The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 887 条经验证的评价后,Hogatex 用户最看重其 ,而 Mews 用户则强调 ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| Hogatex |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
入职和支持
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Hogatex |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 329 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 397 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 45 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 49 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Hogatex |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #1 483 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #5 220 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #2 170 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #1 130 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Hogatex |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #8 106 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #1 660 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #10 17 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #28 8 条评价 |
Choosing between Hogatex PMS by Hogatex and Mews PMS by Mews hinges on your hotel's specific needs, operational scale, and growth ambitions. Both aim to streamline property management, but Hogatex offers a nearly nonexistent online presence and zero reviews, indicating it might not be a viable option for modern hoteliers. Mews, on the other hand, has over 750 reviews in the past six months alone, with an impressive 4.62 out of 5 rating and a 93% likelihood to recommend—making it the more reliable choice for hoteliers seeking proven, current technology.
If your priority is a system backed by active user feedback and ongoing innovation, Mews clearly leads. Hogatex’s lack of recent reviews and zero ratings suggest it’s either nascent or inactive, raising doubts about its support and future development. Are you comfortable navigating an untested system, or do you prefer a platform with extensive community validation?
Hogatex presents as a property management solution, but with no available reviews or recent activity, it's difficult to gauge its effectiveness or user satisfaction. Mews, by contrast, boasts 758 reviews, with 98 in the last six months, emphasizing its active development and customer engagement—factors critical for today’s hotel operators. The stark difference suggests Mews is the safer, more tested option, especially for hotels seeking modern, scalable management.
Hogatex’s absence of a review base means you lack insight into real-world performance, support quality, or feature reliability. Meanwhile, Mews’s high review count and recent feedback highlight a well-established platform trusted by thousands of hotels worldwide. Which would you rather rely on for your hotel’s future?
Mews scores 4.7 out of 5 for ease of use, with a notable 4.27 for customer support, reflecting a user-friendly interface and reliable onboarding. Hogatex, with a rating of zero, offers no data to support its ease of use or staff adoption—raising questions about implementation clarity.
Most Mews users praise the platform’s intuitive design, quick setup, and minimal training requirements, citing the onboarding process as smooth and staff adoption high. Hogatex’s lack of review data suggests it may lack the user-focused design needed for efficient adoption. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers an extensive suite with 59 features, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, revenue management, guest CRM, online booking engine, integrated channel manager, mobile apps, and advanced reporting—features crucial for modern hotel management. Hogatex provides none of these, indicating a likely limited or non-existent feature set.
The depth and breadth of Mews’s features enable it to serve diverse hotel types, from boutique to large chains, with capabilities that support revenue growth and operational control. Hogatex’s minimal feature offering suggests it’s either very early-stage or not designed for comprehensive hotel management. The clear edge goes to Mews.
Mews scores 4.27 out of 5 for customer support, with reviews highlighting quick, helpful responses and proactive onboarding. Hogatex has no reviews or support ratings available, making it impossible to assess its support quality, responsiveness, or user satisfaction.
In the hospitality industry, reliable support is vital for smooth operations and quick resolution of issues. Mews’s active support team and positive reviews demonstrate its commitment, whereas Hogatex’s silence indicates a potential risk. Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with 336 verified partners, including industry-leading channel managers, payment providers, and revenue tools, offering a flexible, connected tech ecosystem. Hogatex, with zero verified partnerships, likely has limited or no integrations, restricting its utility in a multi-channel environment.
The extensive integrations of Mews allow hotels to customize their tech stack, automate workflows, and optimize revenue. Hogatex’s lack of integrations suggests it’s not built for the interconnected, modern hospitality landscape. Edge: Mews.
With over 750 recent reviews and a 4.62/5 rating, Mews is clearly favored by hoteliers across various segments, from boutique hotels to large chains. Hogatex, with no reviews or ratings, cannot be rated, indicating no proven user satisfaction.
Hotels that have adopted Mews often praise its ease of use, support, and feature set, boosting confidence in its reliability and scalability. Hogatex’s lack of feedback means hoteliers must rely on assumptions rather than proven performance. Edge: Mews.
Hogatex pricing is unavailable, which raises concerns about transparency and potential costs. Mews charges a $900 monthly fee, with no implementation or hidden fees, providing clarity upfront.
While Mews’s cost may seem significant, its comprehensive features and active support justify the investment, especially considering the ROI and efficiency gains reported. Hogatex’s price is unknown, making it difficult to evaluate value. Edge: Mews.
Given Hogatex’s limited feature set and no active reviews, it’s best suited for properties with minimal management complexity or those willing to develop their own solution.
Mews excels across multiple segments, from luxury to budget, and is suited for properties aiming to modernize and grow.
Mews is a well-established, feature-rich platform trusted by thousands of hotels globally, with active development and support evidenced by recent reviews. Hogatex, with no reviews or recent activity, is unlikely to meet the needs of modern hoteliers or support growth.
If your hotel values a proven, highly-rated system that integrates seamlessly and offers ongoing innovation, Mews is the clear choice. Hogatex’s limited data and feature set suggest it’s not suitable for hotels looking to scale or improve operational efficiency.
Choose Mews if you want a reliable, customizable platform with proven support and community trust. Opt for Hogatex only if your hotel has very specific, minimal needs and you’re prepared to manage its limitations without the backing of a vibrant user base or active development.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
虽然 Mews 提供了可靠的报表和分析功能,但一些评论指出,它需要更多可定制和灵活的报表功能。用户希望获得更细致的数据洞察,尤其是在预订和收入分析方面。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Hogatex PMS 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Hogatex PMS 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 336 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Hogatex PMS:否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Hogatex 的 HT Score 为 0,Mews 的为 99。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问