项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #5 224 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #3 238 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #3 51 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #8 7 条评价 | — |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #4 248 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #3 246 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 145 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #4 49 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #52 4 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #2 384 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #5 117 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #1 21 条评价 | — |
HotelTime PMS and Luopan Arcas PMS both aim to centralize hotel operations on cloud platforms, but their target users and maturity differ markedly. HotelTime serves more than 650 properties in 25+ countries, with a user base spanning resorts, boutique hotels, and branded chains. Luopan, by contrast, positions itself for mid-sized to large hotels and multi-property groups but lacks published user data or reviews.
Both platforms consolidate reservations, front desk, housekeeping, and guest management to reduce manual work and improve operational control. However, HotelTime's extensive verified integrations and strong review presence confirm its operational reliability and market adoption. Luopan promises a unified ecosystem with mobile-first tools but offers no verified partner integrations or user feedback to validate performance today.
If you manage a resort, boutique, or branded city-center hotel with up to several hundred rooms in Europe, Asia Pacific, or the Middle East, HotelTime is the proven choice. Its 4.6/5 rating across 565 reviews, including 33 in the last six months at 4.4/5, reflects current satisfaction in these segments. HotelTime’s integrations with POS and channel managers support hotels needing sophisticated revenue management and operational automation.
If you operate a mid-sized or large hotel group seeking a mobile-first platform with in-built guest engagement and multi-property management, Luopan’s product description fits this profile. However, no user reviews or verified integrations exist to confirm its usability or support quality. For properties requiring guaranteed operational stability and vendor responsiveness, Luopan’s limited market presence and lack of evidence represent significant risks.
HotelTime’s ease of use rating is 4.7/5 from 565 reviews, and its onboarding scores 4.6/5, indicating that users find it accessible and learnable. Reviewers cite fast support and an intuitive interface that reduces front desk workload, although some mention complexity in module setup and occasional cumbersome workflows during peak times. Luopan provides no user reviews or ratings, leaving its ease of use unverified in live hotel operations.
Without comparative data, the edge for ease of use remains neutral. HotelTime’s extensive user feedback evidences a generally positive user experience tempered by realistic operational challenges. Luopan’s unproven usability means no operational workflows can be confidently assessed.
Edge: Even.
HotelTime offers 53 total features, including Guest CRM, guest profiles, and a drag-and-drop tapechart for room management, which improve guest data handling and front desk workflow efficiency. These features enable staff to quickly find guest histories, customize guest interactions, and visually manage room inventory to reduce booking errors.
Luopan provides 54 features, adding on-premise deployment, SMS guest communication, a guest app, and guest messaging tools not found in HotelTime. These mobile and guest engagement features modernize the guest experience, allowing direct digital interactions and self-service options that can reduce front desk staff workload and support remote operations.
The presence of guest CRM and drag-and-drop tapechart in HotelTime helps streamline front desk and guest management workflows, while Luopan’s guest messaging and mobile app target guest engagement and operational mobility. Given the operational impact on staff workflows and guest experience, each product offers unique features with meaningful effects.
Edge: Even.
HotelTime has a 4.7/5 customer support rating from 565 reviews and 4.6/5 onboarding, supported by 33 recent reviews maintaining a 4.4/5 rating. Reviewers frequently praise HotelTime’s support for responsiveness, professionalism, and ability to solve issues quickly, directly reducing downtime in front desk and accounting workflows. Some negative reviews mention language barriers and slow resolution on rare occasions.
Luopan has no published reviews or ratings for customer support or onboarding, so no reliable comparison can be made. The lack of user feedback means support quality is unproven.
Given HotelTime’s strong, consistent support ratings and Luopan’s absence of data, customer support is verifiably better for HotelTime. However, the rating gap does not meet the 0.3 threshold for a declared edge.
Edge: Even.
HotelTime integrates with 60 verified partners, including Profitroom, Bookboost, RevControl, Lybra Tech, For-Sight, Customer Alliance, STR, Umi Digital, Quinta, and Net Affinity/Smarthotel. These integrations cover channel management, revenue management, customer feedback, and business intelligence, critical for hotels prioritizing operational automation and data-driven decision-making.
Luopan has no verified integrations listed, indicating limited third-party connectivity or immature partnership development. For hotels requiring extensive connectivity to POS, channel managers, payment gateways, or analytics tools, HotelTime’s integration ecosystem significantly reduces manual reconciliation and operational silos.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime’s overall rating stands at 4.6/5 from 565 reviews, with recent reviews slightly lower at 4.4/5 but still strong. Ratings are consistent across hotel segments: 4.7/5 at Bed & Breakfasts (200 reviews), 4.7/5 at Branded Hotels (150 reviews), 4.7/5 at City Center Hotels (190 reviews), and 4.6/5 at Resorts (230 reviews). This breadth shows reliable performance in various operational contexts.
Luopan has no published ratings or review volume. Without user feedback, there is no basis for a rating comparison. HotelTime’s volume and recency make it a proven product today, whereas Luopan’s unknown user satisfaction is a risk.
Edge: HotelTime PMS.
HotelTime publishes a base price of $600. No freemium, monthly per-room, or flat monthly pricing models are disclosed, nor are implementation fees or trials available. This transparent base price allows hotels to budget upfront for acquisition but requires direct follow-up for total cost of ownership.
Luopan does not publish any pricing information. Potential buyers must contact the vendor for quotes, adding uncertainty and complicating initial budget planning.
Price transparency favors HotelTime PMS.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
HotelTime PMS and Luopan Arcas PMS both target cloud-based hotel management but diverge sharply in market presence, operational maturity, and evidence of performance. HotelTime’s extensive user base, verified integrations, and detailed reviews show a system tested across multiple hotel types and geographies. Luopan promises innovative mobile and guest engagement features for larger groups but lacks public validation.
Choose HotelTime PMS if you want a stable cloud PMS with broad functionality, strong third-party integrations, and a proven track record in boutique, branded, and resort hotels. Its guest CRM, drag-and-drop tapechart, and robust support make it suitable for properties prioritizing operational efficiency and data-driven management.
Choose Luopan Arcas PMS if your hotel group values a unified ecosystem with mobile-first tools and built-in guest communication, and you are willing to pilot a less proven platform. The inclusion of on-premise deployment and integrated guest apps offers flexibility for modern guest experiences but comes with uncertainty due to limited user feedback and integrations.
HotelTime’s strength is its operational reliability proven by 565 reviews and 60 integrations, while Luopan’s advantage lies in its mobile and guest engagement capabilities not present in HotelTime. The decision hinges on your hotel’s risk tolerance and technology priorities.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
评论中的一个共同主题是,HotelTime通过简洁直观的工作流程,减少了前台、收银和多部门操作的日常工作量。即使用户整体评价系统,也有人指出,过多的点击、弹窗... 评论中的一个共同主题是,HotelTime通过简洁直观的工作流程,减少了前台、收银和多部门操作的日常工作量。即使用户整体评价系统,也有人指出,过多的点击、弹窗或繁琐的编辑流程可能会拖慢员工速度,使培训或高峰期操作变得比必要的更困难。
用户经常提到HotelTime的支持团队是其主要优势,描述为响应迅速、联系方便、专业,且常能立即解决问题。多篇评论表示,这种响应速度减少了停机时间,使PMS在日常... 用户经常提到HotelTime的支持团队是其主要优势,描述为响应迅速、联系方便、专业,且常能立即解决问题。多篇评论表示,这种响应速度减少了停机时间,使PMS在日常运营中更易依赖,尤其是在前台或财务工作中酒店需要快速答复时。
评测者一致认为 HotelTime 在预订创建、编辑、房间可用性和房间块管理方面操作简便、速度快。该 PMS 被视为一款提升预订准确性、支持团队预订、帮助员工实时管理... 评测者一致认为 HotelTime 在预订创建、编辑、房间可用性和房间块管理方面操作简便、速度快。该 PMS 被视为一款提升预订准确性、支持团队预订、帮助员工实时管理入住率的工具,从而减少错误并加快前台工作流程。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
许多评价强调HotelTime的账单和开票流程是其实际优势,特别是在预付款单、发票、单据匹配和收银工作方面。然而,用户也指出在发票编辑、过账日记账、拆分账单、... 许多评价强调HotelTime的账单和开票流程是其实际优势,特别是在预付款单、发票、单据匹配和收银工作方面。然而,用户也指出在发票编辑、过账日记账、拆分账单、押金、货币处理和会计对账方面存在一些摩擦,表明这是一个价值很高但流程复杂的环节。
一小部分但重要的评论涉及客人档案的处理,包括偏好存储、重复档案、客人历史和与文件关联的数据。用户希望拥有更丰富的客人档案,以及更清晰的合并或搜索操作,... 一小部分但重要的评论涉及客人档案的处理,包括偏好存储、重复档案、客人历史和与文件关联的数据。用户希望拥有更丰富的客人档案,以及更清晰的合并或搜索操作,以便员工能更快地为回头客提供服务,而无需创建重复记录或进行额外的手动清理。
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。HotelTime PMS 和 Luopan Arcas PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。HotelTime PMS 提供 60 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Luopan Arcas PMS 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
HotelTime PMS:否。Luopan Arcas PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。HOTELTIME 的 HT Score 为 92,Luopan 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐