The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 244 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
GuestSpace 表现出色 在 user experience 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payments and Mobile Checkin.
STAY 表现出色 在 customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App.
基于 HTR 上 244 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | From $300/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 29 | 215 |
在分析了 244 条经验证的评价后,GuestSpace 用户最看重其 user experience, 通信功能, 宾客自助服务功能,而 STAY 用户则强调 客户体验优化, 移动和用户体验, 运营效率。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
User Experience
▾
|
+
客户体验优化
▾
|
|
+
通信功能
▾
|
+
移动和用户体验
▾
|
|
+
宾客自助服务功能
▾
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
|
+
Online Check-In Automation
▾
|
+
支持和服务
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
与锁具和预订系统的集成
▾
|
−
CMS 和定制
▾
|
|
−
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
|
−
分析与报告
▾
|
−
分析和报告
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #9 10 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 83 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 89 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 24 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #2 77 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #2 88 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 91 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #6 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #5 27 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #3 112 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #6 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #7 2 条评价 |
Choosing between Drop.in Guest App by Drop.in and STAY Guest App by STAY hinges on what your hotel needs most. Both platforms aim to enhance guest experience and streamline operations, but they differ significantly in features, market presence, and review momentum. Your decision will be shaped by whether you prioritize more comprehensive features and recent user feedback (Drop.in) or broader integration options and global reach (STAY). Which product aligns better with your hotel’s current priorities?
Drop.in and STAY both serve the hotel guest app category but approach guest interaction differently. Drop.in focuses on automating the front desk with digital check-in, mobile keys, and upsell tools, targeting hotels looking to reduce operational overhead. STAY emphasizes a full guest experience platform that digitizes services from room access to dining reservations, ideal for hotels aiming for a holistic guest engagement solution.
Drop.in boasts a higher overall rating (0/5 vs. 3/5) based on recent reviews and a significantly larger number of recent reviews (26 versus 0 in the last six months). Its core strength lies in automating check-in and payments, making it ideal for tech-forward hotels seeking operational efficiency. Conversely, STAY’s broader service integrations and global hotel chain adoption make it suitable if your hotel prioritizes seamless system integration and scalability.
Given the latest data, Drop.in’s recent review activity and higher rating suggest it is the more actively validated platform. Does your hotel prefer a specialized, check-in-focused solution (Drop.in) or a broader guest experience system (STAY)?
If your hotel needs to streamline front desk operations, reduce manual tasks, and focus on contactless check-in and upselling, Drop.in is the clear choice. Its features like digital check-in, mobile keys, and in-stay payments are tailored for properties seeking operational automation and guest self-service, especially in hybrid or boutique hotels.
If your hotel prioritizes comprehensive guest engagement, with multiple services accessible via a single app, STAY is the better fit. Its strengths include a wide range of integrations, robust analytics, and a proven track record with large chains like NH Hotels and RIU, making it ideal for hotels aiming to digitize every aspect of the guest journey.
For properties focused on reducing front desk queues and increasing revenue through upselling, Drop.in’s targeted features make it the smarter pick. Conversely, if your hotel wants a broad, multi-service platform for diverse hotel operations, STAY’s extensive integration ecosystem and proven global implementation are compelling.
Drop.in scores a solid 4.58/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive guest web app, simple check-in process, and straightforward onboarding. Hotels report that staff find it easy to implement and guests quickly adapt to its digital interface. However, some mention that customizing messaging and deeper integration require improvements.
STAY edges slightly higher at 4.78/5, with reviewers emphasizing its user-friendly CMS, clear content management, and simple navigation from both staff and guest perspectives. Hotels also appreciate its quick deployment and minimal learning curve, despite some noting room for enhanced language support and faster reporting.
Edge: STAY.
Drop.in offers unique capabilities such as integrated payments and mobile check-in, features absent in STAY. Its focus on contactless check-in, digital keys, and upsell tools cater directly to operational automation, with only two features exclusive to Drop.in.
STAY provides four features not in Drop.in, including a dedicated chatbot, automated replies, message routing, and a mobile app. Its broader suite supports a more comprehensive guest experience, managing everything from service requests to reservations.
While Drop.in’s niche features suit hotels seeking operational automation, STAY’s variety caters to properties wanting a multi-service platform. The choice hinges on whether your hotel prefers specialized check-in tools or a full-service guest experience system.
Edge: STAY.
Drop.in's support and onboarding ratings are strong at 4.46/5, with many users appreciating prompt assistance and clear communication. However, some reviews mention the need for faster support response times and more in-depth customization support.
STAY’s customer support scores slightly higher at 4.83/5, with reviews highlighting responsive, helpful service, and effective onboarding. Clients frequently mention that the support team is knowledgeable and proactive, though some express wish for expanded support hours and more direct communication channels.
Edge: STAY.
STAY’s platform boasts 20 verified integrations, significantly more than Drop.in’s four. Key shared integrations include Mews, but STAY also connects with hotelkit, SiteMinder, Oracle Hospitality, and many others, enabling hotels to unify various systems efficiently.
Drop.in’s integrations are limited mainly to core reservation and access systems like Goki and Stayntouch, plus a few niche partners. If your hotel relies on multiple connected systems, STAY’s wider integration network offers more flexibility and scalability.
Edge: STAY.
Drop.in’s recent reviews, with 26 in the last six months, reflect a high likelihood to recommend at 93%. Its current HT Score of approximately 78 underscores strong satisfaction among hotels seeking automation.
STAY, with over 200 reviews and a higher recent rating, has a slightly higher likelihood to recommend at 96%. Large hotel groups like NH Hotels and RIU rate STAY highly for its comprehensive services and integration capabilities, especially in the luxury and chain hotel segments.
Given the volume and recency, STAY’s broader positive feedback makes it the more trusted choice at this moment.
Edge: STAY.
Drop.in charges a flat base price of $600 per month, with no trial, freemium, or per-room fees. Its pricing reflects a focus on automated check-in, payments, and upsell features, targeting hotels willing to invest in operational automation.
STAY’s pricing starts at $300 per month, also without trial or per-room fees. Its lower base cost coupled with extensive integrations and features makes it attractive for hotels seeking a scalable guest experience platform without a hefty upfront investment.
If budget is a primary concern, STAY offers a more affordable entry point, though Drop.in’s specialized features justify its higher price for automation-focused hotels.
Drop.in is ideal for:
Not ideal if:
Drop.in excels where automation and operational reduction are priorities—perfect for properties with a tech-forward approach.
STAY suits:
Not ideal if:
STAY is the choice for hotels committed to broad digital engagement, operational insights, and global scalability.
Drop.in and STAY address different hotel needs but share the goal of elevating guest experiences. Drop.in’s specialty in automating check-ins and reducing operational overhead makes it suitable for hotels prioritizing efficiency, especially in boutique or hybrid properties. STAY, with its extensive integrations and broad service offerings, is better positioned for large chains or hotels seeking to digitize their entire guest journey.
Choose Drop.in if your hotel needs a straightforward, automated check-in process that boosts revenue through upselling. Opt for STAY if your property aims to deliver a comprehensive digital guest experience, improve operational workflows, and scale globally.
In conclusion, if recent reviews and higher engagement matter most, STAY’s current momentum makes it the more proven choice. However, for targeted automation and guest self-service, Drop.in remains a strong contender.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $300/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,GuestSpace 和 STAY Guest App 共享 10 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 付款 | ||
| 手机值机 | ||
| 消息路由 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 聊天机器人 | ||
| 自动回复 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
The overall user experience of both guests and staff with DropIn is favorable due to its intuitive interface. This ease of use contributes to smooth a... The overall user experience of both guests and staff with DropIn is favorable due to its intuitive interface. This ease of use contributes to smooth adoption and effective utilization of its features.
DropIn 的通讯功能得到了积极的评价;然而,一些用户认为其对外通讯能力还有提升空间,以进一步增强与客人的互动。
自助服务功能让宾客对自己的住宿体验拥有更多掌控权,DropIn 平台为此提供了便利,显著提升了宾客的入住体验。用户也认为这提高了运营效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
DropIn 与 Mews 等预订系统的集成及其生成电子门禁码的功能备受好评。这项功能减少了人工办理入住的需要,提高了客房出入的便捷性和安全性。
尽管总体上广受好评,但一些用户提到希望DropIn平台能提供更多自定义选项,尤其是在访客沟通和菜单设置方面。这方面的改进可以进一步提升其实用性。
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便... 多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便利。
该应用的用户界面和移动体验因其直观和易于操作而广受好评。无论是酒店员工还是客人,用户都发现更新信息和管理内容非常简单。
STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现... STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现可持续发展目标。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
CMS 的亮点在于它的易用性和定制功能,但用户也指出了一些需要改进的地方,特别是在设计和功能方面的灵活性。
用户对 STAY 与各种内部应用程序和系统(包括 PMS 和 CRM 系统)的强大集成功能表示赞赏。这些集成简化了数据管理,并有助于为员工和客人提供无缝体验。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。GuestSpace 和 STAY Guest App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。GuestSpace 提供 4 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 STAY Guest App 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。STAY Guest App 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
GuestSpace:否。STAY Guest App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。GuestSpace 的 HT Score 为 79,STAY 的为 47。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案