The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 245 条经验证的评价后,hub OS 用户最看重其 部门间沟通, 维护管理, 用户界面 (ui),而 STAY 用户则强调 客户体验优化, 移动和用户体验, 运营效率。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
部门间沟通
▾
|
+
客户体验优化
▾
|
|
+
维护管理
▾
|
+
移动和用户体验
▾
|
|
+
用户界面 (UI)
▾
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
|
+
定制
▾
|
+
支持和服务
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
技术故障
▾
|
−
CMS 和定制
▾
|
|
−
移动无障碍
▾
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
|
−
分析和报告
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #14 1 条评价 | #9 10 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #6 19 条评价 | #4 83 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #3 7 条评价 | #2 89 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #10 2 条评价 | #2 24 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 17 条评价 | #2 77 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #9 13 条评价 | #2 88 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #5 14 条评价 | #3 91 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #8 3 条评价 | #6 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #16 2 条评价 | #5 27 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #6 21 条评价 | #3 112 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #15 0 条评价 | #6 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | #6 2 条评价 | #7 2 条评价 |
Choosing between Hub OS Guest in Touch and STAY Guest App hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational goals. While both aim to improve guest communication and streamline hotel services, they address different operational priorities and user experience nuances. Your decision should reflect your hotel's size, guest engagement strategy, and technological readiness.
Both products serve the hotel guest app category effectively, but one has a significantly larger user base and more recent reviews, which can influence reliability and ongoing development. Which platform aligns best with your hotel’s digital strategy?
Hub OS Guest in Touch is a web-based guest communication solution primarily focused on contactless service requests and maintenance management. It excels at internal communication and operational coordination but lacks advanced guest-facing features like in-app messaging or hotel directories.
STAY Guest App, contrastingly, offers an all-in-one mobile app for guests, including features like chatbots, in-app messaging, and integrated hotel directories, making it more comprehensive for guest engagement. Do you prioritize internal operational communication or guest-facing digital services?
If your hotel needs a robust mobile platform that enhances direct guest engagement through features like messaging, reservations, and real-time updates, STAY is the better fit. It caters well to properties aiming to digitize their guest experience, especially those with a focus on sustainability and operational efficiency through automation.
Conversely, if your team’s primary concern is internal communication, incident reporting, and maintenance management without heavy guest-facing features, Hub OS offers a streamlined web solution proven to improve operational workflows and inter-departmental communication.
In essence, choose STAY if guest experience and digital convenience are your priorities. Opt for Hub OS if operational communication and maintenance coordination are more critical.
Hub OS has a high ease-of-use rating of 4.87/5, praised for its intuitive interface and quick onboarding process. Reviewers highlight how all hotel staff, including cleaning companies, find it straightforward to navigate, with minimal training required.
STAY also boasts a solid user experience with a 4.78/5 rating, praised for its simplicity and clarity, though some users note that language options could be expanded. Given the larger user base and recent reviews emphasizing ease, Hub OS’s user-friendliness is slightly more prominent.
Edge: Hub OS Guest in Touch.
STAY offers 11 unique features, including a mobile app, chatbot, automated replies, guest messaging, local recommendations, hotel directory, app download, automatic translations, mobile checkout, and guest profiles. These features provide a full guest engagement toolkit that Hub OS lacks.
Hub OS, on the other hand, is limited to three shared features, mainly focused on internal communication and incident management. Its core strength is operational incident reporting rather than guest-facing services.
Edge: STAY Guest App.
Hub OS scores slightly higher in customer support ratings at 4.74/5, with reviews emphasizing quick, proactive assistance and a dedicated support team. Users appreciate the company’s commitment to resolving issues swiftly, especially in operational contexts.
STAY also garners high support ratings at 4.83/5 but has fewer reviews overall. Some users mention the absence of phone support and limited regional support hours, which can slow issue resolution.
Edge: STAY Guest App.
Hub OS has 23 verified integrations, including major partners like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and Planet, with some unique integrations like HiJiffy and Newhotel. Its broad partner network enhances flexibility for larger hotel chains.
STAY has 20 verified integrations, including Hotelkit, SiteMinder, and Vingcard, with strong links to PMS and CRM systems. Its integration ecosystem is slightly smaller but still substantial for most hotel operations.
Edge: Hub OS Guest in Touch.
Hub OS has a higher overall rating of 4.69/5 from 27 reviews, mostly from hotels in Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. The reviews praise its operational improvements, especially in maintenance and inter-department communication.
STAY has a lower overall rating of 3/5 from 206 reviews, predominantly from North American and large resort properties. While its user interface is lauded for simplicity, some feedback highlights slow reporting and limited language options.
Edge: Hub OS Guest in Touch.
Hub OS does not publicly list pricing; it appears to follow a custom quote model, likely based on hotel size and scope. No trial or freemium options are available.
STAY’s base price is $300 per month, with no trial or implementation fees, making it a predictable cost for hotels looking for straightforward budgeting. Its transparent pricing can help your team plan investments better.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Hub OS Guest in Touch excels at operational incident management and internal communication, making it ideal for hotels seeking to optimize daily workflows. Its recent reviews and higher HT scores reinforce its reliability for operational teams.
STAY Guest App shines in guest engagement with a feature-rich mobile platform that enhances the guest experience, reduces queues, and drives revenue. Its larger review base and product scope make it a compelling choice for properties prioritizing guest satisfaction.
If your hotel’s core need is internal operation efficiency, Hub OS is the clear winner. For hotels committed to a comprehensive guest experience, STAY provides a broader set of features and proven impact.
In conclusion, select Hub OS if your hotel wants to improve maintenance, incident reporting, and inter-departmental communication. Opt for STAY if elevating guest engagement, reducing wait times, and increasing revenue are your priorities.
Trust your hotel’s priorities and operational focus to guide your decision—both platforms deliver value, but only one aligns perfectly with your specific needs.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Hub OS 在促进酒店各部门之间的沟通方面表现出色。评论强调了报告问题和在团队之间分配任务的便利性,从而促进了协调努力并改善了服务交付。此功能极大地增强了... Hub OS 在促进酒店各部门之间的沟通方面表现出色。评论强调了报告问题和在团队之间分配任务的便利性,从而促进了协调努力并改善了服务交付。此功能极大地增强了整体运营流程。
用户对 Hub OS 简化维护操作的能力表示赞赏。它提供快速报告和解决故障的功能,从而减少停机时间和运营效率低下。该软件允许团队实时跟踪和传达维护问题,从而更... 用户对 Hub OS 简化维护操作的能力表示赞赏。它提供快速报告和解决故障的功能,从而减少停机时间和运营效率低下。该软件允许团队实时跟踪和传达维护问题,从而更快地解决问题。
虽然许多用户认为 Hub OS 界面友好且外观精美,但有些人在使用过程中遇到了一些问题,例如偶尔崩溃或延迟。尽管存在这些问题,但用户仍然欣赏该软件如何简化复杂... 虽然许多用户认为 Hub OS 界面友好且外观精美,但有些人在使用过程中遇到了一些问题,例如偶尔崩溃或延迟。尽管存在这些问题,但用户仍然欣赏该软件如何简化复杂的任务。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户经常提到的一个问题是存在技术故障。这些包括同步延迟、偶尔崩溃和界面错误。虽然这些问题通常可以很快得到解决,但它们仍然会扰乱酒店运营。
Hub OS 的移动可访问性值得称赞,它使酒店员工能够随时随地管理运营。此功能对于报告问题和快速访问重要数据特别有用,从而节省时间并提高整体效率。
排名更高的方面
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便... 多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便利。
该应用的用户界面和移动体验因其直观和易于操作而广受好评。无论是酒店员工还是客人,用户都发现更新信息和管理内容非常简单。
STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现... STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现可持续发展目标。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
CMS 的亮点在于它的易用性和定制功能,但用户也指出了一些需要改进的地方,特别是在设计和功能方面的灵活性。
用户对 STAY 与各种内部应用程序和系统(包括 PMS 和 CRM 系统)的强大集成功能表示赞赏。这些集成简化了数据管理,并有助于为员工和客人提供无缝体验。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Hub OS Guest in Touch 和 STAY Guest App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Hub OS Guest in Touch 提供 23 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 STAY Guest App 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Hub OS Guest in Touch 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Hub OS Guest in Touch:否。STAY Guest App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。hub OS 的 HT Score 为 22,STAY 的为 47。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问