项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 25 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Noovy 在易于使用方面表现出色,尤其适合市中心住宿设施(5.0/5),并拥有交付过程以及管家模块等独家功能。
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #41 9 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #36 14 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #39 14 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | — | #56 2 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | — | #54 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #24 23 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #15 2 条评价 |
Hotello PMS (Acquired by Mews) and Noovy PMS both target property management but diverge sharply in market presence and feature depth. Hotello, established in 2001 with 500 employees, focuses on reliability and adaptability across varied hospitality types but lacks verified user ratings and reviews. Noovy, founded in 2017 with 37 employees, serves primarily smaller independent hotels with a strong suite of integrated tools and 25 reviews averaging 5/5 overall. For hotels seeking a mature platform with an established footprint in North America and Europe but limited public feedback, Hotello might be considered. In contrast, Noovy fits properties wanting an all-in-one cloud PMS with direct OTA integrations and automated payment processing, validated by hoteliers. Both systems solve the core problem of simplifying front desk operations and bookings but differ in maturity and operational scope.
If you operate a small to medium boutique or city center hotel in Europe or North America and prioritize a proven cloud PMS with extensive integrations, Noovy’s 41 verified partners and 25 glowing reviews averaging 5/5 suggest it will deliver reliable performance and modern features. Noovy’s user base includes 32% boutique hotels and 36% city center hotels, with segment ratings consistently high, e.g., 5/5 from 17 city center hotel reviews. However, if you run a larger or diverse property and value a PMS with a longer market presence and a broader employee base, Hotello’s 20-year history and 500 employees may appeal despite the absence of public user ratings. That said, Hotello’s lack of recent reviews and missing feature data limits confidence in its current competitiveness. There is insufficient data for budget or branded hotels on Hotello, making Noovy the safer choice for those segments.
Noovy scores 4.9/5 in ease of use and 4.7/5 in onboarding across 25 reviews, with users praising its intuitive interface, rapid staff training, and fast adoption. Reviewers highlight features like few clicks to make a reservation and simple online check-in/out workflows that reduce front desk workload. Hotello has no public ratings for ease of use or onboarding, so comparison relies on vendor claims alone. Noovy’s user feedback confirms ease of use benefits operationally through fewer errors and faster service, whereas Hotello’s claims of design elegance and simplicity remain unverified by users. Given this, the evidence supports that Noovy’s adoption curve is proven, while Hotello’s ease of use is unsubstantiated. Edge: Even.
Noovy offers 48 hotel-specific features not found in Hotello, including a channel manager, integrated CRS, payment processing, booking engine, housekeeping mobile app, native email marketing, automated night audit, and revenue management module. These features change hotel operations by automating reservations across OTAs, simplifying payment workflows with integrated Stripe processing, enabling online check-in, and providing real-time housekeeping status updates via mobile devices. Hotello lists no unique features on record and shares no feature overlap with Noovy, indicating a significant functional gap. Noovy’s integrated guest CRM and centralized messaging improve guest communication, reducing manual front desk tasks. The absence of any unique Hotello features in the comparison indicates Noovy’s clear advantage in operational capabilities. Edge: Noovy PMS.
Noovy rates 4.9/5 on customer support and 4.7/5 in onboarding, with reviewers frequently citing fast, friendly, and reliable service that resolves issues promptly. Users report satisfaction with 24/7 phone and chat support and a smooth onboarding experience that minimizes startup delays. Hotello has no published user ratings or reviews to evaluate support quality, leaving its customer service performance unknown in practice. Without verified feedback, claims of Hotello’s customer service cannot be weighed against Noovy’s proven record of high satisfaction. Consequently, the assessment must treat support quality as effectively unproven for Hotello, while Noovy’s support reputation is well established. Edge: Even.
Noovy supports 41 verified integrations compared to Hotello’s 16. Both share 2 integrations: INTELITY and Easyway, common for guest experience and payment facilitation. Hotello’s unique partners include STR, TrustYou, and Onity, which may appeal to hotels requiring in-depth benchmarking and in-room technology. Noovy’s exclusive partners include SiteMinder, Customer Alliance, and Bookassist, enhancing its direct OTA connectivity, reputation management, and booking engine capabilities. Hotels needing extensive channel management and modern guest feedback tools benefit more from Noovy’s broader ecosystem. Hotello’s integration portfolio suits properties aligned with legacy systems or specialized partners but is less extensive. Edge: Noovy PMS.
Noovy holds a perfect 5/5 overall rating from 25 reviews, with no recent reviews but stable historical satisfaction. Segment ratings are uniformly high: 5/5 from 17 city center hotel reviews, 14 boutique hotel reviews, and 10 airport/conference hotel reviews, indicating consistent approval across diverse independent properties. Hotello has zero reviews, resulting in no rating data and a 0 HT Score. This lack of ratings means Hotello’s user satisfaction is unknown, while Noovy’s scores reflect current and consistent user happiness. The evidence clearly favors Noovy as the higher-rated option by hoteliers in multiple segments. Edge: Even.
Hotello does not publish any pricing information, offering no insight into base price, per-room fees, or implementation costs. Noovy charges a base price of $600 with no per-room or monthly flat fees and no implementation fee disclosed. Noovy’s pricing model is transparent, supporting budgeting decisions upfront. Hotello’s lack of pricing transparency complicates direct cost comparison and financial planning. Consequently, only Noovy provides a clear, straightforward pricing structure.
The core difference between Hotello PMS and Noovy PMS lies in functional maturity and market validation. Hotello offers a long-standing cloud PMS platform with a design focus on reliability and adaptability but lacks publicly available user ratings, verified features, and pricing transparency. Noovy delivers a fully integrated, modern PMS with extensive hotel-specific features, broad integrations, and strong user endorsement across multiple segments.
Choose Hotello PMS if your property values a legacy system with an established team and you are comfortable making decisions without user reviews or detailed feature disclosures. Its human-centric approach may suit hotels prioritizing guest relations and operational simplicity, but the lack of verified data is a risk.
Choose Noovy PMS if your hotel demands an all-in-one system combining PMS, channel manager, and booking engine with automated payments and guest communication. Noovy’s 25 reviews averaging 5/5 and 41 integrations provide confidence in operational reliability, ease of use, and support. This is the stronger choice for independent boutique and city center hotels seeking proven technology that reduces manual work and boosts revenue management.
The data decisively favors Noovy PMS for most independent and boutique hotels requiring a comprehensive, user-validated PMS solution with transparent pricing and timely support. Hotello’s offering remains unproven in the marketplace and should be approached cautiously unless your property has specific needs aligned with its undocumented capabilities.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
许多评论称赞该系统的易用性,指出其用户友好的设计和直观的界面可以快速培训新员工并减少操作错误。
优质的客户服务经常被提及,用户欣赏快速的响应和有效的解决方案,这有助于对产品的整体满意度。
该系统支持自动付款请求和处理,大大简化了计费流程并降低了错误率。此功能还因其在处理不可退款预订方面的效率而受到好评。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
用户很欣赏该软件的功能,但注意到其设计略显过时,但预计重新设计将解决这个问题。
该软件提供强大的报告工具,可以深入了解酒店运营的各个方面,帮助做出更好的管理决策。
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。Hotello PMS (Acquired by Mews) 和 Noovy PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Hotello PMS (Acquired by Mews) 提供 16 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Noovy PMS 提供 41 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
Hotello PMS (Acquired by Mews):否。Noovy PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Hotello 的 HT Score 为 0,Noovy 的为 76。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐