The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 105 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Infor 表现出色 在 易于使用 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles.
Maestro PMS 表现出色 在 customer support and ROI 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (3.8/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) and Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader.
基于 HTR 上 105 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 47 | 58 |
在分析了 105 条经验证的评价后,Infor 用户最看重其 易于使用, 报告, 一体化,而 Maestro PMS 用户则强调 客户支持, 报告灵活性, 可定制的功能。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
+
报告
▾
|
+
报告灵活性
▾
|
|
+
一体化
▾
|
+
可定制的功能
▾
|
|
+
家政模块
▾
|
+
培训和文档
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
支持
▾
|
−
用户界面
▾
|
|
−
易于使用
▾
|
−
安全功能
▾
|
|
−
更新问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #44 8 条评价 | #41 7 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #25 24 条评价 | #18 35 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #19 9 条评价 | #12 11 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #24 2 条评价 | #10 4 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #28 24 条评价 | #25 26 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #23 26 条评价 | #20 31 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #29 8 条评价 | #38 5 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #31 6 条评价 | #38 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #22 20 条评价 | #12 53 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #24 17 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #28 1 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) for your hotel hinges on balancing features, usability, support, and cost. Infor HMS and Maestro PMS both address core operational needs but diverge significantly in review volume, recent feedback, and feature depth. Your decision should weigh whether you prioritize extensive recent reviews or a broader feature set with proven support.
Both systems aim to streamline operations—from reservations to billing—yet their approach and maturity differ. Do you prefer a solution with a larger, more current customer base or one that offers deeper customization? Understanding these nuances helps clarify which product aligns better with your hotel's needs.
Are you looking for a system that offers robust integrations and modern tools or one that prioritizes flexibility and comprehensive modules? The choice may hinge on your hotel’s size, segment, and operational complexity—so let’s compare Infor HMS and Maestro PMS in detail.
Both Infor HMS and Maestro PMS are designed to optimize hotel operations and enhance guest experiences, yet they approach these goals differently. Infor HMS is a cloud-based platform built for scalability and customization, praised for its integration capabilities and consistent updates. However, its review count (46) and recent review activity (none in the last 6 months) suggest less current user feedback.
Maestro PMS, with 56 reviews and recent feedback, stands out for its flexibility and broad module offering. It supports a variety of hotel types, especially resorts and boutique properties, and emphasizes multi-property management. Yet, it’s often described as less modern in UI and less intuitive for new staff, reflecting its older interface design.
Both systems address reservations, billing, and housekeeping, but Infor’s cloud architecture offers more mobility, while Maestro’s extensive modules cater to diverse property needs. Are you seeking a solution that emphasizes cloud scalability and integration or one that offers a wider array of modules and customization?
If your hotel requires a cloud-native PMS with strong integration with booking channels and customizable reporting, Infor HMS is a solid choice. It appeals to properties that value automation, flexibility, and a scalable platform, especially if they can manage occasional bugs or update disruptions.
Conversely, if your property benefits from a comprehensive, multi-module system that supports a wide range of operational functions—like spa, POS, digital registration, and guest messaging—Maestro PMS is better suited. Its support for multiple property types and recent positive reviews make it ideal for resorts and boutique hotels seeking tailored modules.
Hotels that prioritize modern, cloud-based solutions with a focus on seamless integrations and automation should lean toward Infor. For properties needing an all-in-one, highly customizable system with strong support, Maestro PMS is the better fit.
Infor HMS has a reputation for being generally straightforward once users understand its format, with a user rating of 3.88/5 and positive comments about easy navigation. However, frequent bugs during updates and server downtimes can hamper staff efficiency, impacting overall user experience.
Maestro PMS scores slightly higher at 4.04/5, with recent reviews praising its intuitive interface and support during onboarding. Users note that despite its somewhat dated UI, the system’s modularity and support make day-to-day operations smoother once familiar.
Edge: Maestro PMS.
Infor HMS offers 19 shared features plus one unique feature—guest profiles—focusing on reservations, rate management, and customizable reporting. Its core strengths lie in automation, integration, and cloud mobility, but it lacks many specialized modules.
Maestro PMS boasts over 39 features exclusive to its platform, including spa & wellness modules, channel management, EPoS, online booking, guest messaging, and digital check-in. Its broad feature set supports a diverse range of hotel needs, especially for resorts and multi-property groups.
In terms of feature depth and variety, Maestro PMS clearly leads. Edge: Maestro PMS.
Support ratings favor Maestro PMS significantly, with a score of 4.78/5 compared to Infor’s 4.04/5. According to reviews, Maestro support is consistently quick, helpful, and available 24/7, often resolving issues on the first call.
Infor’s support is praised for professionalism but is less frequently mentioned, and some users report delays or bugs during maintenance. Support quality can impact your ability to troubleshoot operational disruptions swiftly.
Edge: Maestro PMS.
Infor HMS features 113 verified partner integrations, including key players like Booking.com, Expedia, and HRS, with 49 shared partners with Maestro. Its extensive network supports seamless reservation and revenue management workflows.
Maestro PMS has 89 verified partners, including Criton, Net Affinity, and Kalibri Labs, with notable integrations for guest engagement and marketing. Its focus on property-specific modules complements its integration ecosystem.
While Infor leads in sheer number of verified integrations, both systems support core hotel functions well. Edge: Infor HMS.
Maestro PMS has higher overall ratings—4.36/5 and an 88% likelihood to recommend—based on 56 recent reviews, including positive comments on support and functionality. Its recent reviews suggest strong user satisfaction across hotel segments, especially resorts and boutique hotels.
In contrast, Infor HMS’s ratings are lower—4.04/5 with a 74% recommendation—reflecting less recent feedback and fewer reviews. Some users find it less intuitive and more prone to bugs.
Edge: Maestro PMS.
Infor HMS's pricing is not publicly disclosed and typically requires direct contact for a quote, which is common for enterprise solutions. It may involve custom implementation costs based on hotel size and needs.
Maestro PMS charges a flat monthly fee of around $900, with no setup or implementation fees mentioned. This predictable pricing model appeals to hotels with limited budgets and clear operational needs.
Not ideal if you prefer a highly modular or feature-rich platform, or if you need a system that’s highly intuitive with a modern UI.
Not ideal if you prefer a cloud-native platform with minimal modules or a highly modern, mobile-friendly UI.
Core Difference: Infor HMS is a cloud-based, customizable PMS with a focus on integration and automation, while Maestro PMS offers a broad suite of modules supporting diverse operational needs and multi-property management.
When to Choose Infor HMS: If your hotel values cloud mobility, seamless integrations, and customizable reporting. It’s ideal for properties prioritizing automation and future-proof scalability, especially if support and update stability are manageable.
When to Choose Maestro PMS: If your hotel benefits from a comprehensive, modular system with robust support, especially if you operate a resort or boutique property requiring extensive features like spa, online booking, and guest messaging.
Final Verdict: For hotels looking for a system with a larger recent review base and better recent user satisfaction, Maestro PMS is the clear leader. Its higher ratings, recent reviews, and support quality make it the safer choice for most properties.
However, if you need a flexible, cloud-native platform with advanced integrations and customization, Infor HMS remains a strong contender—though its fewer recent reviews suggest a need to verify ongoing user satisfaction.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Infor HMS 和 Maestro PMS (Northwind) 共享 19 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 水疗和健康模块 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 28 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
报告功能经常被强调。用户喜欢标准报告和创建自定义报告的功能,这有助于进行详细的性能跟踪。然而,有些人发现更新会破坏报告格式和功能。
Infor HMS 因其与 Booking.com、HRS 和 Expedia 等预订平台的无缝集成而受到称赞。这大大减少了手动输入错误并提高了管理预订的效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Infor HMS 的支持团队因其响应能力和专业性而备受赞誉,这对于快速解决问题至关重要。用户对支持代表如何指导他们解决问题表示赞赏。
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Maestro PMS 提供出色的客户支持,许多用户都称赞其通过各种渠道提供的快速有效的帮助。这种支持文化有利于迅速解决问题。
用户对 Maestro PMS 生成自定义报告的灵活性表示赞赏,这有助于做出数据驱动的决策。然而,一些人指出,需要更详细的帮助菜单和更方便地访问特定类型的报告。
定制化是一大优势,无论是报告、特定物业需求模块还是运营灵活性。Maestro PMS 允许进行大量定制,这有助于高效满足独特的业务需求。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然该系统提供了强大的功能,但一些用户指出,其用户界面略显过时,可以通过现代化来改善用户体验,特别是对于新员工而言。
安全性是一项强大的功能,具有本地解决方案选项并遵守 GDPR 等法规。用户还建议使用 2FA 和反向代理等增强功能来提高在线安全性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Infor HMS 和 Maestro PMS (Northwind) 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Infor HMS 提供 113 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Maestro PMS (Northwind) 提供 89 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Maestro PMS (Northwind) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.1/5 对比 3.9/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Infor HMS:否。Maestro PMS (Northwind):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Infor 的 HT Score 为 22,Maestro PMS 的为 70。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问