The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 327 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
innRoad 表现出色 在 用户界面和可用性 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.8/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping module and Native Email Marketing.
Visual Matrix PMS 表现出色 在 technical support challenges 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Native Email Marketing and Guest Feedback Management.
基于 HTR 上 327 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 175 | 152 |
在分析了 327 条经验证的评价后,innRoad 用户最看重其 用户界面和可用性, 预订管理, 客户支持,而 Visual Matrix PMS 用户则强调 technical support challenges, 用户友好的界面, comprehensive reporting tools。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和可用性
▾
|
+
Technical support challenges
▾
|
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
+
用户友好的界面
▾
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
+
Comprehensive reporting tools
▾
|
|
+
自定义报告
▾
|
+
Streamlined operations
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
系统性能和更新
▾
|
−
Technical support challenges
▾
|
|
−
自定义报告
▾
|
−
Booking and reservation management
▾
|
|
−
定制
▾
|
−
系统速度和功能可用性
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #7 101 条评价 | #18 23 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #10 36 条评价 | #2 117 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 10 条评价 | #11 5 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #6 4 条评价 | #16 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 70 条评价 | #12 38 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #9 34 条评价 | #16 17 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #11 20 条评价 | #1 124 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #12 12 条评价 | #4 44 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #6 166 条评价 | #7 141 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | #21 4 条评价 | #32 1 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #21 1 条评价 | #18 2 条评价 |
| 中东 | #19 1 条评价 | — |
When choosing between innRoad All-in-1 HMS and Visual Matrix PMS, your hotel’s operational ease, feature set, customer support, and overall reputation must guide you. InnRoad boasts a higher review count and more recent feedback, indicating a stronger current performance. Visual Matrix, with its extensive integration options and focus on understaffed teams, appeals to specific operational models. Are you seeking a system with more recent customer validation or one tailored for streamlined staff management?
Both innRoad and Visual Matrix aim to simplify hotel management, but they diverge in their core strengths. innRoad emphasizes an all-in-one platform with reservation, booking engine, and channel management integrated, aiming at increasing direct bookings and revenue. Visual Matrix focuses on operational automation, especially for understaffed hotels, with features like the MOP app for housekeeping and maintenance. Which aligns better with your hotel's current pain points—revenue growth or operational automation?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, user-friendly solution to boost direct bookings and handle multi-channel distribution, innRoad likely suits you better, especially given its higher rating of 4.72/5 from 148 reviews. If staff management and real-time operational control in understaffed environments are your priorities, Visual Matrix’s automation tools and 24/7 support might serve you more, despite a lower overall rating of 3.75/5 from 143 reviews. Your decision hinges on whether revenue growth or operational efficiency is your immediate focus.
innRoad earns a slightly higher ease of use rating at 4.47/5, with many reviewers praising its intuitive interface and quick learning curve. Users mention that innRoad's onboarding process is smooth, with reports consistently highlighting its user-friendly design. Visual Matrix scores 4.43/5, and users appreciate its straightforwardness but note some initial transition challenges. Overall, innRoad’s interface seems marginally simpler for staff training and daily operations. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad offers 35 features exclusive to its platform, including a website builder, online booking engine, channel management, multi-currency support, and integrated payment processing—features that directly impact revenue and guest experience. Visual Matrix provides 13 unique features, such as a guest app, rules-based room assignments, and a native messaging system, mainly focusing on operational automation. innRoad’s broader feature set, especially for direct booking and revenue management, gives it the edge here.
innRoad’s reviews frequently highlight its 24/7 live support, with many praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of its support team. Customers share quotes like "Outstanding and easy-to-use support that’s available anytime," reflecting high satisfaction. Visual Matrix also offers strong support but receives slightly lower ratings, with some users mentioning difficulties in reaching tech help during critical moments. Given the recency and volume of innRoad reviews, Edge: innRoad.
innRoad connects to 34 verified partners, including major platforms like QuickBooks, Revinate, and RateGain, and offers extensive third-party integrations for revenue management, accounting, and marketing. Visual Matrix has 23 verified partners, including SkyTouch Technology and SiteMinder, but fewer overall. The broader integration ecosystem makes innRoad more versatile for diverse hotel tech stacks. Edge: innRoad.
Hotel reviews in the last six months show innRoad with a 4.72/5 overall rating, compared to Visual Matrix’s 3.75/5, based on similar review counts. InnRoad’s higher score reflects consistent positive feedback, especially from independent and boutique hotels. Visual Matrix’s ratings are lower, with some users citing sluggish performance and limited features. For recent, high-rated user satisfaction, innRoad is the clear choice. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad charges $600 per month with no hidden fees, offering a fixed pricing model suitable for hotels seeking predictable expenses. Visual Matrix’s base price is $500 per month, also without implementation or hidden costs, making them comparable on initial pricing. However, innRoad’s higher overall rating and recent reviews suggest greater value for the investment.
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on complex billing or has highly specialized operational workflows.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive revenue management tools or a broad feature set beyond automation.
innRoad and Visual Matrix serve different hotel needs but differ significantly in reputation, recent reviews, and feature breadth. innRoad provides a broad, highly-rated all-in-one solution optimized for independent hotels aiming to boost direct bookings and revenue. Visual Matrix excels in staff automation and operational control, particularly for understaffed properties but has lower overall ratings.
Choose innRoad if your goal is revenue growth, ease of use, and a stronger support network. Opt for Visual Matrix if operational automation and staff connectivity are your priorities, especially if your team is small or understaffed.
In conclusion, innRoad’s more recent reviews and higher overall score make it the safer bet for hotels seeking a comprehensive, user-friendly management platform. However, your specific operational needs may tilt the decision toward Visual Matrix’s automation features, especially if staff management is your primary concern.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,innRoad All-in-1 HMS 和 Visual Matrix PMS 共享 42 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 定价情报 | ||
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 管家模块 | ||
| 网站开发 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 销售点 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 36 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然 Innroad 总体上是用户友好的,但 UI 和导航等某些方面可以更加直观。这些方面的改进将使新用户受益,并使日常操作更加高效。
Innroad 直观的预订管理系统简化了整个预订流程。它提供全面的数据访问,使员工能够高效地处理多房间预订和客人信息。
24/7 客户支持因其可用性和所提供帮助的质量而受到称赞。然而,一些用户报告称,偶尔会遇到沟通和解决速度方面的困难。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户提到频繁更新有时会降低系统性能,影响生产力。尽管更新带来好处,但建议更高效地推出并尽量减少干扰。
一些评论呼吁改进自定义报告功能。用户建议提供更详细、可自定义的报告选项,以便更深入地了解客户行为和运营指标。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improveme... While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improvements in call center operations.
Visual Matrix 的直观设计降低了学习难度,方便新员工使用。然而,一些用户提到,从其他系统过渡到 Visual Matrix 初期会遇到一些困难。
Users find Visual Matrix's reporting tools robust and comprehensive, aiding in informed decision-making by allowing access to detailed metrics on occu... Users find Visual Matrix's reporting tools robust and comprehensive, aiding in informed decision-making by allowing access to detailed metrics on occupancy, revenue, and forecasting.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improveme... While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improvements in call center operations.
The software's seamless integration with booking channels minimizes overbooking and improves reservation accuracy, ultimately maximizing revenue.
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。innRoad All-in-1 HMS 和 Visual Matrix PMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。innRoad All-in-1 HMS 提供 34 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Visual Matrix PMS 提供 23 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。innRoad All-in-1 HMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
innRoad All-in-1 HMS:否。Visual Matrix PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。innRoad 的 HT Score 为 27,Visual Matrix PMS 的为 80。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问