The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | #14 1 条评价 | #34 0 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #6 19 条评价 | #18 4 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #3 7 条评价 | #26 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #10 2 条评价 | #22 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 17 条评价 | #20 2 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #9 13 条评价 | #20 2 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #5 14 条评价 | #30 0 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #8 3 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #16 2 条评价 | #12 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #6 21 条评价 | #20 2 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #15 0 条评价 | #17 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | #6 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between hub OS Guest in Touch and Zaplox Premium Guest App hinges on what your hotel prioritizes—whether operational efficiency or guest experience. Both solutions aim to enhance contactless interactions but diverge significantly in scope, features, and user feedback. How do their strengths align with your hotel’s specific needs?
hub OS offers a web-based communication platform focused on streamlining internal operations and maintenance, while Zaplox provides a fully branded mobile app that puts guest convenience front and center. Are you looking to improve internal workflows or elevate the guest mobile experience?
Both products solve the challenge of contactless communication, but their approaches differ. hub OS emphasizes internal communication, maintenance management, and operational coordination, whereas Zaplox centers on delivering a comprehensive mobile guest journey, including check-in, keyless entry, and service requests.
hub OS’s strength lies in its ability to connect various departments through its web app, making it ideal for hotels aiming to enhance operational efficiency and incident management. Zaplox excels in creating a seamless, branded mobile experience that reduces front desk interactions and promotes safety—best suited for hotels prioritizing guest contactless engagement.
Are you more focused on internal communication efficiency or guest-facing digital tools?
If your hotel needs to streamline operational workflows, manage maintenance requests, and improve inter-department communication, hub OS is the better choice. Its high ratings—4.69/5 overall, 4.87/5 ease of use, and 97% likelihood to recommend—reflect its strong performance in enhancing hotel operations.
Conversely, if your hotel requires a customizable mobile app to enable contactless check-in, mobile keys, and guest messaging, Zaplox offers a broad suite of features, including mobile payment and concierge services. Its niche focus on guest experience is reflected in its reviews, with an overall rating of 3.33/5 and a 82% recommendation rate, indicating room for growth but solid potential.
For operational hotels that want to optimize internal processes, go with hub OS. For guest-centric properties looking to reduce physical contact and improve mobile engagement, choose Zaplox.
hub OS boasts an impressive ease of use rating 4.87/5, with reviewers calling it user-friendly for all hotel staff and noting the straightforward onboarding process. Reviews highlight its intuitive interface and quick adoption, even across diverse departments, with many praising its mobile accessibility for on-the-go management.
Zaplox, with a 3.33/5 ease of use score, receives mixed feedback. Reviewers mention its mobile app is generally user-friendly but note some issues with integrations, particularly with PMS systems like Opera, which can hinder staff adoption.
Edge: hub OS.
hub OS offers 2 core features, including its contactless communication web app, which enables requesting services, reporting incidents, and communicating with staff—all accessible via browser. Zaplox, with 13 features, provides a comprehensive suite: mobile check-in, digital keys, guest messaging, local recommendations, mobile payment, and more.
Zaplox’s extensive feature set surpasses hub OS in scope, offering functionalities that create a full mobile guest journey. hub OS’s unique feature is its web-app contactless communication, but Zaplox’s ability to integrate multiple guest services is a clear advantage.
Edge: Zaplox.
hub OS’s support rating of 4.74/5 is backed by reviews describing quick, proactive, and helpful customer service. Users appreciate the responsiveness and the company’s commitment to resolving issues, which is critical given some reports of technical glitches.
Zaplox’s support scores slightly lower at 4/5, with reviews citing responsive communication but also highlighting occasional delays and integration challenges. Given the more positive feedback on hub OS, it’s the supported choice for hotel teams prioritizing reliable assistance.
Edge: hub OS.
hub OS boasts 23 verified partners, including major PMS and channel managers like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and Infor. Zaplox has 17 verified integrations, including notable partners like SALTO Systems, protel, and dormakaba.
While hub OS’s broader integration network enhances its appeal for complex hotel systems, Zaplox’s fewer but focused integrations still cover essential areas like access control and PMS connectivity. Overall, hub OS edges out with more verified partners.
Edge: hub OS.
hub OS enjoys a significantly higher overall rating of 4.69/5 and a recent review count of 27, providing a robust data set. It is favored across hotel segments, with an average segment rating of 4.64/5 and a 97% likelihood to recommend.
Zaplox has only 3 recent reviews and an overall rating of 3.33/5, with mixed feedback mainly from boutique and city center hotels. Given the higher volume and more recent reviews, hub OS’s reputation is stronger and more current.
Edge: hub OS.
Pricing details for both products are not publicly available, which is typical for enterprise hotel solutions requiring custom quotes. Expect both to be priced based on hotel size, feature selection, and integration complexity.
Without transparent pricing, your evaluation should focus on value delivered relative to features, support, and existing hotel needs.
Not ideal if your focus is purely on guest mobile engagement or contactless concierge services.
Not ideal if your hotel primarily needs internal communication tools or maintenance management.
hub OS provides a comprehensive internal communication and maintenance platform, rated highly for ease of use, support, and operational impact. It excels in streamlining hotel workflows, making it ideal for properties with complex operational needs.
Zaplox offers a versatile, guest-focused mobile app that enhances contactless interactions, from check-in to room service. It is best suited for hotels aiming to boost guest safety and satisfaction through mobile technology.
If your hotel’s priority is internal operational efficiency, hub OS is the clear choice. If improving the guest experience with mobile solutions is your goal, Zaplox offers a broader feature set.
In conclusion, choosing hinges on whether your hotel needs to optimize staff workflows or elevate the guest mobile journey. Both products serve different core functions, but based on recent reviews and strong ratings, hub OS has a more established reputation.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Hub OS 在促进酒店各部门之间的沟通方面表现出色。评论强调了报告问题和在团队之间分配任务的便利性,从而促进了协调努力并改善了服务交付。此功能极大地增强了... Hub OS 在促进酒店各部门之间的沟通方面表现出色。评论强调了报告问题和在团队之间分配任务的便利性,从而促进了协调努力并改善了服务交付。此功能极大地增强了整体运营流程。
用户对 Hub OS 简化维护操作的能力表示赞赏。它提供快速报告和解决故障的功能,从而减少停机时间和运营效率低下。该软件允许团队实时跟踪和传达维护问题,从而更... 用户对 Hub OS 简化维护操作的能力表示赞赏。它提供快速报告和解决故障的功能,从而减少停机时间和运营效率低下。该软件允许团队实时跟踪和传达维护问题,从而更快地解决问题。
虽然许多用户认为 Hub OS 界面友好且外观精美,但有些人在使用过程中遇到了一些问题,例如偶尔崩溃或延迟。尽管存在这些问题,但用户仍然欣赏该软件如何简化复杂... 虽然许多用户认为 Hub OS 界面友好且外观精美,但有些人在使用过程中遇到了一些问题,例如偶尔崩溃或延迟。尽管存在这些问题,但用户仍然欣赏该软件如何简化复杂的任务。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户经常提到的一个问题是存在技术故障。这些包括同步延迟、偶尔崩溃和界面错误。虽然这些问题通常可以很快得到解决,但它们仍然会扰乱酒店运营。
Hub OS 的移动可访问性值得称赞,它使酒店员工能够随时随地管理运营。此功能对于报告问题和快速访问重要数据特别有用,从而节省时间并提高整体效率。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Hub OS Guest in Touch 和 Zaplox Premium Guest App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Hub OS Guest in Touch 提供 23 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Zaplox Premium Guest App 提供 17 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Hub OS Guest in Touch 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 3.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Hub OS Guest in Touch:否。Zaplox Premium Guest App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。hub OS 的 HT Score 为 22,Zaplox 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问