The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #7 101 条评价 | #15 32 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #10 36 条评价 | #22 6 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 10 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #6 4 条评价 | #20 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 70 条评价 | #16 29 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #9 34 条评价 | #15 18 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #11 20 条评价 | #17 9 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #12 12 条评价 | #13 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #6 166 条评价 | #19 6 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #21 4 条评价 | #15 10 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #21 1 条评价 | #22 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | #19 1 条评价 | #8 2 条评价 |
Choosing between innRoad All-in-1 HMS and Preno HMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational scale, and growth ambitions. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but innRoad offers a broader feature set and larger global presence, while Preno emphasizes simplicity and ease of use. Your decision should consider which product aligns better with your current workflows and future plans.
innRoad’s extensive features and larger review base make it the more proven solution for independent hotels seeking growth. Preno’s straightforward approach appeals to properties prioritizing simplicity and rapid onboarding. Which software will propel your hotel forward?
innRoad and Preno are both designed to manage reservations, staff, and guest communication, but innRoad’s comprehensive platform supports more advanced revenue tools and integrations. Preno’s strength lies in its user-friendly interface and fast setup, though it offers fewer advanced features.
innRoad’s 148 reviews, including recent feedback, give it a clear edge in reliability and user confidence. Preno’s 58 reviews, despite high ratings, lack recent data, which diminishes the strength of its review base. Given the more recent reviews and higher overall score, innRoad stands out as the more trusted choice for hotel management.
If your hotel needs a robust, all-in-one system with channel management, online booking, and revenue tools, innRoad is the better fit. Its large feature set (52 unique features) supports complex operations, making it ideal for independent hotels looking to scale.
On the other hand, if your team values simplicity, quick onboarding, and reliable support, Preno’s streamlined platform (offering only 4 features exclusive to it) is suited for small properties or those new to PMS software. For properties needing advanced revenue management and extensive integrations, innRoad’s capabilities outweigh Preno’s straightforward approach.
innRoad’s user rating of 4.47/5 and customer feedback highlight its generally intuitive interface, but some users find certain UI components less streamlined. Its onboarding score of 4.25/5 is solid, though some review comments suggest room for UI improvements and faster system updates.
Preno’s ease of use is highly praised, with a 4.86/5 rating and positive comments about its straightforward setup and intuitive navigation. Support responsiveness and quick learning curve give Preno the edge for hotels prioritizing rapid staff adoption.
Edge: Preno.
innRoad offers a vast array of 52 features exclusive to it, including multi-currency support, channel management, online check-in, automated reporting, and guest messaging. These capabilities support complex operations and revenue optimization.
Preno’s 4 unique features include native email marketing, pricing intelligence, POS, and a simplified booking engine. While these are valuable, they pale compared to innRoad’s extensive toolkit, especially for hotels with diverse needs.
Edge: innRoad.
innRoad’s support ratings (4.48/5) are strong, with reviews praising their 24/7 availability and dedicated support staff. However, some users mention occasional delays in issue resolution.
Preno’s customer support scores slightly higher at 4.69/5, with reviews emphasizing their quick, reliable service and attentive staff. Given the more recent positive reviews and high NPS (9.48/10), Preno’s support appears marginally better.
Edge: Preno.
innRoad boasts 34 verified partners, including major integrations like QuickBooks, RateGain, Oracle Hospitality, and its own booking engine. Its extensive partner network supports more complex, multi-channel operations.
Preno has 17 verified partners, including Xero and SiteMinder, but fewer overall integrations. If a hotel relies on a broad ecosystem of third-party tools, innRoad’s greater number of verified connections is advantageous.
Edge: innRoad.
innRoad’s reviews, totaling 148 and more recent, reflect an average rating of 4.72/5, with independent hotels and motels rating it highly (4.7+). Clients frequently cite increased revenue and operational improvements.
Preno’s 58 reviews, although recent and with a perfect 5/5 complementing a high 4.86/5 usability score, lack the volume of feedback to establish dominance. Given the larger review base and recent data, innRoad’s scores are more representative.
Edge: innRoad.
Both products are priced at $600/month, with no additional implementation or trial fees. Their flat, subscription-based model simplifies budgeting, but compare your expected usage to ensure value.
Since pricing is aligned, your choice should focus on feature needs rather than cost differences.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
innRoad offers a more comprehensive, feature-rich platform with extensive integrations and a proven track record across multiple regions. Its large review base and recent positive feedback establish it as a reliable choice for hotels looking to grow and optimize revenue.
Preno excels in simplicity, speed of onboarding, and attentive support, making it ideal for small or boutique properties that prioritize ease of use. Its limited feature set and more recent data suggest it’s better suited for properties with straightforward management needs.
If your hotel demands advanced tools, channel management, and scalability, innRoad should be your choice. Conversely, if you want a quick-to-implement, easy-to-learn PMS with reliable support, Preno is a solid option.
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然 Innroad 总体上是用户友好的,但 UI 和导航等某些方面可以更加直观。这些方面的改进将使新用户受益,并使日常操作更加高效。
Innroad 直观的预订管理系统简化了整个预订流程。它提供全面的数据访问,使员工能够高效地处理多房间预订和客人信息。
24/7 客户支持因其可用性和所提供帮助的质量而受到称赞。然而,一些用户报告称,偶尔会遇到沟通和解决速度方面的困难。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户提到频繁更新有时会降低系统性能,影响生产力。尽管更新带来好处,但建议更高效地推出并尽量减少干扰。
一些评论呼吁改进自定义报告功能。用户建议提供更详细、可自定义的报告选项,以便更深入地了解客户行为和运营指标。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Preno 的用户友好界面受到用户的高度赞扬。许多人注意到该系统的简单性和直观性,这大大降低了学习难度。这使得员工(即使是技术技能有限的员工)也能快速上手,... Preno 的用户友好界面受到用户的高度赞扬。许多人注意到该系统的简单性和直观性,这大大降低了学习难度。这使得员工(即使是技术技能有限的员工)也能快速上手,从而加快了运营速度。
客户普遍看重 Preno 的响应式客户支持,实时聊天和全面的帮助资源被强调是其一大优势。不过,一些评论提到需要更持续的全天候服务。
用户经常提到 Preno 的自动化功能,该功能简化了开票和报告等管理任务。这种自动化功能可节省大量时间并减少人工错误,使员工能够更加专注于客人体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管反馈积极,但用户指出仍有改进空间。建议的改进包括高级报告、更好的移动应用功能和增强的客户互动工具。这些更新被视为满足不断变化的行业需求的必要条件。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。innRoad All-in-1 HMS 和 Preno HMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。innRoad All-in-1 HMS 提供 34 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Preno HMS 提供 17 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Preno HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
innRoad All-in-1 HMS:否。Preno HMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。innRoad 的 HT Score 为 27,Preno 的为 76。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问