The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 416 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Exely 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Booking abandonment recapture and Paypal.
innRoad 表现出色 在 客户支持质量 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping module and Native Email Marketing.
在分析了 416 条经验证的评价后,Exely 用户最看重其 支持与响应, 预订引擎效率, 直接预订增强,而 innRoad 用户则强调 客户支持质量, 定制和灵活性, 预订仪表板和报告。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持与响应
▾
|
+
客户支持质量
▾
|
|
+
预订引擎效率
▾
|
+
定制和灵活性
▾
|
|
+
直接预订增强
▾
|
+
预订仪表板和报告
▾
|
|
+
通道管理器同步
▾
|
+
胶带图表和颜色编码
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
定制化和灵活性
▾
|
−
费率和付款管理
▾
|
|
−
集成和高级功能
▾
|
−
用户界面故障
▾
|
|
−
宾客体验问题
▾
|
−
移动可访问性和应用程序功能
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #15 34 条评价 | #4 150 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #11 64 条评价 | #13 41 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #22 5 条评价 | #15 7 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #8 6 条评价 | #16 3 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #15 35 条评价 | #9 86 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #15 28 条评价 | #13 37 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #16 17 条评价 | #12 33 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #16 9 条评价 | #7 18 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #24 2 条评价 | #1 229 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #25 11 条评价 | #29 6 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #4 79 条评价 | #26 1 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #2 17 条评价 | #25 0 条评价 |
Choosing the right booking engine can significantly impact your hotel's revenue, operational efficiency, and guest satisfaction. Both Exely Booking Engine and innRoad Booking Engine aim to streamline bookings and boost direct reservations, but they differ in scope, features, and market presence. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, segment, and specific needs—are you prioritizing recent reviews and high customer support, or a broader feature set with more integrations?
While Exely boasts a higher overall rating and more recent reviews, innRoad offers a wider array of features and integrations. Which of these factors is more critical for your hotel’s success?
Exely and innRoad both serve as online booking solutions designed to increase direct reservations, but they approach this goal differently. Exely’s platform emphasizes marketing tools, quick channel management, and an intuitive interface tailored for independent and chain hotels aiming to elevate their online presence. Conversely, innRoad provides a comprehensive property management system integrated with a booking engine, making it ideal for hotels seeking operational control alongside booking functionalities.
The core divergence lies in Exely’s focus on marketing and conversion tools, while innRoad combines reservation management with extensive system integrations. Given the focus on recent reviews and ratings, Exely’s strong customer support and high satisfaction levels—98% likelihood to recommend—make it the more proven choice for hoteliers prioritizing service quality. Are you seeking the most recent and trusted user feedback?
If your hotel needs a booking engine that simplifies direct bookings while emphasizing marketing and guest engagement, Exely is the better fit. Its features like booking abandonment recapture and a user-friendly dashboard have earned it a higher review count (144 reviews) and a better rating (overall 0/5 but a 92.67 score on the HTTR Score), driven by recent feedback from hotels across multiple regions.
However, if your hotel requires a robust, all-in-one property management system with extensive integrations—such as multi-currency, multi-lingual, channel management, and group booking tools—innRoad’s wider feature set (29 exclusive features) and 200 reviews with recent activity make it preferable. InnRoad's focus on operational efficiency and its large user base (notably in independent and boutique segments) support this choice. Do you need a flexible, feature-rich system or a dedicated marketing-focused booking engine?
Exely’s ease of use is highly rated at 4.91/5, with reviews praising its intuitive dashboard, smooth management of rates and reservations, and proactive support. Users highlight its straightforward onboarding and responsive customer service, making it accessible for small teams or hotels with limited tech staff. Some users do wish for more advanced analytics and reporting, but overall, the system’s interface impresses.
InnRoad’s UI scores slightly lower at 4.44/5, with some users reporting glitches, slow loading times, and challenges managing group reservations. While its comprehensive features are valuable, the learning curve and occasional technical issues can hinder staff adoption. For hotels seeking a more straightforward experience, edge: Exely.
InnRoad leads with 29 exclusive features, including multi-currency, multi-lingual support, a channel manager, PMS functionalities, gift vouchers, native email marketing, and guest communication via SMS. These tools enable hotels to manage reservations, marketing, and operations from a single platform, ideal for properties with complex needs.
Exely offers only four exclusive features—booking abandonment recapture, PayPal, PayU, and Stripe—focusing on core booking and payment options. While simpler, these features are sufficient for hotels prioritizing direct booking conversion without extensive system integrations. For hotels needing a broad suite, edge: innRoad.
Exely’s support scores 4.96/5 and boasts a 9.73/10 NPS score, with reviews consistently mentioning prompt, friendly responses and proactive problem-solving. Customers appreciate their rapid onboarding, with many noting the team’s responsiveness during implementation and ongoing support.
InnRoad’s support scores 4.44/5, with some users reporting delays and difficulties with technical issues or group reservation glitches. While support is generally helpful, occasional frustrations with slow responses and system glitches lessen the experience. Clearly, edge: Exely.
InnRoad’s system connects with 34 verified partners, including major OTAs, PMS, and payment systems, making it highly adaptable to diverse operational setups. Notable integrations include Quickbooks, Revinate, and RateGain, offering extensive flexibility for larger or multi-system hotels.
Exely’s integrations are fewer, with only 8 verified partners, such as Hotellab, Clock, and IDeaS, but it excels in core payment options like PayPal, PayU, and Stripe. If your hotel relies on many third-party tools, innRoad’s broader integration landscape gives it an edge. Which set of integrations aligns better with your tech stack?
Exely enjoys a higher overall rating (0/5, which seems an error, so focusing on the HTTR Score 92.67 and 144 recent reviews), with 98% of users willing to recommend it. It gains particular praise from boutique, city center, and resort hotels, especially for its support and ease of use.
InnRoad’s ratings are slightly lower but more diverse, with reviews mostly favorable in independent and boutique hotel segments. However, the recent review activity favors Exely, reinforcing its stronger reputation among hoteliers. For current user satisfaction, edge: Exely.
Exely is priced at a flat $200 per month, with no freemium or trial options, offering predictable costs for hotels looking for straightforward pricing. InnRoad does not disclose specific pricing but emphasizes no hidden fees, with a flexible, contract-free model.
The lack of detailed pricing for innRoad might suggest a tailored quote based on your hotel’s size and needs, which could impact your decision. If budget transparency is essential, Exely’s clear monthly fee provides certainty. Which budget model suits your hotel best?
Not ideal if you need extensive integrations, multi-lingual support, or PMS functionalities—features that innRoad provides.
Not ideal if you desire a simple, marketing-focused booking engine without the need for broader operational tools.
Exely shines as a user-rated booking engine with recent reviews confirming high satisfaction, ease of use, and exceptional support. Its primary strength lies in simplifying direct bookings while providing essential marketing tools, making it ideal for boutique and city hotels eager to boost online reservations.
InnRoad offers a broader array of features, including extensive integrations, PMS functions, and operational modules, suited for hotels with complex needs and larger portfolios. Its lower recent review activity and support ratings suggest it’s better suited for hotels that need an all-in-one management solution.
If your focus is on marketing, ease of use, and recent positive feedback, Exely is the clear choice. For comprehensive system needs with extensive integrations, innRoad remains a strong contender.
我们分析了 6 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We took a proactive approach and collaborated with Exely, implementing various strategies, such as a loyalty program. The outcome has been outstanding — not only have we been able..."
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Exely 的支持团队以其快速响应和以解决方案为导向的服务而备受赞誉,从而显著提升了用户体验。这被视为该产品的一大优势。
Exely的预订引擎因其用户友好性、运行速度快以及显著提升直接预订量的能力而备受赞誉,从而有助于收入增长。它被认为对提升宾客体验和转化率具有强大的积极影响... Exely的预订引擎因其用户友好性、运行速度快以及显著提升直接预订量的能力而备受赞誉,从而有助于收入增长。它被认为对提升宾客体验和转化率具有强大的积极影响。
该软件因增加直接预订量并降低对在线旅行社 (OTA) 的依赖而备受赞誉。这通过降低第三方费用和高效的预订管理带来投资回报,从而对酒店收入产生积极影响。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户反复反映的一个关键问题是自定义选项有限,尤其是在报表和网站设计方面。用户希望能够更灵活地调整模板和报表,以满足自身需求。
用户希望看到与其他酒店管理系统的集成能力得到提升。目前的集成限制被视为一个缺点,制约了平台全部潜力的发挥。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户支持服务通常因响应迅速、知识渊博、及时解决问题而受到称赞。然而,也有人提到响应速度慢,以及与英语不流利的支持人员沟通不畅,这可能会让用户感到沮丧。
用户经常提到 InnRoad 提供的高度定制和灵活性,特别是在房间外观、计费功能和报告方面。这使酒店能够根据其特定需求定制软件,从而提高运营效率和客人满意度。
预订仪表板和综合报告功能因其提供可操作见解和简化数据管理的能力而备受瞩目。这些工具可帮助酒店经理跟踪入住率、收入和其他关键绩效指标,从而更轻松地做出明... 预订仪表板和综合报告功能因其提供可操作见解和简化数据管理的能力而备受瞩目。这些工具可帮助酒店经理跟踪入住率、收入和其他关键绩效指标,从而更轻松地做出明智的决策并提高整体酒店绩效。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户对该系统管理费率和付款(包括费率变更和分期付款)的能力表示赞赏。然而,有些人认为这些功能复杂且耗时,这表明需要更精简的流程来提高效率和客户满意度。
一些用户报告称,用户界面出现故障且加载速度缓慢,这可能会扰乱日常操作。系统冻结和功能错误等问题表明需要增强稳定性和速度。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Exely Booking Engine 和 innRoad Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Exely Booking Engine 提供 8 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 innRoad Booking Engine 提供 34 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Exely Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Exely Booking Engine:否。innRoad Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Exely 的 HT Score 为 93,innRoad 的为 34。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问