The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Maxial |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #44 8 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #25 24 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #19 9 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #24 2 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Maxial |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #28 24 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #23 26 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #29 8 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #31 6 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Maxial |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #22 20 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #24 17 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #28 1 条评价 | — |
When choosing between Infor HMS and Maxial, your hotel must consider core functionality, user experience, support, and regional presence. Infor HMS, with its extensive reviews and proven performance, clearly leads in most categories, but Maxial’s offerings might appeal to niche markets. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and specific operational needs.
Both products aim to streamline property management, but their market presence and feature sets differ significantly. Will the more established, reviewed system meet your expectations, or does Maxial’s approach better fit your unique hotel environment?
Infor HMS and Maxial serve the same fundamental purpose: simplifying hotel operations and guest management. Infor HMS is a cloud-based platform with a broad feature set, including housekeeping, online support, guest profiles, and revenue management modules. Maxial’s offerings are less detailed but focus on integrating reservations, billing, and guest feedback.
While Infor HMS boasts a large user base, a solid global presence, and 46 reviews in the last six months—indicating recent activity—Maxial remains virtually unreviewed, making it difficult to assess its current performance. Do you prioritize proven, recent feedback, or are you open to evaluating an emerging system with limited data?
If your hotel requires a mature, well-supported property management system with extensive features like housekeeping, revenue management, and multi-lingual capabilities, Infor HMS is the clear choice. It’s suited for hotels of all sizes, especially those looking for proven integrations and regional coverage.
If your hotel is small or operates in a niche market with simpler needs, and you’re willing to take a gamble on a less-reviewed platform, Maxial might be worth exploring. However, with zero recent reviews and no detailed feature information, Infor’s well-documented track record makes it the safer, more reliable pick.
Infor HMS has a user rating of 3.88 out of 5 for ease of use, supported by positive reviews noting its straightforward navigation once familiar. Its onboarding process scores 3.64, with users appreciating the quick setup but citing some room for additional training resources. The support team’s responsiveness is consistently praised, helping staff adopt the system smoothly.
Maxial’s usability remains unverified due to the absence of reviews. Its lack of documented user feedback makes it impossible to compare directly. Based on available data, Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS offers over 20 unique features, including a housekeeping module, online 24/7 support, guest profiles, calendar view, direct billing, multi-currency and multi-lingual support, and revenue management tools. These are essential for larger, complex hotels seeking an all-in-one management platform.
Maxial provides no detailed feature list, making it impossible to compare feature depth or breadth. Given Infor’s extensive capabilities and documented unique modules, Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS scores a 4.04 out of 5 for customer support, with many reviews highlighting the team’s responsiveness and professionalism. Users appreciate prompt assistance, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting, which is critical for operational continuity.
Maxial’s support ratings and user feedback are unavailable, leaving its service quality uncertain. When choosing a critical operational system, support quality can be decisive. Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS connects with 113 verified partners, including major booking engines like Booking.com, Expedia, and HRS, along with revenue systems and other operational tools. These integrations streamline tasks and reduce manual work.
Maxial has no publicly verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with external systems. For hotels seeking a flexible, integrated platform, Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS has a total of 46 reviews, with a high overall rating of 4.04/5. Its recent reviews emphasize its feature richness and support quality. Hotels in independent, boutique, and city-center segments rate it notably higher, reflecting satisfaction among diverse property types.
Maxial’s lack of reviews prevents any meaningful comparison. Given the recent, substantial feedback for Infor, Edge: Infor HMS.
Pricing details for Infor HMS are not publicly available, which is typical for enterprise solutions; costs often depend on hotel size and scope. Maxial’s pricing is similarly undisclosed, with no mention of trial options or billing models.
Your best approach is to contact vendors directly for quotes tailored to your hotel’s needs, but Infor’s established presence suggests a more predictable investment pathway.
Not ideal if your property is small, with minimal technological needs or limited budget for complex systems.
Not ideal if your hotel requires proven reliability, extensive integrations, or regional support from a well-established vendor.
At its core, Infor HMS offers a proven, robust property management system supported by extensive reviews and a global presence. Its feature set and integrations address the needs of mid-sized to large hotels that require operational depth and reliability.
If your hotel values recent user feedback, a broad feature suite, and a trusted support network, Infor HMS is the clear choice. It’s particularly suited for hotels that need automation, multi-lingual support, and seamless booking integrations.
On the other hand, Maxial appears more suited for smaller properties or resorts with limited operational complexity eager to experiment with AI-driven reviews and simplified management. Yet, the absence of recent reviews and detailed features makes it a less certain option.
Choose Infor HMS if you prioritize proven performance, extensive features, and reliable support. Opt for Maxial only if your hotel’s needs are minimal, and you’re comfortable evaluating an untested system with limited user feedback.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
报告功能经常被强调。用户喜欢标准报告和创建自定义报告的功能,这有助于进行详细的性能跟踪。然而,有些人发现更新会破坏报告格式和功能。
Infor HMS 因其与 Booking.com、HRS 和 Expedia 等预订平台的无缝集成而受到称赞。这大大减少了手动输入错误并提高了管理预订的效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Infor HMS 的支持团队因其响应能力和专业性而备受赞誉,这对于快速解决问题至关重要。用户对支持代表如何指导他们解决问题表示赞赏。
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Infor HMS 和 Maxial 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Infor HMS 提供 113 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Maxial 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Infor HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 3.9/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Infor HMS:否。Maxial:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Infor 的 HT Score 为 22,Maxial 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问