tasks.
If your hotel aims to elevate the guest experience through digital check-in, room selection, upselling, and in-room ordering, then SmartStay’s platform is more aligned. Despite fewer reviews, its comprehensive feature set for guest engagement makes it a compelling option for tech-forward properties.
Your decision should hinge on whether operational efficiency or guest experience enhancement is your priority—both are critical, but one may serve your immediate goals better.
Hub OS scores 4.87/5 for ease of use, with reviews emphasizing its intuitive interface and simple onboarding process. Users mention that staff quickly adapt, highlighting the platform’s user-friendly design and real-time feedback features, though some note occasional crashes and synchronization issues.
SmartStay’s platform scores 4.57/5, with praise for its clean, tidy interface and smooth onboarding. Reviewers appreciate its straightforwardness, despite limited overall review volume.
Edge: Hub OS, due to higher review volume and slightly better user ratings, indicating broader user confidence in its usability.
Hub OS offers 3 unique features: a web app, room service ordering, and request management, focusing on operational communication. Its core strengths lie in incident tracking and departmental coordination, ideal for hotels prioritizing internal workflows.
SmartStay boasts 20 features, including a hotel website check-in portal, lobby kiosk, self-service check-in/out, device agnosticism, custom questions, document scanning, ID verification, multilingual support, payment processing, and door lock integration. These features support a comprehensive guest journey and in-room experience.
Given the sheer number of features, SmartStay provides a more extensive guest-facing toolkit.
Edge: SmartStay, due to its broader suite of features designed to elevate guest engagement and operational integration.
Hub OS receives a 4.74/5 support rating, with reviews highlighting quick, proactive responses and attentive customer service. Users appreciate that the support team is highly involved and resolves issues swiftly, ensuring minimal disruption.
SmartStay’s support rating is slightly lower at 4.29/5, with reviews describing the team as knowledgeable and responsive but noting occasional disagreements or minor delays.
Edge: Hub OS, because of its higher support rating and more positive recent review sentiment.
Hub OS integrates with 23 verified partners, including major PMS, POS, and distribution systems like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and RMS. Its extensive partner network facilitates seamless operational workflows and data sharing.
SmartStay connects with 8 verified partners, including Shiji Group and Cloudbeds. While its integration ecosystem is smaller, it covers key systems like PMS and POS, with ongoing future plans.
Edge: Hub OS, thanks to its significantly larger and more diverse integration footprint, offering broader connectivity.
Hub OS’s 27 reviews, predominantly from various hotel types, yield an average rating of 4.69/5, with a 97% likelihood to recommend. Reviewers from luxury, boutique, and resort hotels praise its operational impact and ease of use.
SmartStay has only 7 reviews with an overall rating of 0, making its data less reliable. The limited feedback suggests a need for more user input to gauge true satisfaction.
Edge: Hub OS, with more recent reviews and a higher, more consistent rating across segments.
Hub OS does not publicly disclose pricing, implying its cost may be customized based on hotel size and needs, often typical for enterprise solutions.
SmartStay charges a base price of $500 per month, with no indication of tiered pricing or additional fees. Its transparent pricing simplifies budgeting for smaller or mid-sized hotels.
If precise costs are critical, Hub OS’s custom quotes may be a barrier, while SmartStay’s flat fee offers clarity.
Not ideal if you prioritize guest-facing technology over internal communication or have a small property with simple operations.
Not ideal if your hotel does not prioritize digital guest interactions or lacks the infrastructure for mobile-focused services.
Hub OS’s strength lies in operational management, with high-quality incident reporting and departmental coordination. Its broader integration network and higher user ratings make it a reliable choice for hotels seeking efficiency and internal communication.
SmartStay excels in guest engagement, offering a broad suite of features to enhance the guest journey through digital check-in, upselling, and in-room services. Its lower rating and fewer reviews suggest it may still be maturing, but the feature set is promising for future growth.
If your primary goal is operational efficiency, Hub OS is the safer, more proven option. If elevating guest experience and generating ancillary revenue are your priorities, SmartStay offers a compelling, feature-rich platform worth monitoring.
In conclusion, choose Hub OS if your hotel needs a trusted system for internal communication and maintenance. Opt for SmartStay if your focus is on creating a modern, interactive guest journey with upselling and in-room service capabilities. Both have their merits, but current data and review volume favor Hub OS as the more established solution.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Hub OS 在促进酒店各部门之间的沟通方面表现出色。评论强调了报告问题和在团队之间分配任务的便利性,从而促进了协调努力并改善了服务交付。此功能极大地增强了... Hub OS 在促进酒店各部门之间的沟通方面表现出色。评论强调了报告问题和在团队之间分配任务的便利性,从而促进了协调努力并改善了服务交付。此功能极大地增强了整体运营流程。
用户对 Hub OS 简化维护操作的能力表示赞赏。它提供快速报告和解决故障的功能,从而减少停机时间和运营效率低下。该软件允许团队实时跟踪和传达维护问题,从而更... 用户对 Hub OS 简化维护操作的能力表示赞赏。它提供快速报告和解决故障的功能,从而减少停机时间和运营效率低下。该软件允许团队实时跟踪和传达维护问题,从而更快地解决问题。
虽然许多用户认为 Hub OS 界面友好且外观精美,但有些人在使用过程中遇到了一些问题,例如偶尔崩溃或延迟。尽管存在这些问题,但用户仍然欣赏该软件如何简化复杂... 虽然许多用户认为 Hub OS 界面友好且外观精美,但有些人在使用过程中遇到了一些问题,例如偶尔崩溃或延迟。尽管存在这些问题,但用户仍然欣赏该软件如何简化复杂的任务。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户经常提到的一个问题是存在技术故障。这些包括同步延迟、偶尔崩溃和界面错误。虽然这些问题通常可以很快得到解决,但它们仍然会扰乱酒店运营。
Hub OS 的移动可访问性值得称赞,它使酒店员工能够随时随地管理运营。此功能对于报告问题和快速访问重要数据特别有用,从而节省时间并提高整体效率。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Hub OS Guest in Touch 和 Guest Services by SmartStay 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Hub OS Guest in Touch 提供 23 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Guest Services by SmartStay 提供 8 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Hub OS Guest in Touch 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Hub OS Guest in Touch:否。Guest Services by SmartStay:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。hub OS 的 HT Score 为 22,Liverton 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问