The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #6 179 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #16 47 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #13 11 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #9 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #12 96 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #15 45 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #16 33 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #13 17 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #3 275 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #34 5 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #39 1 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #34 0 条评价 | — |
Choosing between innRoad by innRoad and Jaras hinges on your property's specific needs. Both systems aim to streamline operations and increase revenue, but their strengths and limitations differ significantly. innRoad has a long-standing reputation with a large user base and extensive features, whereas Jaras is newer, with a focus on automation and extensive OTA integrations. Your decision should align with your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and growth plans.
The critical factor is that innRoad, with its larger review base and recent positive feedback, offers more proven reliability and support. Jaras, although innovative, has yet to establish the same level of trust among hoteliers. Are you ready to prioritize proven track record or the latest automation features?
innRoad is a comprehensive, cloud-based PMS renowned for its user-friendly interface, detailed reporting, and extensive integrations. It caters to a broad spectrum of property types, with a proven track record of increasing direct bookings and revenue. Its 238 reviews with a 4.7/5 overall rating and recent feedback solidify its reputation for stability and support.
Jaras, in contrast, is a newer platform built for scalable automation and distribution, boasting integrations with over 150 OTAs. However, with zero reviews and no recent feedback, its reliability remains untested at scale. Do you prefer an established system with proven results or a fresh platform promising advanced automation?
If your hotel needs a mature PMS with proven support, extensive features, and a strong North American and European presence, innRoad is your clear choice. It’s ideal for properties seeking reliable OTA integration, detailed reporting, and a system that’s been battle-tested across multiple segments, including inns, resorts, and budget hotels.
If your hotel requires a flexible, automation-focused platform with broad distribution channels and financial management tools, Jaras might appeal. But keep in mind, without reviews or case studies, it’s a riskier pick for properties that prioritize stability and proven ROI.
innRoad enjoys a high ease-of-use rating (4.49/5) with a user-friendly interface, mobile accessibility, and positive onboarding experiences noted by hoteliers. Reviewers highlight its intuitive Tape Chart and straightforward reservation management, although some mention occasional glitches and mobile limitations.
Jaras’ UI is untested publicly due to a lack of reviews, but its design aims to combine automation and centralization into a single dashboard. Without user feedback, we cannot confidently assess its usability. For now, edge: innRoad.
innRoad offers over 43 features exclusive to its platform, including a channel manager, booking engine, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, and more. Its extensive feature set supports comprehensive property management and revenue growth strategies.
Jaras provides 3 unique features, notably extensive OTA integrations with over 150 channels, automation of housekeeping and maintenance, and financial workflows. However, with fewer total features and no detailed breakdown of functionalities, innRoad's broader suite gives it a clear advantage. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad scores highly for support, with a 4.54/5 rating and 24/7 live assistance. Reviewers praise its prompt, knowledgeable support staff and smooth onboarding, though some mention slow resolution times during system glitches.
Jaras’s support offerings are unreviewed, given the absence of user feedback. Its recent market entry suggests support quality is untested, making innRoad the more reliable choice. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad boasts 34 verified integrations, including popular partners like QuickBooks, Revinate, and RateGain, providing extensive connectivity for various operational needs.
Jaras currently has zero verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with third-party systems. For properties relying on diverse integrations, innRoad’s ecosystem is a significant advantage. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad’s reviews are recent and plentiful, with a 4.7/5 rating from 238 reviews, primarily from hotels in North America and Europe. Hotels of various sizes praise its ease of use, support, and positive revenue impact.
Since Jaras has no reviews or recent feedback, its user rating remains unknown. Without real-world ratings, innRoad clearly leads in trusted user satisfaction. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad is priced at a flat $300 per month without additional fees, making it accessible for small to medium-sized hotels. Its transparent pricing includes the core system, with optional modules, but no specific add-ons are detailed.
Jaras’s fee is higher at $1,000 upfront, with no mention of ongoing monthly costs. As a newer platform, its total cost of ownership and value proposition are less clear. Based on available data, innRoad offers better value for established properties.
innRoad offers a mature, well-supported PMS trusted by thousands of hoteliers. Its extensive feature set, proven support, and large review base make it suitable for a wide range of property types, especially those focusing on increasing direct bookings and operational stability.
Jaras presents a promising newer option emphasizing automation and distribution. However, with no reviews or proven customer satisfaction data, it remains a riskier choice for properties that require certainty and reliability.
If your hotel values proven performance, extensive integrations, and ongoing support, innRoad is the safer, more dependable pick. Choose Jaras only if you’re comfortable being an early adopter and want cutting-edge automation features—just be prepared for a period of adjustment.
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然总体上是正面的,但一些评论提到需要加快解决问题的速度,并更好地沟通更新和修复。尽管如此,用户发现全天候支持对于解决任何问题都非常有用。
报告功能详细且可定制,有助于财务跟踪和决策。收益管理工具有助于动态调整房价并提高盈利能力。一些用户建议进一步定制报告以获得更个性化的见解。
用户喜欢与 OTA 的无缝集成以及响应式预订引擎,该引擎可推动直接预订并减少超额预订。这为许多酒店带来了显着的收入增长。然而,第三方集成有时会丢失详细信息... 用户喜欢与 OTA 的无缝集成以及响应式预订引擎,该引擎可推动直接预订并减少超额预订。这为许多酒店带来了显着的收入增长。然而,第三方集成有时会丢失详细信息,这引起了一些问题。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户报告称,系统偶尔会出现故障,例如 Tape Chart 冻结、费率变更不方便用户使用以及整个系统有时运行缓慢。这些问题偶尔会影响预订和办理登机手续。
InnRoad 的集成信用卡处理功能广受好评,尽管用户指出需要更好地处理退款和纠纷。PCI 合规性和安全支付处理功能值得赞赏。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。innRoad 和 Jaras 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。innRoad 提供 34 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Jaras 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。innRoad 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
innRoad:否。Jaras:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。innRoad 的 HT Score 为 31,Jaras 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问