The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 31 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
GuestSpace 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Automatic Translations (Multi-Lingual) and Web-app.
Zaplox 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App.
基于 HTR 上 31 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 27 | 4 |
在分析了 31 条经验证的评价后,GuestSpace 用户最看重其 user experience, 通信功能, 宾客自助服务功能,而 Zaplox 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
User Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
通信功能
▾
|
|
|
+
宾客自助服务功能
▾
|
|
|
+
Online Check-In Automation
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
与锁具和预订系统的集成
▾
|
|
|
−
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
|
|
−
分析与报告
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | — | #34 0 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) | — | #18 4 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #26 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #22 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 | — | #20 2 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | — | #20 2 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #30 0 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #12 2 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | — | #20 2 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #17 0 条评价 |
When choosing a guest app for your hotel, the core challenge is balancing guest experience, operational efficiency, and integration capabilities. GuestSpace and Zaplox serve this purpose but diverge significantly in their approach, features, and user feedback. GuestSpace, with its no-download web app, focuses on automating the front desk and elevating self-service, while Zaplox emphasizes contactless, mobile key solutions with a broader feature set. Which aligns better with your hotel’s goals?
GuestSpace tackles automation, upselling, and remote guest management, making it ideal for hotels seeking to streamline operations. Zaplox, on the other hand, prioritizes contactless check-in, digital keys, and personalized guest engagement, suited for hotels aiming to enhance safety and convenience. Are you leaning more towards automation or contactless guest journeys?
GuestSpace’s high review count (26 recent reviews) and a 78.25 HTR Score make it the more tested and trusted product in the market. Its overall rating of 0/5 reflects a glaring issue—likely a data or reporting error—but its user ratings highlight ease of use (4.58/5), support (4.46/5), and value (4.62/5). Meanwhile, Zaplox, with only 3 reviews and a 3.33/5 overall rating, has less recent feedback and fewer data points to validate its performance.
GuestSpace offers a web-based, no-download app that automates check-in, allows for mobile payments, and includes upsell features, which many users find reduces staffing needs and enhances guest engagement. Zaplox provides a mobile app with contactless check-in, digital keys, and a digital compendium—focusing on safety and quick service, but its reviews mention integration issues and limited recent feedback. Would your hotel benefit more from automation or contactless safety?
If your hotel needs a proven, user-rated digital guest journey platform that simplifies check-in, drives revenue through upselling, and offers multi-language support, GuestSpace is the clear choice. Its cost ($600/month) and high satisfaction ratings suggest strong value for hotels prioritizing digital self-service, especially in North America and Europe.
Conversely, if your hotel values mobile key functionality, contactless check-in, and digital guest engagement—particularly in boutique or city-center segments—Zaplox’s broad feature set and focus on safety make it appealing. Its integration with a wider range of partners (17 vs 4) and emphasis on contactless protocols could better serve hotels seeking to minimize physical contact.
In summary, for automation, guest control, and higher-rated support, go with GuestSpace. For contactless, safety-driven experiences with a focus on mobile keys, choose Zaplox.
GuestSpace’s UI is rated 4.58/5, with users praising its intuitive, no-download web app that fits seamlessly into their operations. Onboarding is quick, with a 4.6/5 rating, and staff adoption is smooth, making it easy to implement and manage.
Zaplox, with a 3.33/5 usability rating, has received praise for its straightforward app display and guest-friendly features, but some reviews highlight challenges with deeper integration and multi-property presentation. Its onboarding process is rated 4/5, yet its overall usability lags behind GuestSpace’s high marks.
Edge: GuestSpace.
GuestSpace offers 10 shared features with Zaplox, including digital check-in, mobile payments, and upselling tools. Unique to GuestSpace are automatic translations for multilingual guests and a web app, making it highly customizable without requiring downloads.
Zaplox’s standout features include mobile keys, notifications, and remote check-in—five additional capabilities that enhance contactless safety and convenience. It supports features like digital compendium, chat, and personalized promotions, but lacks the multi-lingual and web app options that GuestSpace provides.
Edge: GuestSpace.
GuestSpace’s reviews consistently praise their support team, with a 4.46/5 rating, highlighting responsiveness and proactive assistance. Users mention that support helps them resolve issues quickly and that the onboarding was smooth, enabling faster deployment.
Zaplox’s customer support rating (4/5) is slightly lower, with some reviewers mentioning that while responses are quick, the product’s integration complexities sometimes delay solutions. Reviews report positive interactions but note that support could improve in handling deeper technical issues.
Edge: GuestSpace.
Zaplox boasts 17 verified partners, including major PMS and access control systems like SALTO, Oracle Hospitality, and Infor. It offers extensive integrations, which support more complex hotel ecosystems.
GuestSpace has only 4 verified partners, with notable integrations like Mews and FlexiPass, but fewer options overall. Its limited partner network might restrict some multi-system workflows, although its core features are well-supported within its ecosystem.
Edge: Zaplox.
GuestSpace’s recent reviews and overall ratings show a high likelihood to recommend (93%) and a strong user satisfaction score (HTR Score 78.25). Hotels of all sizes in North America and Europe appreciate its ease of use and support.
Zaplox, with only three reviews, shows mixed feedback. Boutique hotels and city-center properties have rated it highly, but independent hotels and those needing deeper integrations have rated it poorly (1.5/5). The recency of reviews favors GuestSpace’s credibility.
Edge: GuestSpace.
GuestSpace charges a flat $600/month fee, with no free tier or trial period, making it straightforward for budgeting. Pricing details for Zaplox are unavailable, but it is likely to be similar given the market, with no free plan and custom quotes.
GuestSpace’s transparent pricing and high value ratings suggest it’s a reliable investment, whereas Zaplox’s unknown pricing could pose budgeting uncertainties.
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on physical access control or requires advanced integration with many third-party systems.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive customization or operates in regions where Zaplox’s support is limited.
GuestSpace simplifies digital guest management with its web app, focusing on automation, upselling, and ease of use, making it suitable for hotels prioritizing efficiency and revenue growth. Zaplox emphasizes contactless, mobile key experiences that enhance safety and streamline guest interactions, ideal for properties where hygiene and minimal contact are paramount.
Choose GuestSpace if your hotel values automation, customization, and proven support. Opt for Zaplox if your priority is contactless safety, mobile keys, and a broad partner network. Your decision should reflect your property’s core needs—automation versus contactless safety.
This comprehensive comparison aims to guide your hotel in selecting the guest app that best aligns with your operational goals and guest experience standards.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,GuestSpace 和 Zaplox Premium Guest App 共享 10 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 无钥匙进入 | ||
| 白标能力 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 网络应用 | ||
| 自动翻译(多语言) | ||
| 远程签到 | ||
| 通知 |
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
The overall user experience of both guests and staff with DropIn is favorable due to its intuitive interface. This ease of use contributes to smooth a... The overall user experience of both guests and staff with DropIn is favorable due to its intuitive interface. This ease of use contributes to smooth adoption and effective utilization of its features.
DropIn 的通讯功能得到了积极的评价;然而,一些用户认为其对外通讯能力还有提升空间,以进一步增强与客人的互动。
自助服务功能让宾客对自己的住宿体验拥有更多掌控权,DropIn 平台为此提供了便利,显著提升了宾客的入住体验。用户也认为这提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
DropIn 与 Mews 等预订系统的集成及其生成电子门禁码的功能备受好评。这项功能减少了人工办理入住的需要,提高了客房出入的便捷性和安全性。
尽管总体上广受好评,但一些用户提到希望DropIn平台能提供更多自定义选项,尤其是在访客沟通和菜单设置方面。这方面的改进可以进一步提升其实用性。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。GuestSpace 和 Zaplox Premium Guest App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。GuestSpace 提供 4 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Zaplox Premium Guest App 提供 17 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。GuestSpace 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 3.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
GuestSpace:否。Zaplox Premium Guest App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。GuestSpace 的 HT Score 为 78,Zaplox 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问