The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 1,179 条经验证的评价后,innRoad 用户最看重其 客户支持, 报告和收入管理, 预订引擎和 ota 集成,而 Mews 用户则强调 ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
+
报告和收入管理
▾
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
+
预订引擎和 OTA 集成
▾
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
+
磁带图
▾
|
+
入职和支持
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
系统故障
▾
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
−
信用卡处理
▾
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
−
移动兼容性和应用程序
▾
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #6 179 条评价 | #3 329 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #16 47 条评价 | #1 397 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #13 11 条评价 | #3 45 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #9 5 条评价 | #3 49 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #12 96 条评价 | #1 483 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #15 45 条评价 | #5 220 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #16 33 条评价 | #2 170 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #13 17 条评价 | #1 130 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #3 275 条评价 | #8 106 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #34 5 条评价 | #1 660 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #39 1 条评价 | #10 17 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #34 0 条评价 | #28 8 条评价 |
Choosing between innRoad by innRoad and Mews PMS by Mews hinges on your hotel’s priorities. Both systems aim to streamline operations, boost revenue, and enhance guest experiences, but they approach these goals differently. innRoad offers a more traditional, feature-rich platform with a strong focus on property management and revenue tools, while Mews emphasizes automation, flexibility, and extensive integrations. Which aligns best with your hotel’s strategy and growth plans?
Given recent reviews, Mews’s 98 fresh reviews in the past six months and a higher overall rating of 4.62/5 (compared to innRoad's 4.7/5 from 238 reviews) make it the more reliable choice for current performance and support. Are you ready to dive into the details?
Both innRoad and Mews solve the core challenge of managing reservations, guest data, and operations efficiently. innRoad's strengths lie in its comprehensive property management features, including a booking engine, channel management, and revenue tools, with a focus on driving direct bookings and increasing occupancy. Conversely, Mews excels in automating workflows, cross-platform integrations, and offering a modern, user-centric interface that reduces manual tasks. Do you need a system that’s more operationally focused or one that emphasizes guest experience automation?
innRoad’s broader feature set caters well to hotels seeking an all-in-one solution with powerful management tools but may struggle with mobile and user interface simplicity. Mews's recent reviews highlight its intuitive design, quick onboarding, and seamless integrations, which are crucial for fast-paced, tech-savvy hotels. Will your team benefit more from a feature-rich traditional PMS or a flexible, automation-driven platform?
If your hotel primarily operates in North America or Europe with a focus on boutique, budget, or chain properties that value detailed revenue management, innRoad is a strong candidate. Its feature set—including a booking engine, group booking, and native email marketing—supports properties aiming to grow direct bookings and revenue.
However, if your hotel needs a scalable, flexible system that minimizes manual work and integrates with a broad ecosystem of third-party tools, Mews is the clear choice. Its 336 verified integrations, extensive automation, and user-friendly interface appeal especially to independent, boutique, or city-center hotels with diverse tech needs. For fast onboarding and ongoing innovation, Mews’s recent reviews point to a more modern experience. Which aligns with your current operational priorities?
innRoad’s UI scores 4.49/5, with reviews citing its ease of navigation and support, but some users mention glitches and a less modern interface. The onboarding process typically receives a 4.28/5 rating, yet some users report system slowdowns and bugs that impact daily operations.
Mews, on the other hand, scores a 4.7/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its modern, clean design and simplified workflows. Recent feedback highlights swift onboarding, with a 4.39/5 rating, and fewer complaints about glitches, thanks to continuous updates.
Edge: Mews.
innRoad offers 10 features exclusive to it, including a channel manager, booking engine, group booking, and revenue management. These are valuable for properties needing detailed operational control and revenue optimization.
Mews provides 13 unique features, such as guest CRM, guest profiles, EPoS, multilingual support, and rules-based room assignments, emphasizing automation and guest personalization. It also boasts a broader suite of 46 shared features, including reservations, billing, and integrations.
Edge: Mews, with its extensive ecosystem and more innovative features.
innRoad boasts a customer support score of 4.54/5, with reviews emphasizing stellar support, prompt responses, and dedicated advisors. Hoteliers frequently mention their appreciation for the 24/7 live support, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting.
Mews’s customer support scores 4.27/5, with reviews acknowledging responsiveness but noting occasional bugs and the need for ongoing improvements. Recent users appreciate their proactive support and frequent platform updates, though some mention occasional delays in bug resolution.
Edge: innRoad.
innRoad integrates with 34 verified partners, including QuickBooks, Airbnb, Booking.com, and Cisco Meraki. These cover essential management tools but are fewer compared to Mews’s ecosystem.
Mews boasts over 336 verified integrations, including popular partners like Sage, Criton, and Onity, along with a marketplace of over 1,000 apps. This extensive network allows greater customization and adaptability for evolving hotel tech stacks.
Edge: Mews.
innRoad has a total review count of 238, with a rating of 4.7/5. It receives praise especially from boutique and limited-service hotels, with a 4.72/5 rating from 221 reviews in those segments.
Mews, with 758 reviews and a 4.62/5 rating, is favored across boutique, independent, and city-center hotels. Recent reviews from 98 users in the last six months emphasize its modern interface and automation, with a 4.91/5 rating from independent hotels.
Given the volume and recency, Mews’s ratings reflect current, widespread satisfaction, especially among mid-sized and boutique properties.
Edge: Mews.
innRoad charges a base price of $300/month, with no hidden fees or implementation charges. Its pricing model suits smaller hotels or chains seeking transparent, predictable costs.
Mews’s base price is $900/month, reflecting its advanced features and extensive integrations. While more expensive, it’s competitive considering its modern capabilities and marketplace.
Both platforms lack trial info, but innRoad’s lower entry fee offers a more accessible starting point for smaller properties.
The core difference lies in their approach: innRoad is a comprehensive, traditional PMS with a long-standing presence in North America and Europe, offering deep revenue tools and management features. Mews, however, delivers a modern, automation-focused platform with superior integrations, ease of use, and rapid innovation, making it ideal for hotels that prioritize operational agility.
If your hotel needs detailed management tools and is comfortable with a classic PMS, innRoad provides a solid foundation. But for most hotels seeking to streamline workflows, scale easily, and stay current with hospitality tech trends, Mews’s recent reviews and extensive features make it the clear choice.
Choose innRoad if you want a familiar, feature-rich system rooted in traditional management. Opt for Mews if you desire a future-proof, adaptable platform that keeps your hotel operating at peak efficiency and guest satisfaction.
In summary, Mews’s more recent reviews, higher volume, and broader integrations give it a decisive edge in current hotel management. Its focus on automation and ease of use aligns with evolving industry needs, making it the preferable choice for most modern hoteliers.
我们分析了 12 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然总体上是正面的,但一些评论提到需要加快解决问题的速度,并更好地沟通更新和修复。尽管如此,用户发现全天候支持对于解决任何问题都非常有用。
报告功能详细且可定制,有助于财务跟踪和决策。收益管理工具有助于动态调整房价并提高盈利能力。一些用户建议进一步定制报告以获得更个性化的见解。
用户喜欢与 OTA 的无缝集成以及响应式预订引擎,该引擎可推动直接预订并减少超额预订。这为许多酒店带来了显着的收入增长。然而,第三方集成有时会丢失详细信息... 用户喜欢与 OTA 的无缝集成以及响应式预订引擎,该引擎可推动直接预订并减少超额预订。这为许多酒店带来了显着的收入增长。然而,第三方集成有时会丢失详细信息,这引起了一些问题。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户报告称,系统偶尔会出现故障,例如 Tape Chart 冻结、费率变更不方便用户使用以及整个系统有时运行缓慢。这些问题偶尔会影响预订和办理登机手续。
InnRoad 的集成信用卡处理功能广受好评,尽管用户指出需要更好地处理退款和纠纷。PCI 合规性和安全支付处理功能值得赞赏。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
虽然 Mews 提供了可靠的报表和分析功能,但一些评论指出,它需要更多可定制和灵活的报表功能。用户希望获得更细致的数据洞察,尤其是在预订和收入分析方面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
这取决于您的需求。innRoad 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。innRoad 提供 34 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 336 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
innRoad:否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。innRoad 的 HT Score 为 31,Mews 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问