The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #44 8 条评价 | #7 147 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #25 24 条评价 | #8 102 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #19 9 条评价 | #8 14 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #24 2 条评价 | #7 8 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #28 24 条评价 | #11 100 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #23 26 条评价 | #13 57 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #29 8 条评价 | #9 50 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #31 6 条评价 | #3 65 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #22 20 条评价 | #11 63 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #24 17 条评价 | #23 20 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #28 1 条评价 | #12 10 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #8 7 条评价 |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) for your hotel involves balancing features, ease of use, support, and overall value. Infor HMS and RMS are both established options, but they serve different hotel profiles and operational needs. Your decision hinges on understanding their strengths, limitations, and which aligns best with your hotel’s scale and ambitions.
Both products aim to improve operational efficiency and guest experiences, but Infor HMS emphasizes customization and integration, while RMS focuses on simplicity and scalability. So, which one better suits your hotel’s unique context?
Infor HMS and RMS are built around solving core hotel management problems—reservations, guest data, and operational workflows—yet they approach these from different angles. Infor HMS is a comprehensive, cloud-based platform with extensive customization options, suited for hotels needing tailored workflows and deep integration capabilities.
RMS, by contrast, offers a more streamlined interface with a focus on ease of use, rapid onboarding, and automation, appealing to properties that prioritize simplicity and quick deployment. Both systems aim to optimize operations, but the choice depends on whether your hotel needs deep customization (Infor) or rapid, straightforward management (RMS).
The divergence is clear: does your team prefer a highly customizable, feature-rich system or a more accessible, user-friendly platform? Which aligns with your operational complexity and growth plans?
If your hotel operates in a highly competitive, complex environment where customization and integrations are critical—such as luxury or boutique properties—Infor HMS is the better choice. Its ability to be tailored and integrated with numerous partners suits hotels with advanced operational needs and a focus on personalized guest experiences.
Conversely, if your hotel needs a system that’s quick to implement, easy to train staff on, and capable of scaling efficiently—like motels, RV parks, or smaller hotels—RMS is the pragmatic pick. Its user-friendly design and proven scalability make it ideal for properties looking to streamline operations without extensive IT overhead.
For hotels seeking advanced reporting, extensive integrations, and flexible workflows, Infor HMS provides an edge. For those prioritizing speed, simplicity, and responsive support, RMS is the more suitable platform.
Based on recent reviews, RMS outperforms Infor HMS in ease of use, with a score of 4.28/5 versus 3.88/5. RMS’s interface is celebrated for its clarity, with users describing it as “very user-friendly,” and onboarding is rated at 4.12/5, compared to Infor’s 3.64/5. RMS also benefits from more recent reviews—20 from the last six months—indicating ongoing product refinement and strong support responsiveness.
Meanwhile, Infor HMS users mention that once familiar, navigation is straightforward, but initial onboarding can be sluggish, and some find the interface “not pretty” or less intuitive. Frequent server issues and bugs during updates also complicate usability.
Edge: RMS, especially for teams that need quick adoption and ongoing ease of use.
RMS boasts a broader feature set, with 54 exclusive features—including integrated CRS, booking engine, guest CRM, multi-lingual support, POS, digital registration, and guest messaging—compared to Infor’s zero unique features. This extensive suite facilitates end-to-end management, from online booking to guest communications.
Infor HMS offers core property management functionalities with 20 shared features but lacks the expansive add-ons of RMS. Its strengths lie in integration with operational systems and customizable reporting, yet it doesn’t match RMS’s breadth.
Edge: RMS, for its richer, more varied feature options tailored to diverse hotel needs.
RMS’s support ratings are higher, with a 4.48/5 score and recent reviews praising its “proactive,” “helpful,” and “friendly” service. Users cite quick response times, knowledgeable staff, and effective issue resolution, especially in complex or urgent situations.
Infor HMS support is rated at 4.04/5, with some reviews noting prompt responses, but others highlight issues with bugs and system updates causing disruptions. Support appears reliable but less consistently praised than RMS.
Edge: RMS, for its more recent, highly rated customer service and support team responsiveness.
In terms of verified partners, both systems are comparable, with Infor offering 113 partners and RMS 112. Shared integrations include major players like Fairmas, Unifocus, and IVvy. Infor has exclusive integrations with Priority Software, Omnibees, and Zaplox, while RMS offers unique partners like Criton, Sage, and FLYR Hospitality.
The similar partner counts suggest both are well-connected, but RMS’s slightly broader ecosystem—plus its dedicated POS and guest portal integrations—may provide more seamless operational flow for properties with complex tech environments.
Edge: RMS, for its slightly larger and more diverse integration ecosystem.
RMS receives a higher overall rating of 4.56/5 from 293 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use and support, especially among mid-market and budget hotels. Its NPS score of 8.51 confirms strong customer loyalty.
Infor, with 46 reviews and a score of 4.04/5, is less favored overall, with many recent comments pointing to stability issues and a desire for a more modern interface. The volume of recent reviews clearly favors RMS’s continued product improvement and customer satisfaction.
Edge: RMS, based on review volume and recent feedback.
Infor HMS does not list a specific price, which is typical for enterprise software—likely requiring a custom quote based on hotel size and requirements. RMS charges $800 monthly per property, with no free tier, but this includes comprehensive features suitable for most mid-size hotels and resorts.
While RMS’s transparent pricing makes budgeting easier, Infor’s custom quotes may be more suitable for large, complex properties with specific needs and budgets.
Hotels that benefit most from Infor HMS:
Not ideal if:
RMS is best suited for:
Not ideal if:
RMS and Infor HMS serve different hotel profiles. Infor’s strength lies in customization, extensive integrations, and detailed operational control, making it ideal for large, complex properties or those with specific workflows. RMS excels in ease of use, rapid onboarding, and a broad feature set, making it perfect for smaller or mid-sized hotels aiming for efficiency.
If your hotel needs a flexible, deep system, Infor HMS delivers the most comprehensive solution. If simplicity, quick deployment, and support matter most, RMS is the clear choice.
In conclusion, RMS’s more recent reviews and higher market presence make it the stronger option for most hotels today, especially if ease of use and ongoing support are top priorities. However, larger hotels with complex needs might benefit from Infor’s customization capabilities despite its steeper learning curve.
This comprehensive comparison should help your team make an informed decision aligned with your hotel’s operational scale and strategic goals.
我们分析了 3 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
报告功能经常被强调。用户喜欢标准报告和创建自定义报告的功能,这有助于进行详细的性能跟踪。然而,有些人发现更新会破坏报告格式和功能。
Infor HMS 因其与 Booking.com、HRS 和 Expedia 等预订平台的无缝集成而受到称赞。这大大减少了手动输入错误并提高了管理预订的效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Infor HMS 的支持团队因其响应能力和专业性而备受赞誉,这对于快速解决问题至关重要。用户对支持代表如何指导他们解决问题表示赞赏。
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
排名更高的方面
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
RMS 的支持团队因其积极主动、知识渊博的帮助而备受赞誉。然而,用户也反映需要更多数字化学习资源和视频教程,以帮助他们更好地使用系统并最大限度地发挥各项功... RMS 的支持团队因其积极主动、知识渊博的帮助而备受赞誉。然而,用户也反映需要更多数字化学习资源和视频教程,以帮助他们更好地使用系统并最大限度地发挥各项功能的效用。
RMS 因其支持业务增长的能力而备受赞誉,尤其适用于需要复杂运营支持的房车度假村。用户称赞其可扩展性和丰富的功能集,包括开箱即用的预订管理、报告和客房服务... RMS 因其支持业务增长的能力而备受赞誉,尤其适用于需要复杂运营支持的房车度假村。用户称赞其可扩展性和丰富的功能集,包括开箱即用的预订管理、报告和客房服务等。这种全面性使酒店能够有效地简化各种运营流程。
用户对RMS卓越的信托会计支持赞不绝口,称赞其在会计问题上提供可靠快捷的帮助。系统的更新进一步提升了其高效管理物业信托会计的能力,许多用户指出,这一功能... 用户对RMS卓越的信托会计支持赞不绝口,称赞其在会计问题上提供可靠快捷的帮助。系统的更新进一步提升了其高效管理物业信托会计的能力,许多用户指出,这一功能显著降低了操作复杂性,使物业经理能够专注于其他关键任务。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
预订系统评价褒贬不一,用户呼吁提升其功能完善度和移动端友好性。建议包括简化预订流程,并考虑为回头客提供免费预订服务,以增强客户忠诚度并促进重复消费。
尽管RMS提供了强大的报表编写工具,但客户仍要求提供更多自定义选项。建议包括可编辑字段和可选列,以便更快、更灵活地生成报表,从而帮助用户进行日常决策,而... 尽管RMS提供了强大的报表编写工具,但客户仍要求提供更多自定义选项。建议包括可编辑字段和可选列,以便更快、更灵活地生成报表,从而帮助用户进行日常决策,而无需从头开始重新构建报表。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Infor HMS 和 RMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Infor HMS 提供 113 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RMS 提供 112 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。RMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.3/5 对比 3.9/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Infor HMS:否。RMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Infor 的 HT Score 为 22,RMS 的为 91。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问