The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 25 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Hop Software 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest App.
Noovy 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader and Housekeeping Mobile App.
基于 HTR 上 25 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 25 |
在分析了 25 条经验证的评价后,Hop Software 用户最看重其 ,而 Noovy 用户则强调 易于使用, 客户服务, 自动付款处理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
自动付款处理
▾
|
|
|
+
直接 OTA 集成
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
设计
▾
|
|
|
−
报告工具
▾
|
|
|
−
翻译问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #39 11 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #38 12 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #38 14 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | — | #54 2 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #52 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #22 23 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #16 2 条评价 |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your hotel needs a solution that improves operations, enhances guest experiences, and offers reliable support. Both Hop PMS by Hop Software and Noovy PMS aim to streamline hotel management, but they differ significantly in features, market presence, and user feedback. Hop PMS is a lesser-known product with no recent reviews, while Noovy boasts a growing user base, glowing recent reviews, and a high NPS score. Given the data, Noovy clearly emerges as the more trustworthy and mature choice.
Are you seeking a PMS with proven recent performance, extensive integrations, and high customer satisfaction? Or are you considering a less established solution with limited feedback? The comparison here should help clarify which fits your hotel’s needs better.
Hop PMS offers an all-in-one management system designed to reduce expenses, increase direct bookings, and simplify operations. However, it has no recent reviews, a zero-star overall rating, and no recent user feedback, making its effectiveness uncertain.
In contrast, Noovy boasts a 5-star overall rating based on 19 recent reviews and nearly 20 years of market presence. Its users praise its ease of use, reliable support, and broad feature set, making it a safer, more tested choice for hotels seeking stability and proven performance.
Given the absence of recent data on Hop PMS and Noovy’s strong recent reviews, the latter is clearly the more credible option. Do you want to trust a product with recent, high-volume feedback, or gamble on an unreviewed system?
If your hotel needs an intuitive, well-supported system with extensive integrations and a modern interface, Noovy is the clear choice. It’s especially suitable for boutique hotels, city center properties, and independent hotels that prioritize ease of use, reliable customer service, and automation.
If your hotel is considering a less established platform with fewer features—perhaps for a very specific niche or a pilot project—Hop PMS might seem appealing, but its lack of recent reviews and unclear effectiveness make it a risky choice. Overall, Noovy’s strong user satisfaction and comprehensive feature set make it the preferable option for most hotels today.
Noovy scores a near-perfect 4.84/5 in ease of use, based on recent reviews praising its user-friendly interface and straightforward onboarding process. Users mention that “it’s very easy to connect with OTAs, and bookings take just a few clicks,” emphasizing its simplicity.
Hop PMS, however, has a 0/5 score for ease of use and no recent reviews to support claims of usability. Given the lack of recent feedback, its usability remains unverified and likely inferior.
Edge: Noovy.
Noovy offers 20 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-lingual support, digital registration, integrated payment terminals, housekeeping mobile apps, real-time status updates, drag-and-drop tape charts, rate management, rules-based room assignments, and compliance with PCI and GDPR standards. These features support automation and efficiency, especially for mid-sized to larger hotels.
Hop PMS has only 3 features unique to its system: EPoS, gift vouchers, and guest app, which are less comprehensive. It shares 28 features with Noovy, but the limited unique functionalities suggest it may not meet the needs of hotels seeking advanced automation.
Edge: Noovy.
Noovy consistently receives high praise for support, with a 4.89/5 customer support rating and reviews describing their team as “fast, friendly, and reliable.” Recent user feedback highlights “excellent support,” with quick responses and helpful onboarding.
Hop PMS, by contrast, has no recent reviews, so support quality remains unverified. Given the importance of ongoing assistance, Noovy’s solid support rating is a decisive advantage.
Edge: Noovy.
Noovy has 40 verified partners, including major OTAs and revenue management tools, with three shared integrations with Hop PMS. Its extensive ecosystem includes many third-party tools such as Omnibees, RevControl, and Revinate, providing flexibility for hotels with complex needs.
Hop PMS offers only 7 verified integrations, limiting its capability to connect with other hotel systems. For hotels that rely on a broad array of integrations, Noovy’s larger partner network is a clear plus.
Edge: Noovy.
Noovy’s recent reviews show a 9.89/5 NPS score, with 99% likelihood of recommendation, indicating strong user satisfaction. Hotels across various segments, including boutique and city hotels, praise its ease of use, automation, and support, with some calling it “the most complete PMS on the market.”
Hop PMS has no recent reviews or ratings, so its user satisfaction remains unknown. Given the clear positive recent feedback for Noovy, it’s the higher-rated option.
Edge: Noovy.
Hop PMS does not publicly disclose pricing, with no trial or flat-rate options available, leaving potential buyers in the dark about costs. Its unclear pricing structure makes budgeting difficult.
Noovy charges a straightforward €5 per room per month, with no setup fees or hidden costs, providing transparency and affordability. Its predictable pricing model appeals to hotels seeking clear, manageable expenses.
Edge: Noovy.
Given Hop PMS's limited features and lack of recent feedback, it’s better suited for very small, straightforward operations or experimental projects.
Noovy's broad feature set and positive reviews make it suitable for a wide range of hotels seeking efficiency and growth.
The core difference lies in their market maturity, feature breadth, and user feedback. Noovy has a proven track record with recent, positive reviews, while Hop PMS remains largely unreviewed and unverified in recent performance.
If your hotel values stability, extensive automation, and high user satisfaction, Noovy is the clear winner. It offers more features, better support, and proven results, making it the safer investment.
Choose Noovy if you want a reliable, feature-rich system with a strong support network. Hop PMS might be suitable only for very small or experimental setups that do not require advanced automation or recent user validation, but it’s not recommended for most hotels seeking growth and efficiency today.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Hop PMS 和 Noovy PMS 共享 28 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 11 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多评论称赞该系统的易用性,指出其用户友好的设计和直观的界面可以快速培训新员工并减少操作错误。
优质的客户服务经常被提及,用户欣赏快速的响应和有效的解决方案,这有助于对产品的整体满意度。
该系统支持自动付款请求和处理,大大简化了计费流程并降低了错误率。此功能还因其在处理不可退款预订方面的效率而受到好评。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户很欣赏该软件的功能,但注意到其设计略显过时,但预计重新设计将解决这个问题。
该软件提供强大的报告工具,可以深入了解酒店运营的各个方面,帮助做出更好的管理决策。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Hop PMS 和 Noovy PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Hop PMS 提供 7 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Noovy PMS 提供 40 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Noovy PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Hop PMS:否。Noovy PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Hop Software 的 HT Score 为 0,Noovy 的为 71。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案